Literature DB >> 23480146

Early tumor shrinkage in metastatic colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis from an irinotecan-based randomized first-line trial.

Clemens Giessen1, Ruediger P Laubender, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Andreas Schalhorn, Dominik P Modest, Sebastian Stintzing, Michael Haas, Ulrich R Mansmann, Volker Heinemann.   

Abstract

Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) has been highlighted as a favorable prognostic factor related to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in cytotoxic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Data from a randomized phase III study comparing infusional 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan (FUFIRI) versus irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (mIROX) were evaluated. Patient groups were analyzed according to the relative change in maximum tumor diameter between baseline and after 7 weeks of treatment. The ETS cohort was defined as a decrease of ≥20%. Additionally, the non-ETS cohort was subdivided into "minor shrinkage" (0-19%), "tumor progression" (any increase) and development of "new metastatic lesions". Progression-free survival and OS were estimated in all patient subgroups. Assessment of ETS was possible in 201 patients. Early tumor shrinkage was observed in 47% (94/201) and non-ETS in 53% (107/201) of patients. Patients with ETS had a more favorable outcome with regard to PFS (9.9 months vs 6.1 months, P = 0.029) and OS (27.5 months vs 17.8 months, P = 0.002). In the non-ETS subgroups, patients with "minor shrinkage" (PFS 8.4 months, OS 21.6 months) showed a markedly better outcome than patients with "early tumor progression" (PFS 4.0 months, OS 15.3 months) or with "new metastatic lesions (PFS 2.2 months, OS 7.6 months). In conclusion, ETS assessment offers accelerated response evaluation when compared to RECIST. In patients treated with chemotherapy alone, ETS ≥20% is associated with excellent outcome. Non-ETS is a heterogeneous subgroup where patients with minor shrinkage clearly benefit from treatment, and patients with early progression or development of new lesions have an unfavorable prognosis.
© 2013 Japanese Cancer Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23480146     DOI: 10.1111/cas.12148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Sci        ISSN: 1347-9032            Impact factor:   6.716


  23 in total

1.  Prognostic value of treatment-related factors in metastatic colorectal cancer using a stop-and-go strategy.

Authors:  C J S Kronborg; A R Jensen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF agents: important targeted therapies of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Qing-Yang Feng; Ye Wei; Jing-Wen Chen; Wen-Ju Chang; Le-Chi Ye; De-Xiang Zhu; Jian-Min Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Early tumor shrinkage after first-line medical treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe A Colloca; Antonella Venturino; Domenico Guarneri
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Role of depth of response and MTHFR genotype as predictors of fluorouracil rechallenge therapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ka-Rham Kim; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Hyun-Jeong Shim; Jun-Eul Hwang; Woo-Kyun Bae; Ik-Joo Chung; Hee-Nam Kim; Min-Ho Shin; Sang-Hee Cho
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Analysis of response-related endpoints in trials of first-line medical treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe A Colloca; Antonella Venturino; Domenico Guarneri
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Early Tumor Shrinkage and Depth of Response as Predictors of Favorable Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with FOLFOX Plus Cetuximab (JACCRO CC-05).

Authors:  Akihito Tsuji; Yu Sunakawa; Wataru Ichikawa; Masato Nakamura; Mitsugu Kochi; Tadamichi Denda; Tatsuro Yamaguchi; Ken Shimada; Akinori Takagane; Satoshi Tani; Masahito Kotaka; Hidekazu Kuramochi; Kaoru Furushima; Junichi Koike; Yutaka Yonemura; Masahiro Takeuchi; Masashi Fujii; Toshifusa Nakajima
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.493

7.  SEOM/SERAM consensus statement on radiological diagnosis, response assessment and follow-up in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R García-Carbonero; R Vera; F Rivera; E Parlorio; M Pagés; E González-Flores; C Fernández-Martos; M Á Corral; R Bouzas; F Matute
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Epirubicin combined with oxaliplatin and 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil as a first-line treatment for metastatic gastric cancer: treatment outcomes and analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  Xiaodong Zhu; Xiaoying Zhao; Wei Peng; Si Sun; Jun Cao; Dongmei Ji; Xin Liu; Chenchen Wang; Mingzu Huang; Hui Yu; Weijian Guo; Jin Li; Jiliang Yin
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  The Role of Image-Guided Oncology and Local Tumor Treatments.

Authors:  Jens Ricke; Christiane Bruns; Christoph Dietrich; Maciej Pech; Peter Wust
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-08-07

10.  Assessing prognostic value of early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in first-line therapy for patients with advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Yang; Xinghong Xian; Yongsheng Wang; Meng Qiu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.