Literature DB >> 23478119

Predictors of bone metastasis in pre-treatment staging of asymptomatic treatment-naïve patients with prostate cancer.

M Moslehi1, M Cheki, M Salehi-Marzijarani, T Amuchastegui, A Gholamrezanezhad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no general consensus on the optimal criteria for the application of bone scintigraphy in screening of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer. Our study was conducted to assess the value of bone scan for pre-treatment staging of asymptomatic treatment-naïve patients with prostate cancer.
METHODS: A total of 203 consecutive asymptomatic and treatment-naïve patients with prostate cancer (age: 67.6±6.4 years) who were referred to our department for whole body bone scintigraphy were enrolled in the study. Three hours after intravenous injection of 20mCi (99m)Tc-MDP, all patients underwent whole body bone scanning using a single head gamma camera. The planar images were supplemented with SPECT as needed for questionable abnormalities or those having uncertain location on planar images.
RESULTS: The mean serum PSA levels, serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and Gleason score (GS) were 42.41±37.1ng/ml, 223.9±129.9IU/L and 6.7±1.1, respectively. A total of 55 cases (27.1%) out of 203 patients had bone metastases. The univariate analysis showed that serum PSA levels, GS and ALP were all significant predictors of bone metastases. However, only serum PSA and ALP levels were found to be independent predictors of bone metastasis in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The combination of PSA and ALP (in which patients with either elevated PSA [>20ng/ml] or elevated ALP were considered as positive) had the best screening value, with 98.2% sensitivity and 48.6% specificity.
CONCLUSION: Serum ALP screening can be employed as a tool to detect the subgroup of patients who are at high risk of bone metastases, while having a PSA of <20ng/ml. The combination of PSA and ALP can be used to improve predictability of bone metastasis in newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer, without affecting staging accuracy.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier España, S.L. and SEMNIM. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asintomático; Asymptomatic; Bone scintigraphy; Cáncer de próstata; Diagnostic value; Gammagrafía ósea; Prostate cancer; Valor diagnóstico

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23478119     DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2013.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol        ISSN: 2253-654X            Impact factor:   1.359


  4 in total

1.  Predicting bone scan positivity after biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in both hormone-naive men and patients receiving androgen-deprivation therapy: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  D M Moreira; M R Cooperberg; L E Howard; W J Aronson; C J Kane; M K Terris; C L Amling; M Kuchibhatla; S J Freedland
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  A simple prognostic model involving prostate-specific antigen, alkaline phosphatase and albumin for predicting the time required to progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer in patients who received androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Wei Lv; Hongxiang Shang; Xinqi Pei; Yule Chen; Hongjun Xie; Dalin He; Xinyang Wang; Lei Li
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  The risk factors of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Yang Zhou; Qing-Fu Yu; Ai-Fen Peng; Wei-Lai Tong; Jia-Ming Liu; Zhi-Li Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  When to perform positron emission tomography/computed tomography or radionuclide bone scan in patients with recently diagnosed prostate cancer.

Authors:  Carmelo Caldarella; Giorgio Treglia; Alessandro Giordano; Luca Giovanella
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.989

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.