BACKGROUND: Based on a stress-coping framework, the present study investigates the relationship between discrimination and substance use, and the moderating effects of gender. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzes data from Latina/o young adults aged 18-25 (N = 401) from Brooklyn, New York. Multinomial logistic regression was used to test the association between discrimination and substance use. RESULTS: Discrimination was significantly associated with increased odds of substance use adjusting for covariates (e.g. age, education). Gender was a moderator. Discrimination was associated with increased risk of alcohol/cannabis and hard drug use among young Latina women. However, discrimination was associated with decreased risk of alcohol/cannabis use and increased risk of hard drug use among young Latino men. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that discrimination is generally associated with risk for substance use, but further that the outcomes vary by gender. Future research should explore gender-specific dimensions of discrimination and their associations with other outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Based on a stress-coping framework, the present study investigates the relationship between discrimination and substance use, and the moderating effects of gender. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzes data from Latina/o young adults aged 18-25 (N = 401) from Brooklyn, New York. Multinomial logistic regression was used to test the association between discrimination and substance use. RESULTS: Discrimination was significantly associated with increased odds of substance use adjusting for covariates (e.g. age, education). Gender was a moderator. Discrimination was associated with increased risk of alcohol/cannabis and hard drug use among young Latina women. However, discrimination was associated with decreased risk of alcohol/cannabis use and increased risk of hard drug use among young Latino men. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that discrimination is generally associated with risk for substance use, but further that the outcomes vary by gender. Future research should explore gender-specific dimensions of discrimination and their associations with other outcomes.
Authors: Samuel R Friedman; Peter L Flom; Benny J Kottiri; Jonathan Zenilman; Richard Curtis; Alan Neaigus; Milagros Sandoval; Thomas Quinn; Don C Des Jarlais Journal: Addiction Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: P L Flom; S R Friedman; B J Kottiri; A Neaigus; R Curtis; D C Des Jarlais; M Sandoval; J M Zenilman Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Angie Denisse Otiniano Verissimo; Christine E Grella; Hortensia Amaro; Gilbert C Gee Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: India J Ornelas; Gwen T Lapham; Hugo Salgado; Emily C Williams; Nathan Gotman; Veronica Womack; Sonia Davis; Frank Penedo; Sylvia Smoller; Linda C Gallo Journal: J Ethn Subst Abuse Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 1.507
Authors: Yajaira A Cabrera Tineo; Frank R Dillon; Melissa M Ertl; Roberto Rentería; Mario De La Rosa Journal: Int J Ment Health Addict Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 3.836
Authors: Billy A Caceres; Veronica Barcelona; Danny Vo; Niurka Suero-Tejeda; Kasey Jackman; Jacquelyn Taylor; Elizabeth Corwin Journal: Biol Res Nurs Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 2.318