| Literature DB >> 23480774 |
A Simon1, B Asli, M Braun-Falco, H De Koning, J-P Fermand, C Grattan, K Krause, H Lachmann, C Lenormand, V Martinez-Taboada, M Maurer, M Peters, R Rizzi, F Rongioletti, T Ruzicka, L Schnitzler, B Schubert, J Sibilia, D Lipsker.
Abstract
Schnitzler's syndrome is characterized by recurrent urticarial rash and monoclonal gammopathy, associated with clinical and biological signs of inflammation and a long-term risk of AA amyloidosis and overt lymphoproliferation. An extensive literature review was performed, and the following questions were addressed during an expert meeting: In whom should Schnitzler's syndrome be suspected? How should the diagnosis of Schnitzler's syndrome be established? How should a patient with Schnitzler's syndrome be treated? How should a patient with Schnitzler's syndrome be followed up?. A diagnosis of Schnitzler's syndrome is considered definite in any patient with two obligate criteria: a recurrent urticarial rash and a monoclonal IgM gammopathy, and two of the following minor criteria: recurrent fever, objective signs of abnormal bone remodeling, elevated CRP level or leukocytosis, and a neutrophilic infiltrate on skin biopsy. It is considered probable, if only 1 minor criterion is present. In patients with monoclonal IgG gammopathies, diagnosis is definite if three minor criteria are present and possible if two are present. First-line treatment in patients with significant alteration of quality of life or persistent elevation of markers of inflammation should be anakinra. Follow-up should include clinical evaluation, CBC and CRP every 3 months and MGUS as usually recommended.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23480774 DOI: 10.1111/all.12129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Allergy ISSN: 0105-4538 Impact factor: 13.146