Literature DB >> 23478199

Ultrasound-guided surgery for palpable breast cancer is cost-saving: results of a cost-benefit analysis.

M H Haloua1, N M A Krekel, V M H Coupé, J E Bosmans, A M F Lopes Cardozo, S Meijer, M P van den Tol.   

Abstract

Ultrasound-guided surgery (USS) has recently been proven to result in a significant reduction of tumour-involved surgical margins, for patients with palpable invasive breast cancer. The objective of this economic evaluation alongside a randomised trial was to evaluate the costs and benefits of USS compared to palpation-guided surgery (PGS). The hospital perspective was used. On the cost side of the analysis, resource use related to baseline treatment was taken into account and on the benefit side, resource use related to additional treatments was included. On the cost side, the difference in costs per patient was €193 (95% CI €153-€233) with higher costs in the USS group. On the benefit side, the difference in costs per patient was -€349 (95% CI -€591 to -€103) with higher costs in the PGS group. This resulted in a cost decrease of -€154 (95% CI -€388 to €81) in the USS group compared to the PGS group. Intra-operative use of a US system during BCS reduces the rate of tumour-involved margins and thereby the costs of additional treatments.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23478199     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  9 in total

Review 1.  Tumour-adapted Reduction Mammoplasty - a New (Old) Breast Conserving Strategy: Review.

Authors:  M Eichbaum; A Dietrich; J Reinhard; R Steinwasser; C Eichbaum
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Intraoperative ultrasound for palpable breast cancer: the way forward?

Authors:  Amtul R Carmichael
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2013-05

Review 3.  Current status of ultrasound-guided surgery in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  José H Volders; Max H Haloua; Nicole Ma Krekel; Sybren Meijer; Petrousjka M van den Tol
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-10

4.  Reoperation costs in attempted breast-conserving surgery: a decision analysis.

Authors:  R E Pataky; C R Baliski
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Endoscopy-assisted breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Shinji Ozaki; Masahiro Ohara
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-05

6.  Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance in Breast-Conserving Surgery Improves Cosmetic Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (COBALT).

Authors:  Max H Haloua; José H Volders; Nicole M A Krekel; Alexander M F Lopes Cardozo; Wifred K de Roos; Louise M de Widt-Levert; Henk van der Veen; Herman Rijna; Elisabeth Bergers; Katarzyna Jóźwiak; Sybren Meijer; Petrousjka van den Tol
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Intraoperative ultrasound-guided lumpectomy versus wire-guided excision for nonpalpable breast cancer.

Authors:  Xin Hu; Si Li; Yi Jiang; Wei Wei; Yinan Ji; Qiuyun Li; Zongbin Jiang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Optimising patient care in medical radiation services through health economics: an introduction.

Authors:  Scott Jones; Amy Brown; Vanessa Barclay; Oona Reardon
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-02-04

9.  Implementation of Intraoperative Ultrasound Localization for Breast-Conserving Surgery in a Large, Integrated Health Care System is Feasible and Effective.

Authors:  Jeffery M Chakedis; Annie Tang; Gillian E Kuehner; Brooke Vuong; Liisa L Lyon; Lucinda A Romero; Benjamin M Raber; Melinda M Mortenson; Veronica C Shim; Nicole M Datrice-Hill; Jennifer R McEvoy; Vignesh A Arasu; Dorota J Wisner; Sharon B Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 5.344

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.