Literature DB >> 2348230

Prognostic significance of actual dose intensity in diffuse large-cell lymphoma: results of a tree-structured survival analysis.

L W Kwak1, J Halpern, R A Olshen, S J Horning.   

Abstract

While diffuse large-cell lymphoma (DLCL) is considered to be highly curable with current therapy, treatment failures are observed even with intensive combination chemotherapy regimens. In order to study the prognostic significance of actual dose intensity of chemotherapy in DLCL, we retrospectively analyzed 115 previously untreated patients treated as Stanford between 1975 and 1986 with cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), methotrexate, bleomycin, Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone ([M]BACOD), or methotrexate, Adriamycin, cyclosphosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin (MACOP-B). The actual relative dose intensity (RDI), the amount of drug actually administered to each patient during the first 12 weeks of therapy, was calculated as standardized to CHOP and analyzed in addition to clinical factors prognostic for survival by univariate analysis. Multivariate recursive partitioning (tree-structured) survival analysis identified the actual RDI of Adriamycin greater than 75% as the single most important predictor of survival. A model incorporating the actual RDI of Adriamycin and performance status, in combination with serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and extranodal disease, defined three overall prognostic groups of patients with respective 3-year survival rates of 89%, 63%, and 18%. The three prognostic groups remained distinct, even when restricted to complete responders. This model was also predictive of survival when dose intensity was analyzed relative to the optimum dose defined for each of the three regimens and when applied to a subgroup of patients aged 50 years or younger. We conclude that actual RDI is an important prognostic factor for survival in DLCL and that analysis of RDI early in the course of treatment may allow modification of the treatment plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2348230     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.6.963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  79 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with chemotherapy in combination with filgrastim.

Authors:  Jeff Schriber
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. More is better, or is it?

Authors:  D J Dodwell; E S de Campos; J A Radford
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Managing neutropenia in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy in a community setting.

Authors:  Irene Q Flores; William Ershler
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.027

4.  Phase I trial of infusional cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Abdissa Negassa; Erick Lansigan; Robin Locke; Chamath R De Silva; Peter H Wiernik
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Predictors of chemotherapy dose reduction at first cycle in patients age 65 years and older with solid tumors.

Authors:  Ajeet Gajra; Heidi D Klepin; Tao Feng; William P Tew; Supriya G Mohile; Cynthia Owusu; Cary P Gross; Stuart M Lichtman; Tanya M Wildes; Andrew E Chapman; Efrat Dotan; Vani Katheria; Laura Zavala; Chie Akiba; Arti Hurria
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  A randomized controlled trial investigating the survival benefit of dose-intensified multidrug combination chemotherapy (LSG9) for intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9002.

Authors:  Tomohiro Kinoshita; Tomomitsu Hotta; Kensei Tobinai; Tohru Kobayashi; Naoki Ishizuka; Masao Tomonaga; Toshiaki Sai; Youichiro Ohno; Masaharu Kasai; Michinori Ogura; Chikara Mikuni; Hironobu Toki; Masayuki Sano; Yasufumi Masaki; Tomoko Ohtsu; Yoshihiro Matsuno; Takeaki Takenaka; Shigeru Shirakawa; Masanori Shimoyama
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.490

7.  A Host-Dependent Prognostic Model for Elderly Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Miura; Jun Konishi; Takaaki Miyake; Masanori Makita; Atsuko Hojo; Yasufumi Masaki; Masatoshi Uno; Jun Ozaki; Chikamasa Yoshida; Daigo Niiya; Koichi Kitazume; Yoshinobu Maeda; Jun Takizawa; Rika Sakai; Tomofumi Yano; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Kazutaka Sunami; Yasushi Hiramatsu; Kazutoshi Aoyama; Hideki Tsujimura; Jun Murakami; Yoshihiro Hatta; Masatoshi Kanno
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-04-13

8.  Impact of sarcopenia on treatment tolerance in United States veterans with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Daphne Y Xiao; Suhong Luo; Katiuscia O'Brian; Arun Ganti; Peter Riedell; Kristen M Sanfilippo; Ryan C Lynch; Weijian Liu; Kenneth R Carson
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 10.047

9.  Tumor volume and patient weight as predictors of outcome in children with intermediate risk rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  David A Rodeberg; Julie A Stoner; Norbert Garcia-Henriquez; R Lor Randall; Sheri L Spunt; Carola A Arndt; Simon Kao; Charles N Paidas; Lynn Million; Douglas S Hawkins
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Treatment when prognostic factors do not match St. Gallen recommendations: profiling of prognostic factors among HR(+) and HER2(-) breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Kyoko Satoh; Maki Tanaka; Ayako Yano; Jiang Ying; Tatsuyuki Kakuma
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.