OBJECTIVE: To determine whether telephone-based smoking cessation follow-up counseling (FC), when delivered as part of a multi-component intervention program is associated with increased rates of follow-up support and smoking abstinence. METHODS: A cluster randomized controlled-trial was conducted within family medicine practices in Ontario, Canada. Consecutive adult patients who smoked were enrolled at two time points, the baseline period (2009) and the post-intervention period (2009-2011). Smoking abstinence was determined by telephone interview 4 months following enrollment. Both groups implemented a multi-component intervention program. Practices randomized to the FC group could also refer patients to a follow-up support program which involved 5 telephone contacts over a 2-month period. RESULTS:Eight practices, 130 providers, and 928 eligible patients participated in the study. No statistically significant difference in 7-day point-prevalence abstinence was observed between intervention groups. There was a significant increase in referral to follow-up in both intervention groups. Significantly higher rates of smoking abstinence [25.7% vs. 11.3%; adjusted OR 3.1 (95% CI: 1.1, 8.6), p<0.05] were documented among the twenty-nine percent of FC participants who were referred to the follow-up support program compared to the MC group. CONCLUSION: Access to external follow-up support did not increase rates at which follow-up support was delivered.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether telephone-based smoking cessation follow-up counseling (FC), when delivered as part of a multi-component intervention program is associated with increased rates of follow-up support and smoking abstinence. METHODS: A cluster randomized controlled-trial was conducted within family medicine practices in Ontario, Canada. Consecutive adult patients who smoked were enrolled at two time points, the baseline period (2009) and the post-intervention period (2009-2011). Smoking abstinence was determined by telephone interview 4 months following enrollment. Both groups implemented a multi-component intervention program. Practices randomized to the FC group could also refer patients to a follow-up support program which involved 5 telephone contacts over a 2-month period. RESULTS: Eight practices, 130 providers, and 928 eligible patients participated in the study. No statistically significant difference in 7-day point-prevalence abstinence was observed between intervention groups. There was a significant increase in referral to follow-up in both intervention groups. Significantly higher rates of smoking abstinence [25.7% vs. 11.3%; adjusted OR 3.1 (95% CI: 1.1, 8.6), p<0.05] were documented among the twenty-nine percent of FCparticipants who were referred to the follow-up support program compared to the MC group. CONCLUSION: Access to external follow-up support did not increase rates at which follow-up support was delivered.
Authors: Nancy A Rigotti; Yuchiao Chang; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Sandra J Japuntich; Elyse R Park; Hilary A Tindle; Douglas E Levy; Zachary Z Reid; Joanna Streck; Timothy Gomperts; Jennifer H K Kelley; Daniel E Singer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sophia Papadakis; Adam G Cole; Robert D Reid; Roxane Assi; Marie Gharib; Heather E Tulloch; Kerri-Anne Mullen; George Wells; Andrew L Pipe Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Nancy A Rigotti; Susan Regan; Douglas E Levy; Sandra Japuntich; Yuchiao Chang; Elyse R Park; Joseph C Viana; Jennifer H K Kelley; Michele Reyen; Daniel E Singer Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sophia Papadakis; Adam G Cole; Robert D Reid; Mustafa Coja; Debbie Aitken; Kerri-Anne Mullen; Marie Gharib; Andrew L Pipe Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Charis Girvalaki; Sophia Papadakis; Enkeleint A Mechili; Katerina Nikitara; Andrey Demin; Antigona C Trofor; Arben Lila; Arusyak Harutyunyan; Aurela Saliaj; Deska Dimitrievska; Francisco Rodriguez Lozano; George Bakhturidze; Javier Ayesta; Krzysztof Przewoźniak; Maria Sofia Cattaruzza; Marija Zdraveska; Mihaela Lovše; Biljana Kilibarda; Otto Stoyka; Panagiotis Behrakis; Pierre Bizel; Polina Starchenko; Shkumbin Spahija; Cornel Radu-Loghin; Constantine I Vardavas Journal: Tob Induc Dis Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 2.600
Authors: Joan L Bottorff; Cherisse L Seaton; Nancy Viney; Sean Stolp; Sandra Krueckl; Nikolai Holm Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2015-09-18