Literature DB >> 23479251

Broad clinical utilization of NOTES: is it safe?

Santiago Horgan1, Ozanan R Meireles, Garth R Jacobsen, Bryan J Sandler, Alberto Ferreres, Sonia Ramamoorthy, Thomas Savides, Toshio Katagiri, Takayuki Dotai, Michael Sedrak, Saniea F Majid, Sheetal Nijhawan, Mark A Talamini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has been the focus of several studies as a less invasive alternative to conventional laparoscopy to access and treat intracavitary organs. For the last 5 years, much has been accomplished with animal studies, yet the clinical utilization of this novel technique is still modest. After 2 years of experience in the laboratory, we started our clinical experience. We report our experience with clinical utilization of NOTES procedures from 2007 to 2010.
METHODS: Under UCSD institutional review board-approved trials, 104 patients were enrolled under seven different NOTES protocols from 2007 to 2010, where a NOTES procedure was offered as an alternative to conventional treatments. The treated pathologies were cholelithiasis, biliary dyskinesia, acute and chronic appendicitis, ventral hernias, morbid obesity, and achalasia. The access routes included transgastric (TG), transvaginal (TV), transesophageal (TE), and perirectal (PR).
RESULTS: Among the 104 patients enrolled, 103 underwent a surgical procedure starting with diagnostic laparoscopy, and 94 cases were deemed appropriate to proceed via a NOTES approach. There were 9 aborted NOTES procedures at the time of the initial peritoneoscopy before creating a NOTES access route. The reasons to not proceed with a NOTES procedure in the TV cholecystectomy group (n = 5) were a large amount of pelvic adhesions in 4 patients and a severe inflammation of the gallbladder in 1 patient. In the TG cholecystectomy group (n = 1), it was severe inflammation of the gallbladder. In the TG appendectomy group (n = 1), it was the presence of localized peritonitis. In the TE endoscopic myotomy group (n = 2), it was the presence of megaesophagus with an inability to clean the esophagus of food debris. The NOTES procedures performed were 48 TV cholecystectomies, 4 TV appendectomies, 8 TG cholecystectomies, 2 PR peritoneoscopies, 3 TG appendectomies, 3 TV ventral hernia repairs, 5 TE endoscopic myotomies, 3 TV sleeve gastrectomies, and 18 TG sleeve gastrectomies. The average body mass indexes for those in the sleeve gastrectomy group was 42.1 kg/m(2) (TG route) and 40.6 kg/m(2) (TV route). There were no intraoperative complication and no conversions to standard laparoscopy during these procedures. The average hospital stay was 1-2 days. One patient who underwent TV cholecystectomy required an emergency department visit for nausea and vomiting. To date, 3 patients who underwent TV cholecystectomy have become pregnant and delivered normally.
CONCLUSIONS: NOTES is safe, feasible, and reproducible with previous training in the laboratory and a consistent team at a high-volume center. Prospective randomized studies of a large patient population are necessary to assess long-term results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23479251     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2736-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity.

Authors:  Anthony N Kalloo; Vikesh K Singh; Sanjay B Jagannath; Hideaki Niiyama; Susan L Hill; Cheryl A Vaughn; Carolyn A Magee; Sergey V Kantsevoy
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: a hybrid approach to natural orifice surgery.

Authors:  Marc Bessler; Peter D Stevens; Luca Milone; Manish Parikh; Dennis Fowler
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  NOTES: the hybrid technique.

Authors:  Yoav Mintz; Santiago Horgan; John Cullen; Sonia Ramamoorthy; Alana Chock; Michelle K Savu; David W Easter; Mark A Talamini
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 4.  NOTES: a review of the technical problems encountered and their solutions.

Authors:  Yoav Mintz; Santiago Horgan; John Cullen; David Stuart; Eric Falor; Mark A Talamini
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.878

5.  Comparison of intraabdominal pressures using the gastroscope and laparoscope for transgastric surgery.

Authors:  O Meireles; S V Kantsevoy; A N Kalloo; S B Jagannath; S A Giday; P Magno; S P Shih; E J Hanly; C-W Ko; D M Beitler; M R Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model.

Authors:  Sanjay B Jagannath; Sergey V Kantsevoy; Cheryl A Vaughn; Sydney S C Chung; Peter B Cotton; Christopher J Gostout; Robert H Hawes; Pankaj J Pasricha; Diana G Scorpio; Carolyn A Magee; Laurie J Pipitone; Anthony N Kalloo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application.

Authors:  R Zorron; L C Maggioni; L Pombo; A L Oliveira; G L Carvalho; M Filgueiras
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Thoracoscopic esophagomyotomy. Initial experience with a new approach for the treatment of achalasia.

Authors:  C Pellegrini; L A Wetter; M Patti; R Leichter; G Mussan; T Mori; G Bernstein; L Way
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: feasibility results in 68 cases with mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  C Zornig; H Mofid; L Siemssen; A Emmermann; M Alm; H-A von Waldenfels; C Felixmüller
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Initial experience with transvaginal incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  G R Jacobsen; K Thompson; A Spivack; L Fischer; B Wong; J Cullen; J Bosia; E Whitcomb; E Lucas; M Talamini; S Horgan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 4.739

View more
  6 in total

1.  Achieving the "Minimal Scarring" Concept in Bariatrics by Port-Site Relocation.

Authors:  Hadar Spivak; Lior Segev; Chanan Meydan; Rachel Yosef; Itai Ronen; Lior Heller
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Nereo Vettoretto; Gianfranco Silecchia; Carlo Bergamini; Pietro Maida; Pietro Lombari; Piero Narilli; Domenico Marchi; Alessandro Carrara; Maria Grazia Esposito; Stefania Fiume; Giuseppe Miranda; Simona Barlera; Marina Davoli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Transvaginal Hybrid NOTES Cholecystectomy: A Single-Centre Long-Term Experience on Sexual Function.

Authors:  U Pohlen; A Feller; C Holmer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES appendectomy in routine clinical use: prospective analysis of 13 cases and description of the procedure.

Authors:  Jurgen Knuth; Markus Maria Heiss; Dirk Rolf Bulian
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Transvaginal organ extraction: potential for broad clinical application.

Authors:  Garth R Jacobsen; Juan S Barajas-Gamboa; Alisa M Coker; Joslin Cheverie; C Aitor Macias; Bryan J Sandler; Mark A Talamini; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Transvaginal appendectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Yagci; Cuneyt Kayaalp
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2014-12-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.