Literature DB >> 23482703

NAFLD fibrosis score: a prognostic predictor for mortality and liver complications among NAFLD patients.

Sombat Treeprasertsuk1, Einar Björnsson, Felicity Enders, Sompongse Suwanwalaikorn, Keith D Lindor.   

Abstract

AIM: To study whether the severity of liver fibrosis estimated by the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score can predict all-cause mortality, cardiac complications, and/or liver complications of patients with NAFLD over long-term follow-up.
METHODS: A cohort of well-characterized patients with NAFLD diagnosed during the period of 1980-2000 was identified through the Rochester Epidemiology Project. The NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) was used to separate NAFLD patients with and without advanced liver fibrosis. We used the NFS score to classify the probability of fibrosis as < -1.5 for low probability, > -1.5 to < 0.67 for intermediate probability, and > 0.67 for high probability. Primary endpoints included all-cause death and cardiovascular- and/or liver-related mortality. From the 479 patients with NAFLD assessed, 302 patients (63%) greater than 18 years old were included. All patients were followed, and medical charts were reviewed until August 31, 2009 or the date when the first primary endpoint occurred. By using a standardized case record form, we recorded a detailed history and physical examination and the use of statins and metformin during the follow-up period.
RESULTS: A total of 302/479 (63%) NAFLD patients (mean age: 47 ± 13 year) were included with a follow-up period of 12.0 ± 3.9 year. A low probability of advanced fibrosis (NFS < -1.5 at baseline) was found in 181 patients (60%), while an intermediate or high probability of advanced fibrosis (NSF > -1.5) was found in 121 patients (40%). At the end of the follow-up period, 55 patients (18%) developed primary endpoints. A total of 39 patients (13%) died during the follow-up. The leading causes of death were non-hepatic malignancy (n = 13/39; 33.3%), coronary heart disease (CHD) (n = 8/39; 20.5%), and liver-related mortality (n = 5/39; 12.8%). Thirty patients had new-onset CHD, whereas 8 of 30 patients (27%) died from CHD-related causes during the follow-up. In a multivariate analysis, a higher NFS at baseline and the presence of new-onset CHD were significantly predictive of death (OR = 2.6 and 9.2, respectively; P < 0.0001). Our study showed a significant, graded relationship between the NFS, as classified into 3 subgroups (low, intermediate and high probability of liver fibrosis), and the occurrence of primary endpoints. The use of metformin or simvastatin for at least 3 mo during the follow-up was associated with fewer deaths in patients with NAFLD (OR = 0.2 and 0.03, respectively; P < 0.05). Additionally, the rate of annual NFS change in patients with an intermediate or high probability of advanced liver fibrosis was significantly lower than those patients with a low probability of advanced liver fibrosis (0.06 vs 0.09, P = 0.004). The annual NFS change in patients who died was significantly higher than those in patients who survived (0.14 vs 0.07, P = 0.03). At the end of the follow-up, we classified the patients into 3 subgroups according to the progression pattern of liver fibrosis by comparing the NFS at baseline to the NFS at the end of the follow-up period. Most patients were in the stable-fibrosis (60%) and progressive-fibrosis (37%) groups, whereas only 3% were in the regressive fibrosis.
CONCLUSION: A higher NAFLD fibrosis score at baseline and a new onset of CHD were significantly predictive of death in patients with NAFLD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver complications; Mortality; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score; Prognostic predictor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23482703      PMCID: PMC3587478          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i8.1219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  37 in total

1.  Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Cholesterol lowering with statin drugs, risk of stroke, and total mortality. An overview of randomized trials.

Authors:  P R Hebert; J M Gaziano; K S Chan; C H Hennekens
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Jul 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 4.  Drugs improving insulin resistance for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and/or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors:  F Angelico; M Burattin; C Alessandri; M Del Ben; F Lirussi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

Review 5.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Leon A Adams; Keith D Lindor
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Pathology of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Brunt
Journal:  Hepatol Res       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 4.288

Review 7.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sombat Treeprasertsuk; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Keith D Lindor
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Patients with elevated liver enzymes are not at higher risk for statin hepatotoxicity.

Authors:  Naga Chalasani; Hisham Aljadhey; Joe Kesterson; Michael D Murray; Stephen D Hall
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Development and validation of a simple NAFLD clinical scoring system for identifying patients without advanced disease.

Authors:  S A Harrison; D Oliver; H L Arnold; S Gogia; B A Neuschwander-Tetri
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Efficacy of rosuvastatin for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with dyslipidemia: An open-label, pilot study.

Authors:  Takashi Nakahara; Hideyuki Hyogo; Yuki Kimura; Tomokazu Ishitobi; Koji Arihiro; Hiroshi Aikata; Shoichi Takahashi; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Hepatol Res       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.288

View more
  40 in total

1.  Noninvasive Biomarkers of Liver Fibrosis: Clinical Applications and Future Directions.

Authors:  Daniel L Motola; Peter Caravan; Raymond T Chung; Bryan C Fuchs
Journal:  Curr Pathobiol Rep       Date:  2014-12-01

2.  Association between non-invasive liver fibrosis scores and occurrence of health adverse outcomes in older people.

Authors:  Antonio De Vincentis; Luisa Costanzo; Umberto Vespasiani-Gentilucci; Antonio Picardi; Stefania Bandinelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi; Claudio Pedone
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2019-02-03       Impact factor: 4.088

3.  Liver fibrosis scores predict liver disease mortality in the United States population.

Authors:  Aynur Unalp-Arida; Constance E Ruhl
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 4.  Clinical differences between alcoholic liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Toshikuni; Mikihiro Tsutsumi; Tomiyasu Arisawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Composite prognostic models across the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease spectrum: Clinical application in developing countries.

Authors:  Hilmar K Lückhoff; Frederik C Kruger; Maritha J Kotze
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-05-28

6.  The impact of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score on cardiac prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Tetsuya Takahashi; Tetsu Watanabe; Tetsuro Shishido; Ken Watanabe; Takayuki Sugai; Taku Toshima; Daisuke Kinoshita; Miyuki Yokoyama; Harutoshi Tamura; Satoshi Nishiyama; Takanori Arimoto; Hiroki Takahashi; Tamon Yamanaka; Takuya Miyamoto; Isao Kubota
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: what the clinician needs to know.

Authors:  Mariana Verdelho Machado; Helena Cortez-Pinto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Clinical approaches to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Katherine J P Schwenger; Johane P Allard
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Noninvasive evaluation of NAFLD.

Authors:  Laurent Castera; Valérie Vilgrain; Paul Angulo
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 10.  Global Epidemiology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Perspectives on US Minority Populations.

Authors:  Zaki A Sherif; Armana Saeed; Shima Ghavimi; Seyed-Mehdi Nouraie; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Hassan Brim; Hassan Ashktorab
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.