Literature DB >> 23479698

MR imaging for acute nontraumatic abdominopelvic pain: rationale and practical considerations.

Michael Lubarsky1, Bobby Kalb, Puneet Sharma, Samuel M Keim, Diego R Martin.   

Abstract

Medical imaging is becoming an increasingly vital component of patient care in the emergency department. Computed tomography has been the diagnostic imaging method of choice for emergency department patients with acute abdominopelvic pain; however, the use of ionizing radiation and the potential need for exogenous contrast material adversely affect patient safety and work flow efficiency, respectively. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging holds promise as an alternative for the evaluation of acute abdominopelvic pain. Critical causes of abdominopelvic pain may be detected with MR imaging without exogenous contrast material. MR imaging is sensitive for depicting tissue or fluid changes related to inflammation, a common process in causes of acute abdominopelvic pain. Fat suppression allows the detection of abnormal signal caused by inflamed tissue. MR imaging has proved sensitive in the detection of acute inflammatory diseases of the gallbladder and bile ducts, liver, pancreas, kidneys, collecting system, bowel, and pelvic soft tissues. Moreover, MR imaging without exogenous contrast material may be safely used in pregnant patients. Evolving roles for emergency department MR imaging include the assessment of vascular disease (including thromboembolic disease) and right upper quadrant pain. Emergency department MR imaging currently has limited availability, and its continued use will require further education regarding operation and image interpretation as well as further validation of cost-effectiveness. Nevertheless, current understanding of the diagnostic utility of this imaging method warrants continued study and the increased use of MR imaging in the evaluation of emergency department patients with acute abdominopelvic pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23479698     DOI: 10.1148/rg.332125116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  6 in total

1.  SAGES guidelines for the use of laparoscopy during pregnancy.

Authors:  Jonathan P Pearl; Raymond R Price; Allison E Tonkin; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Imaging of flank pain: readdressing state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Priyanka Jha; Brian Bentley; Spencer Behr; Judy Yee; Ronald Zagoria
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-09-10

3.  MRI for clinically suspected pediatric appendicitis: case interpretation.

Authors:  Michael M Moore; James M Brian; Sosamma T Methratta; Michael A Hulse; Arabinda K Choudhary; Kathleen D Eggli; Danielle K B Boal
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-01-18

Review 4.  Noncontrast MRI of acute abdominal pain caused by gastrointestinal lesions: indications, protocol, and image interpretation.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Akira Furukawa; Kai Takaki; Yugo Imai; Shinichi Ota; Norihisa Nitta; Yoshiyuki Watanabe
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  [Acute abdomen - a practical approach].

Authors:  C Kulinna-Cosentini; S Röhrich; M A Arnoldner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Allergic Interstitial Nephritis Manifesting as a Striated Nephrogram.

Authors:  Irfan Moinuddin; Erika Bracamonte; Bijin Thajudeen; Amy Sussman; Machaiah Madhrira; James Costello
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2015-11-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.