Literature DB >> 2348022

Temporal window shape as a function of frequency and level.

C J Plack1, B C Moore.   

Abstract

In an earlier article [Moore et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1102-1116 (1988)], preliminary work on the temporal-window model of temporal resolution in the auditory system was described. The temporal window is conceived of as a temporal integrator that slides in time and that is implemented as an intensity-weighting function. The shape of the temporal window was estimated by measuring the threshold for a brief sinusoidal signal presented in a temporal gap between two bursts of noise as a function of the duration of the gap and the position of the signal within the gap. In this paper, a much more thorough examination of the effects of level and frequency on the shape of the window is presented, using the same basic technique. Temporal window shapes were measured at four different frequencies (300, 900, 2700, and 8100 Hz) and at three different masker levels covering a 20-dB range at each frequency. The shape of the temporal window was well described by modeling each side as the sum of two rounded-exponential (roex) functions. The equivalent rectangular duration (ERD) of the window decreased from about 13 to 9 ms as the center frequency increased from 300 to 900 Hz, but decreased only slightly, to 7 ms, as the center frequency increased to 8100. The greater ERD at 300 Hz does not seem to be explicable in terms of "ringing" in the auditory filter. The ERD decreased somewhat with increasing level, for example, having a value of about 10 ms at 2700 Hz with a 20-dB masker spectrum level and about 7 ms with a 40-dB masker spectrum level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2348022     DOI: 10.1121/1.399185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  27 in total

1.  Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kyu Hwan Jung; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Gary Miyasaki; Susan J Norton; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 2.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Processing asymmetry of transitions between order and disorder in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maria Chait; David Poeppel; Alain de Cheveigné; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Auditory temporal edge detection in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maria Chait; David Poeppel; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Effects of non-simultaneous masking on the binaural masking level difference.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall Iii
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The monaural temporal window based on masking period pattern data in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Shuman He; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Accounting for nonmonotonic precursor duration effects with gain reduction in the temporal window model.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of noise reduction on AM perception for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D Timothy Ives; Sridhar Kalluri; Olaf Strelcyk; Stanley Sheft; Franck Miermont; Arnaud Coez; Eric Bizaguet; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-05

9.  Brain bases for auditory stimulus-driven figure-ground segregation.

Authors:  Sundeep Teki; Maria Chait; Sukhbinder Kumar; Katharina von Kriegstein; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  "Change deafness" arising from inter-feature masking within a single auditory object.

Authors:  Nicolas Barascud; Timothy D Griffiths; David McAlpine; Maria Chait
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.