Literature DB >> 23478548

A risk model to predict 90-day mortality among patients undergoing hepatic resection.

Omar Hyder1, Carlo Pulitano, Amin Firoozmand, Rebecca Dodson, Christopher L Wolfgang, Michael A Choti, Luca Aldrighetti, Timothy M Pawlik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reliable criteria to predict mortality after hepatectomy remain poorly defined. We sought to identify factors associated with 90-day mortality, as well as validate the "50-50" and peak bilirubin of >7 mg/dL prediction rules for mortality after liver resection. In addition, we propose a novel integer-based score for 90-day mortality using a large cohort of patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Data from 2,056 patients who underwent liver resection at 2 major hepatobiliary centers between 1990 and 2011 were identified. Perioperative laboratory data, as well as surgical and postoperative details, were analyzed to identify factors associated with liver-related 90-day death.
RESULTS: Indications for liver resection included colorectal metastasis (39%), hepatocellular carcinoma (19%), benign mass (17%), or noncolorectal metastasis (14%). Most patients had normal underlying liver parenchyma (71%) and resection involved ≥3 segments (36%). Overall morbidity and mortality were 19% and 2%, respectively. Only 1 patient fulfilled the 50-50 criteria; this patient survived and was discharged on day 8. Twenty patients had a peak bilirubin concentration >7 mg/dL and 5 died within 90 days; the sensitivity and specificity of the >7-mg/dL rule were 25% and 99.3%, respectively, but overall accuracy was poor (area under the curve 0.574). Factors associated with 90-day mortality included international normalized ratio (odds ratio = 11.87), bilirubin (odds ratio = 1.16), and serum creatinine (odds ratio = 1.87) on postoperative day 3, as well as grade of postoperative complications (odds ratio = 5.08; all p < 0.05). Integer values were assigned to each factor to develop a model that predicted 90-day mortality (area under the curve 0.89). A score of ≥11 points had a sensitivity and specificity of 83.3% and 98.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The 50-50 and bilirubin >7-mg/dL rules were not accurate in predicting 90-day mortality. Rather, a composite integer-based risk score based on postoperative day 3 international normalized ratio, bilirubin, creatinine, and complication grade more accurately predicted 90-day mortality after hepatectomy.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23478548      PMCID: PMC3985272          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  25 in total

1.  Postoperative liver function after elective right hepatectomy in elderly patients.

Authors:  G M Ettorre; D Sommacale; O Farges; A Sauvanet; O Guevara; J Belghiti
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Risk factors for perioperative morbidity and mortality after extended hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  A C Wei; R Tung-Ping Poon; S-T Fan; J Wong
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.

Authors:  M Malinchoc; P S Kamath; F D Gordon; C J Peine; J Rank; P C ter Borg
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS).

Authors:  Nuh N Rahbari; O James Garden; Robert Padbury; Mark Brooke-Smith; Michael Crawford; Rene Adam; Moritz Koch; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Ronald P Dematteo; Christopher Christophi; Simon Banting; Val Usatoff; Masato Nagino; Guy Maddern; Thomas J Hugh; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Paul Greig; Myrddin Rees; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Sheung Tat Fan; Yuji Nimura; Joan Figueras; Lorenzo Capussotti; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: results from 150 consecutive patients.

Authors:  N Nagasue; H Yukaya
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Is extended hepatectomy for hepatobiliary malignancy justified?

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Timothy M Pawlik; Eddie K Abdalla; James F Arens; Rabih A Nemr; Steven H Wei; Debra L Kennamer; Lee M Ellis; Steven A Curley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database.

Authors:  Ronnie T Poon; Sheung Tat Fan; Chung Mau Lo; Chi Leung Liu; Chi Ming Lam; Wai Key Yuen; Chun Yeung; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Major hepatic resection. A 25-year experience.

Authors:  H H Thompson; R K Tompkins; W P Longmire
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade.

Authors:  William R Jarnagin; Mithat Gonen; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; Leah Ben-Porat; Sarah Little; Carlos Corvera; Sharon Weber; Leslie H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  24 in total

1.  Bile duct surgery in the treatment of hepatobiliary and gallbladder malignancies: effects of hepatic and vascular resection on outcomes.

Authors:  Perry Shen; Nora Fino; Edward A Levine; Pamela Eversole; Clancy Clark
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Is intraoperative ultrasound still useful for the detection of colorectal cancer liver metastases?

Authors:  Guillaume Hoch; Valérie Croise-Laurent; Adeline Germain; Laurent Brunaud; Laurent Bresler; Ahmet Ayav
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Elevated Lactate is Independently Associated with Adverse Outcomes Following Hepatectomy.

Authors:  Madeline Lemke; Paul J Karanicolas; Rogeh Habashi; Ramy Behman; Natalie G Coburn; Sherif S Hanna; Calvin H L Law; Julie Hallet
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Defining Post Hepatectomy Liver Insufficiency: Where do We stand?

Authors:  Kelly Lafaro; Stefan Buettner; Hadia Maqsood; Doris Wagner; Fabio Bagante; Gaya Spolverato; Li Xu; Ihab Kamel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Adaptive growth changes in the liver remnant are affected by the size of hepatectomy in rats.

Authors:  Michelle Meier; Kasper Jarlhelt Andersen; Anders Riegels Knudsen; Jens Randel Nyengaard; Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit; Frank Viborg Mortensen
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Major hepatic resection: from volumetry to liver scintigraphy.

Authors:  François-René Pruvot; Stéphanie Truant
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Comparison of Adverse Events and Outcomes Between Patients With and Without Drain Insertion After Hepatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched, Multicenter, Prospective Observational Cohort Study in Japan (CSGO-HBP-001).

Authors:  Terumasa Yamada; Kunihito Gotoh; Shigeru Marubashi; Tadafumi Asaoka; Atsushi Miyamoto; Shogo Kobayashi; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Junzo Shimizu; Yongkook Kim; Masanori Tsujie; Takehiro Noda; Shigekazu Yokoyama; Yutaka Takeda; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki; Hiroaki Nagano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Defining incidence and risk factors of venous thromboemolism after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Donald L Lucas; Brandyn Lau; Matthew Weiss; Fabian M Johnston; Marin Kheng; Marian Kheng; Kenzo Hirose; Christopher L Wolfgang; Elliott Haut; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Prognostic Implications of Lymph Node Status for Patients With Gallbladder Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Neda Amini; Yuhree Kim; Ana Wilson; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Cecilia G Ethun; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Liver surgery in cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Authors:  Christina Hackl; Hans J Schlitt; Philipp Renner; Sven A Lang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.