Literature DB >> 23478608

Prognosis factors for recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer preoperatively treated with chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Jorge Arredondo1, Jorge Baixauli, Carmen Beorlegui, Leire Arbea, Javier Rodríguez, Jesús Javier Sola, Ana Chopitea, José Luís Hernández-Lizoáin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision has improved the outcome of locally advanced rectal carcinoma.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify independent prognosis factors of disease recurrence in a group of patients treated with this approach. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: This study was retrospective in design. Data from patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who had completed treatment from 2000 to 2010 were reviewed. SETTINGS: The analysis was performed in a tertiary referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the recurrence risk factors.
RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 228 patients; 69.3% of them were men, and median age was 59 years. Stage III rectal cancer was found in 64.9% of patients. The most frequently administered therapy was concurrent capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and 7-field radiotherapy, followed by 3-field radiotherapy and fluoropyrimidines. After a median follow-up of 49 months, 23.7% of the patients experienced disease recurrence: 2.6% had local recurrence, 21.1% had distant metastases, and 0.5% had both. Factors significantly correlated with recurrence risk in multivariate logistic regression were y-pathological stage (III vs I/II: OR = 2.51), tumor regression grade (1/2 vs 3+/4: OR = 3.34; 3 vs 3+/4: OR = 1.20), and low rectal location (OR = 2.36). The only independent prognosis factor for liver metastases was tumor regression grade (1/2 vs 3+/4: OR = 4.67; 3 vs 3+/4: OR = 1.41), whereas tumor regression grade (1-2 vs 3+/4: OR = 5.5; 3 vs 3+/4: OR = 1.84), low rectal location (OR = 3.23), and previous liver metastasis (OR = 7.73) predicted lung recurrence. LIMITATIONS: This is a single institutional experience, neoadjuvant combined therapy is not homogeneous, and the analysis has been performed in a retrospective manner.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low third locally advanced rectal cancer with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (high y-pathological stage or low tumor regression grade) are at high risk of recurrence. Intense surveillance and the design of alternative therapeutic approaches aimed to lower the distant failure rate seem warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23478608     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318274d9c6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

Review 1.  Late-Onset Lung Metastasis in Rectum Cancer Can Be Confused with Primary Lung Cancer; a Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Y Bozkaya; I Albayrak; D Tucer; Z Kaya; U Usta
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2019-12

2.  Clinical significance of cellular and acellular mucin pools in rectal carcinoma following preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  J A Cienfuegos; J Baixauli; F Rotellar; J Arredondo; J J Sola; L Arbea; C Pastor; J L Hernández-Lizoáin
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Outcomes of rectal cancer with liver oligometastases.

Authors:  Lucas Resende Salgado; Howard Hsu; Kevin Du
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-12

4.  Feasibility of mesorectal vascular invasion in predicting early distant metastasis in patients with stage T3 rectal cancer based on rectal MRI.

Authors:  Young Chul Kim; Jai Keun Kim; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jei Hee Lee; Young Bae Kim; Sung Jae Shin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The impact of pathologic nodal status on survival following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan M Hernandez; Whalen Clark; Jill Weber; William J Fulp; Lauren Lange; David Shibata
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Patterns and management of distant failure in locally advanced rectal cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  J Arredondo; J Baixauli; J Rodríguez; C Beorlegui; L Arbea; G Zozaya; W Torre; J A -Cienfuegos; J L Hernández-Lizoáin
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  The Influence of the Distal Resection Margin Length on Local Recurrence and long- term Survival in Patients with Rectal Cancer after Chemoradiotherapy and Sphincter- Preserving Rectal Resection.

Authors:  Jan Grosek; Vaneja Velenik; Ibrahim Edhemovic; Mirko Omejc
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Characteristics of Patients Presented With Metastases During or After Completion of Chemoradiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Case Series.

Authors:  Radwan Torky; Mohammed Alessa; Ho Seung Kim; Ahmed Sakr; Eman Zakarneh; Fozan Sauri; Heejin Bae; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2020-09-18

9.  Prognostic value of mandard and dworak tumor regression grading in rectal cancer: study of a single tertiary center.

Authors:  Marisa D Santos; Cristina Silva; Anabela Rocha; Eduarda Matos; Carlos Nogueira; Carlos Lopes
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2014-03-04

10.  Pulmonary metastasis in rectal cancer: a retrospective study of clinicopathological characteristics of 404 patients in Chinese cohort.

Authors:  Hong-Da Pan; Gang Zhao; Qi An; Gang Xiao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.