Literature DB >> 23481025

Educational antimicrobial susceptibility testing as a critical component of microbiology laboratory proficiency programs: American Proficiency Institute results for 2007-2011.

Ronald N Jones1, Teri Glick, Helio S Sader, Robert K Flamm, James E Ross, Paul R Rhomberg, Daniel C Edson.   

Abstract

External laboratory proficiency programs are an important requirement for test quality assurance (EQA) and compliance to regulatory guidelines (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments and inspections). The American Proficiency Institute (API) regularly distributes EQA sample challenges (test events) including an Educational Sample (ES) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Beginning in 2007, API has sent 3 ES samples annually, each a well-characterized (molecular/phenotypic methods) strain having an interesting/emerging mechanism of resistance. Hundreds of USA laboratories, usually serving small- to medium-size hospitals and clinics, participate in the API ungraded ES test event. Analysis of responses is made and reported electronically as ES critiques addressing contemporary susceptibility testing issues that affect patient therapy. Seven Gram-positive (+) and 8 Gram-negative (-) ES strains were tested over the 5 years (2007-2011) with organism identification (graded) accuracy of 95.3% (range, 91.0-99.2%) for Gram (-) and 97.0% (range, 94.2-100.0%) for Gram (+) challenges. Susceptibility testing categorical accuracy was generally greatest for the disk diffusion test (91.0/97.0%) compared to the MIC methods (commercial automated or manual) combined (89.9/96.1%, for Gram [-]/Gram [+], respectively). The most worrisome observations of these ES samples were as follows: 1) poor recognition of ESBL- and serine carbapenemase-producing strains (various types including Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapanemase) due to delayed application of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [CLSI] guidelines; 2) overcalling of ESBL in organisms having wild-type non-ESBL enzymes (OXA series; OXA, 1/30) due to commercial system or participant interpretive error; and 3) occasional drug-bug discords noted in nonfermentative Gram (-) bacilli. In conclusion, the API ES series of ungraded susceptibility testing challenges (accuracy was >90%) has been well received by subscribers and has provided detailed educational opportunities to improve laboratory testing performance. ES samples have delivered guidance to enable laboratories to rapidly comply with CLSI document changes of interpretive breakpoints such as those for β-lactams when testing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; the program was sustained into 2012 and beyond to document quality of susceptibility tests in USA laboratories.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23481025     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  3 in total

1.  Spontaneous Fungal Ascites Infection in Patients with Cirrhosis: An Analysis of 10 Cases.

Authors:  Beiling Li; Chao Yang; Zhiping Qian; Yan Huang; Xianbo Wang; Guotao Zhong; Jinjun Chen
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2021-03-11

2.  Eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and persister cells using an electrochemical scaffold and enhanced antibiotic susceptibility.

Authors:  Sujala T Sultana; Douglas R Call; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 7.290

3.  Reporting antimicrobial susceptibilities and resistance phenotypes in Staphylococcus spp.: a nationwide proficiency study.

Authors:  Felipe Fernández-Cuenca; Inmaculada López-Hernández; Emilia Cercenado; Carmen Conejo; Nuria Tormo; Concha Gimeno; Alvaro Pascual
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 5.790

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.