OBJECTIVES: Ertapenem resistance is increasing in Enterobacteriaceae. The production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and reduced expression of outer membrane porins are major mechanisms of resistance in ertapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Less is known of ertapenem resistance in Escherichia coli. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of ESBL production in E. coli on the antibacterial activity of ertapenem. METHODS: Two E. coli strains, with and without ESBL production, were exposed to ertapenem in vitro for 48 h at concentrations simulating human pharmacokinetics with conventional and higher dosages. RESULTS: Isolates with non-susceptibility to ertapenem (MICs 0.75-1.5 mg/L) were detected after five of nine time-kill experiments with the ESBL-producing strain. All of these isolates had ompR mutations, which reduce the expression of outer membrane porins OmpF and OmpC. Higher dosage did not prevent selection of porin-deficient subpopulations. No mutants were detected after experiments with the non-ESBL-producing strain. Compared with other experiments, experiments with ompR mutants detected in endpoint samples showed significantly less bacterial killing after the second dose of ertapenem. Impaired antibacterial activity against E. coli with ESBL production and ompR mutation was also demonstrated in time-kill experiments with static antibiotic concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ESBL production and porin loss in E. coli can result in reduced susceptibility to ertapenem. Porin-deficient subpopulations frequently emerged in ESBL-producing E. coli during exposure to ertapenem at concentrations simulating human pharmacokinetics. Inappropriate use of ertapenem should be avoided to minimize the risk of selection of ESBL-producing bacteria with reduced susceptibility to carbapenems.
OBJECTIVES:Ertapenem resistance is increasing in Enterobacteriaceae. The production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and reduced expression of outer membrane porins are major mechanisms of resistance in ertapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Less is known of ertapenem resistance in Escherichia coli. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of ESBL production in E. coli on the antibacterial activity of ertapenem. METHODS: Two E. coli strains, with and without ESBL production, were exposed to ertapenem in vitro for 48 h at concentrations simulating human pharmacokinetics with conventional and higher dosages. RESULTS: Isolates with non-susceptibility to ertapenem (MICs 0.75-1.5 mg/L) were detected after five of nine time-kill experiments with the ESBL-producing strain. All of these isolates had ompR mutations, which reduce the expression of outer membrane porins OmpF and OmpC. Higher dosage did not prevent selection of porin-deficient subpopulations. No mutants were detected after experiments with the non-ESBL-producing strain. Compared with other experiments, experiments with ompR mutants detected in endpoint samples showed significantly less bacterial killing after the second dose of ertapenem. Impaired antibacterial activity against E. coli with ESBL production and ompR mutation was also demonstrated in time-kill experiments with static antibiotic concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ESBL production and porin loss in E. coli can result in reduced susceptibility to ertapenem. Porin-deficient subpopulations frequently emerged in ESBL-producing E. coli during exposure to ertapenem at concentrations simulating human pharmacokinetics. Inappropriate use of ertapenem should be avoided to minimize the risk of selection of ESBL-producing bacteria with reduced susceptibility to carbapenems.
Authors: Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Robert A Bonomo; Yehuda Carmeli; David L Paterson; Benito Almirante; Luis Martínez-Martínez; Antonio Oliver; Esther Calbo; Carmen Peña; Murat Akova; Johann Pitout; Julia Origüen; Vicente Pintado; Elisa García-Vázquez; Oriol Gasch; Axel Hamprecht; Nuria Prim; Mario Tumbarello; German Bou; Pierluigi Viale; Evelina Tacconelli; Manel Almela; Federico Pérez; Helen Giamarellou; José Miguel Cisneros; Mitchell J Schwaber; Mario Venditti; Warren Lowman; Joaquín Bermejo; Po-Ren Hsueh; Marta Mora-Rillo; Irene Gracia-Ahulfinger; Alvaro Pascual; Jesús Rodríguez-Baño Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Jessica M A Blair; Mark A Webber; Alison J Baylay; David O Ogbolu; Laura J V Piddock Journal: Nat Rev Microbiol Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 60.633
Authors: William C Shropshire; Samuel L Aitken; Reed Pifer; Jiwoong Kim; Micah M Bhatti; Xiqi Li; Awdhesh Kalia; Jessica Galloway-Peña; Pranoti Sahasrabhojane; Cesar A Arias; David E Greenberg; Blake M Hanson; Samuel A Shelburne Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 5.790