Stephen J Vincent1, Michael J Collins, Scott A Read, Leo G Carney. 1. Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. sj.vincent@qut.edu.au.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We compared the retinal thickness (RT) and choroidal thickness (ChT) between the fellow eyes of nonamblyopic myopic anisometropes. METHODS: The eyes of 22 nonamblyopic myopic anisometropes (≥ 1 diopter [D] spherical equivalent refraction [SER] anisometropia) were examined using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Customized software was used to register, align, and average multiple foveal OCT B-scan images from each subject to enhance image quality. Two independent masked observers manually determined the RT and ChT from each SD-OCT image up to 2.5 mm nasal and temporal to the fovea. Axial length (AXL) was measured using optical low coherence biometry during relaxed accommodation. RESULTS: The mean SER anisometropia was 1.74 ± 0.95 D and the mean interocular AXL difference was 0.58 ± 0.41 mm. There was no significant difference in foveal RT between the fellow eyes (P > 0.05). Mean subfoveal ChT was significantly thinner in the more myopic eye (252 ± 46 μm) compared to the fellow, less myopic eye (286 ± 58 μm) (P < 0.001). There was a moderate correlation between the interocular difference in subfoveal ChT and the interocular difference in AXL (r = -0.50, P < 0.01). Asian anisometropes displayed more regionally symmetrical (nasal-temporal) interocular differences in ChT profile compared to Caucasians. CONCLUSIONS: RT was similar between the fellow eyes of myopic anisometropes; however, the subfoveal choroid was significantly thinner in the more myopic (longer) eye of this anisometropic cohort. The interocular asymmetry in ChT correlated with the interocular difference in AXL.
PURPOSE: We compared the retinal thickness (RT) and choroidal thickness (ChT) between the fellow eyes of nonamblyopic myopic anisometropes. METHODS: The eyes of 22 nonamblyopic myopic anisometropes (≥ 1 diopter [D] spherical equivalent refraction [SER] anisometropia) were examined using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Customized software was used to register, align, and average multiple foveal OCT B-scan images from each subject to enhance image quality. Two independent masked observers manually determined the RT and ChT from each SD-OCT image up to 2.5 mm nasal and temporal to the fovea. Axial length (AXL) was measured using optical low coherence biometry during relaxed accommodation. RESULTS: The mean SER anisometropia was 1.74 ± 0.95 D and the mean interocular AXL difference was 0.58 ± 0.41 mm. There was no significant difference in foveal RT between the fellow eyes (P > 0.05). Mean subfoveal ChT was significantly thinner in the more myopic eye (252 ± 46 μm) compared to the fellow, less myopic eye (286 ± 58 μm) (P < 0.001). There was a moderate correlation between the interocular difference in subfoveal ChT and the interocular difference in AXL (r = -0.50, P < 0.01). Asian anisometropes displayed more regionally symmetrical (nasal-temporal) interocular differences in ChT profile compared to Caucasians. CONCLUSIONS: RT was similar between the fellow eyes of myopic anisometropes; however, the subfoveal choroid was significantly thinner in the more myopic (longer) eye of this anisometropic cohort. The interocular asymmetry in ChT correlated with the interocular difference in AXL.
Authors: Yuchun Tsai; Bin Lu; Alexander V Ljubimov; Sergey Girman; Fred N Ross-Cisneros; Alfredo A Sadun; Clive N Svendsen; Robert M Cohen; Shaomei Wang Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jie Lu; Hao Zhou; Yingying Shi; James Choe; Mengxi Shen; Liang Wang; Kelly Chen; Qinqin Zhang; William J Feuer; Giovanni Gregori; Philip J Rosenfeld; Ruikang K Wang Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2022-01
Authors: Kemal Tekin; Veysel Cankurtaran; Merve Inanc; Mehmet Ali Sekeroglu; Pelin Yilmazbas Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2016-06-04 Impact factor: 2.031