Literature DB >> 23482572

Technical note: validation of rumination collars for beef cattle.

C Goldhawk1, K Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K A Beauchemin.   

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to evaluate a wireless rumination monitoring system (Hi-Tag; SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel) for recording rumination in beef cattle. The system operates based on acoustics of rumination and has been used previously for monitoring rumination in both young and adult dairy cattle. Study 1 consisted of beef cattle in tie-stall housing with 72 observations for 4 cattle fed a high forage backgrounding diet and 47 observations for 3 cattle fed a high grain finishing diet. Study 2 consisted of 44 observations for 6 beef cattle fed a high forage diet in a loose-housing feedlot pen. Each observation consisted of the rumination time during a 2-h period as estimated by visual observations made by trained observers (inter-observer correlation r = 0.97) and the Hi-Tag system. The mean difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was 9.8 ± 18.7 min/2 h. The rumination times from the Hi-Tag system were only moderately correlated with visual observations (r = 0.41, P < 0.001). The difference between visual and Hi-Tag rumination times was not correlated with head posture during the 2 h period (r = -0.02, P = 0.89). Physical and dietary differences between dairy and beef cattle may have resulted in the inaccuracy of the Hi-Tag system when used in beef cattle fed typical backgrounding and finishing diets. More work is required to improve the accuracy of this automated system for rumination monitoring before it can be used reliably with beef cattle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automation; beef; behavior; cattle; rumination

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23482572     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  3 in total

1.  Technical note: validation of a system for monitoring individual behavior in beef heifers.

Authors:  Victória R Merenda; Odinei Marques; Emily K Miller-Cushon; Nicolas Dilorenzo; Jimena Laporta; Ricardo C Chebel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The Equipment Used in the SF6 Technique to Estimate Methane Emissions Has No Major Effect on Dairy Cow Behavior.

Authors:  Fabiellen Cristina Pereira; Dayane Lemos Teixeira; Laura Ann Boyle; Luiz Carlos Pinheiro Machado Filho; Shaun Richard Owen Williams; Daniel Enriquez-Hidalgo
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-29

3.  Validation of NEDAP Monitoring Technology for Measurements of Feeding, Rumination, Lying, and Standing Behaviors, and Comparison with Visual Observation and Video Recording in Buffaloes.

Authors:  Ray Adil Quddus; Nisar Ahmad; Anjum Khalique; Jalees Ahmed Bhatti
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.