Literature DB >> 23481512

Biomarker analysis in oesophagogastric cancer: Results from the REAL3 and TransMAGIC trials.

A F C Okines1, D Gonzalez de Castro1, D Cunningham2, I Chau1, R E Langley3, L C Thompson3, S P Stenning3, C Saffery1, Y Barbachano1, F Coxon4, G Middleton5, D Ferry6, T Crosby7, S Madhusudan8, J Wadsley9, J Waters10, M Hall11, D Swinson12, A Robinson13, D Smith14, J S Reis-Filho15, T S Waddell1, L Puckey1, S Hulkki Wilson1, Z Eltahir1, M Band1, A Wotherspoon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: REAL3 (Randomised ECF for Advanced or Locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer 3) was a phase II/III trial designed to evaluate the addition of panitumumab (P) to epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine (EOC) in untreated advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma, or undifferentiated carcinoma. MAGIC (MRC Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy) was a phase III study which demonstrated that peri-operative epirubicin, cisplatin and infused 5-fluorouracil (ECF) improved survival in early oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analysis of response rate (RR; the primary end-point of phase II) and biomarkers in the first 200 patients randomised to EOC or modified dose (m) EOC+P in REAL3 was pre-planned to determine if molecular selection for the on-going study was indicated. KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations and PTEN expression were assessed in pre-treatment biopsies and results correlated with response to mEOC+P. Association between these biomarkers and overall survival (OS) was assessed in MAGIC patients to determine any prognostic effect.
RESULTS: RR was 52% to mEOC+P, 48% to EOC. Results from 175 assessable biopsies: mutations in KRAS (5.7%), BRAF (0%), PIK3CA (2.5%) and loss of PTEN expression (15.0%). None of the biomarkers evaluated predicted resistance to mEOC+P. In MAGIC, mutations in KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA and loss of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) were found in 6.3%, 1.0%, 5.0% and 10.9%, respectively, and were not associated with survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The RR of 52% in REAL3 with mEOC+P met pre-defined criteria to continue accrual to phase III. The frequency of the mutations was too low to exclude any prognostic or predictive effect.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23481512     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  22 in total

1.  Combination of cetuximab with radio-chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: less is more!

Authors:  Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz; Melanie Kripp; Sylvie Lorenzen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  [Use of cetuximab with definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer results in decreased overall survival].

Authors:  N H Nicolay; K Herfarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Molecular classification of gastric adenocarcinoma: translating new insights from the cancer genome atlas research network.

Authors:  Yu Sunakawa; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-04

4.  Biologics in combination with chemotherapy for gastric cancer: is this the answer?

Authors:  Nikolaos Charalampakis; Elena Elimova; Yusuke Shimodaira; Hironori Shiozaki; Roopma Wadhwa; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.889

5.  Prognostic Biomarkers in Early-stage Gastric Adenocarcinoma Treated With Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Eirini Pectasides; Ioannis Chatzidakis; Vassiliki Kotoula; Georgia-Angeliki Koliou; Kyriaki Papadopoulou; Eleni Giannoulatou; Vasilios G Giannouzakos; Mattheos Bobos; Christos Papavasileiou; Sofia Chrisafi; Aikaterini Florou; Dimitrios Pectasides; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.069

6.  Prospective comprehensive genomic profiling of advanced gastric carcinoma cases reveals frequent clinically relevant genomic alterations and new routes for targeted therapies.

Authors:  Siraj M Ali; Eric M Sanford; Samuel J Klempner; Douglas A Rubinson; Kai Wang; Norma A Palma; Juliann Chmielecki; Roman Yelensky; Gary A Palmer; Deborah Morosini; Doron Lipson; Daniel V Catenacci; Fadi Braiteh; Rachel Erlich; Philip J Stephens; Jeffrey S Ross; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Vincent A Miller
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 7.  Medical management of gastric cancer: a 2014 update.

Authors:  Elena Elimova; Hironori Shiozaki; Roopma Wadhwa; Kazuki Sudo; Qiongrong Chen; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Mariela A Blum; Brian Badgwell; Prajnan Das; Shumei Song; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Predictive biomarker candidates for the response of gastric cancer to targeted and cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  Hark Kyun Kim; Jeffrey E Green
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.533

9.  PTEN loss is associated with a poor response to trastuzumab in HER2-overexpressing gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yasunori Deguchi; Hiroshi Okabe; Nobu Oshima; Shigeo Hisamori; Sachiko Minamiguchi; Manabu Muto; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 10.  Targeted Therapies for Advanced Oesophagogastric Cancer: Recent Progress and Future Directions.

Authors:  Kate Young; Ian Chau
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 11.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.