Literature DB >> 23481277

Prospective controlled study to evaluate laboratory and clinical outcomes of oocyte vitrification obtained in in vitro fertilization patients aged 30 to 39 years.

Ching-Chien Chang1, Thomas A Elliott, Graham Wright, Daniel B Shapiro, Andrew A Toledo, Zsolt Peter Nagy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the process of oocyte vitrification affects oocyte viability in in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients between 30 and 39 years of age.
DESIGN: Prospective controlled study.
SETTING: Private IVF practice. PATIENT(S): A total of 30 women assigned and 22 qualified. INTERVENTION(S): Denudation of oocytes, cryopreservation of oocytes using vitrification method in a medium with 15% ethylene glycol (EG), 15% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), and 0.5 M sucrose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Oocyte survival, fertilization, day-3 embryo quality, blastocyst formation, clinical pregnancy, implantation, and live-birth rates. RESULT(S): After denudation of oocytes, mature sibling oocytes were randomly allocated to the fresh and vitrified groups. The survival rate was 79.6% after vitrification/warming. Overall, no statistically significant differences were found in fertilization, day-3 embryo quality, or blastocyst formation rates between the fresh and vitrified groups. The positive β-human chorionic gonadotropin, clinical pregnancy rate, and implantation rate were 13 (59.0%) of 22, 10 (45.4%) of 22, and 16 (30.1%) of 53 for the vitrified group. The overall efficiency in achieving a live birth was 11 (5.9%) of 186 per vitrified oocyte. CONCLUSION(S): The impact of vitrification can be reduced to a minimal level, making it possible to achieve high pregnancy and implantation rates in this age group of IVF patients.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23481277     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  12 in total

1.  A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Ho; Irene Woo; Kristin Louie; Wael Salem; Sami I Jabara; Kristin A Bendikson; Richard J Paulson; Karine Chung
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Systematic review of fertility preservation options in transgender patients: a guide for plastic surgeons.

Authors:  Maria Yan; Samyd S Bustos; Doga Kuruoglu; Pedro Ciudad; Antonio J Forte; Esther A Kim; Gabriel Del Corral; Oscar J Manrique
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

3.  Vitrification-induced activation of lysosomal cathepsin B perturbs spindle assembly checkpoint function in mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Ahmed Z Balboula; Karen Schindler; Tomoya Kotani; Manabu Kawahara; Masashi Takahashi
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  Fertility awareness and attitudes among resident physicians across different specialties.

Authors:  Shelun Tsai; Tracy Truong; Jennifer L Eaton
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Decision making processes of women who seek elective oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Ran Kim; Tae Ki Yoon; Inn Soo Kang; Mi Kyoung Koong; Yoo Shin Kim; Myung Joo Kim; Yubin Lee; Jayeon Kim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Social Freezing in Medical Practice. Experiences and Attitudes of Gynecologists in Germany.

Authors:  Maximilian Schochow; Giovanni Rubeis; Grit Büchner-Mögling; Hansjakob Fries; Florian Steger
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  The total pregnancy potential per oocyte aspiration after assisted reproduction-in how many cycles are biologically competent oocytes available?

Authors:  J G Lemmen; N M Rodríguez; L D Andreasen; A Loft; S Ziebe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.357

8.  Prevalence of a Good Perinatal Outcome With Cryopreserved Compared With Fresh Donor Oocytes.

Authors:  Jennifer L Eaton; Tracy Truong; Yi-Ju Li; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 7.623

9.  Effects of Different Maturation Systems on Bovine Oocyte Quality, Plasma Membrane Phospholipid Composition and Resistance to Vitrification and Warming.

Authors:  José F W Sprícigo; Mateus N Diógenes; Ligiane O Leme; Ana L Guimarães; Carolle V Muterlle; Bianca Damiani Marques Silva; David Solà-Oriol; Ivo Pivato; Luciano Paulino Silva; Margot A N Dode
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Production of Live Offspring from Vitrified-Warmed Oocytes Collected at Metaphase I Stage.

Authors:  Ching-Chien Chang; Wei-Fang Chang; Jie Xu; An-Sheng Cheng; Chia-Chun Chang; Zsolt Peter Nagy; Cho-Chen Yang; Shih-Torng Ding; Li-Ying Sung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.