Literature DB >> 23478499

Predicting high-risk disease using tissue biomarkers.

Michael J Donovan1, Carlos Cordon-Cardo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: For men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer, there are limited tools to understand the risk of disease progression and guide the treatment decision process. We will provide an overview of current prostate cancer biomarker discovery and validation strategies that are geared toward identifying aggressive, clinically significant disease at the time of diagnosis. RECENT
FINDINGS: The prostate gland exhibits multiple genetic events leading to both latent and clinically significant prostate cancer. Recent evidence from clinical translational studies has implicated the role of aneuploidy and copy-number variation as significant predictors of aggressive disease. Furthermore, the regulation of NKX3.1 by Pim-1 has provided a novel mechanism for the balance between indolence and disease course. Although promising, there are no routine clinically used tissue-based biomarkers for identifying risk of prostate cancer progression at diagnosis. The TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion has provided insight into the early development of prostate cancer but has not been unequivocally associated with aggressive disease. Importantly, the only platform relying on intact tissue profiles is the systems pathology analysis program that includes histomorphometry and quantitative multiplex biomarker assessment (including the evaluation of the prostate cancer stem cell) to construct prognostic algorithms for pretreatment and post-treatment assessment.
SUMMARY: Our objective for this review was to explore the effective use of prostate tissue samples, including fluids, to identify relevant markers of clinically significant disease. We believe that the inherent molecular heterogeneity in prostate cancer requires a multimodal approach, in the context of a systems pathology platform, to create the personalized tools for future diagnostic treatment algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23478499     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835f89cc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  9 in total

1.  [Personalized urooncology based on molecular uropathology: part 1: what is diagnostic routine?].

Authors:  C G Stöhr; R Stöhr; A Rogler; K Amann; R Knüchel-Clarke; A Hartmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  A CD24-p53 axis contributes to African American prostate cancer disparities.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Yue Zhang; Shi Wei; Sejong Bae; Wei-Hsiung Yang; Gary J Smith; James L Mohler; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Jeannette T Bensen; Guru P Sonpavde; Guo-Yun Chen; Runhua Liu; Lizhong Wang
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 3.  High-risk prostate cancer-classification and therapy.

Authors:  Albert J Chang; Karen A Autio; Mack Roach; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Male Oncology Research and Education program for men at high risk for prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Lorentz; S K Liu; D Vesprini
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  PRL‑3 increases the aggressive phenotype of prostate cancer cells in vitro and its expression correlates with high-grade prostate tumors in patients.

Authors:  Donna R Edwards; Krzysztof Moroz; Haitao Zhang; David Mulholland; Asim B Abdel-Mageed; Debasis Mondal
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 5.650

6.  Expression of ERG Protein and TMRPSS2-ERG Fusion in Prostatic Carcinoma in Egyptian Patients.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel-Hady; Ali El-Hindawi; Olfat Hammam; Heba Khalil; Sara Diab; Soulafa Abd El-Aziz; Mohamed Badawy; Ahmed Ismail; Noha Helmy; Nora Kamel; Shady Anis; Amr El Kholy; Khalid Al Osili; Afaf Abdel-Hady; Hani Nour; Maha Akl
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-20

Review 7.  Drug resistance and Cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Zhenning Wang; Jaffer A Ajani; Shumei Song
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.712

8.  A-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) and prostate-cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 4,385 participants.

Authors:  Ning Jiang; Shimiao Zhu; Jing Chen; Yuanjie Niu; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Mast cells as a potential prognostic marker in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Guido Giusti; Mauro Seveso; Rodolfo Hurle; Piergiuseppe Colombo; Sanja Stifter; Fabio Grizzi
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.434

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.