Literature DB >> 23478096

Masked hypertension in diabetes mellitus: treatment implications for clinical practice.

Stanley S Franklin1, Lutgarde Thijs, Yan Li, Tine W Hansen, José Boggia, Yanping Liu, Kei Asayama, Kristina Björklund-Bodegård, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Jørgen Jeppesen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Eamon Dolan, Tatiana Kuznetsova, Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek, Valérie Tikhonoff, Sofia Malyutina, Edoardo Casiglia, Yuri Nikitin, Lars Lind, Edgardo Sandoya, Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz, Jan Filipovsky, Yutaka Imai, Jiguang Wang, Hans Ibsen, Eoin O'Brien, Jan A Staessen.   

Abstract

Although distinguishing features of masked hypertension in diabetics are well known, the significance of antihypertensive treatment on clinical practice decisions has not been fully explored. We analyzed 9691 subjects from the population-based 11-country International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes. Prevalence of masked hypertension in untreated normotensive participants was higher (P<0.0001) among 229 diabetics (29.3%, n=67) than among 5486 nondiabetics (18.8%, n=1031). Over a median of 11.0 years of follow-up, the adjusted risk for a composite cardiovascular end point in untreated diabetic-masked hypertensives tended to be higher than in normotensives (hazard rate [HR], 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-3.97; P=0.059), similar to untreated stage 1 hypertensives (HR, 1.07; CI, 0.58-1.98; P=0.82), but less than stage 2 hypertensives (HR, 0.53; CI, 0.29-0.99; P=0.048). In contrast, cardiovascular risk was not significantly different in antihypertensive-treated diabetic-masked hypertensives, as compared with the normotensive comparator group (HR, 1.13; CI, 0.54-2.35; P=0.75), stage 1 hypertensives (HR, 0.91; CI, 0.49-1.69; P=0.76), and stage 2 hypertensives (HR, 0.65; CI, 0.35-1.20; P=0.17). In the untreated diabetic-masked hypertensive population, mean conventional systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 129.2 ± 8.0/76.0 ± 7.3 mm Hg, and mean daytime systolic/diastolic blood pressure 141.5 ± 9.1/83.7 ± 6.5 mm Hg. In conclusion, masked hypertension occurred in 29% of untreated diabetics, had comparable cardiovascular risk as stage 1 hypertension, and would require considerable reduction in conventional blood pressure to reach daytime ambulatory treatment goal. Importantly, many hypertensive diabetics when receiving antihypertensive therapy can present with normalized conventional and elevated ambulatory blood pressure that mimics masked hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23478096      PMCID: PMC3631136          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  44 in total

1.  Office compared with ambulatory blood pressure in assessing response to antihypertensive treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Practice guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension for clinic, ambulatory and self blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Eoin O'Brien; Roland Asmar; Lawrie Beilin; Yutaka Imai; Giuseppe Mancia; Thomas Mengden; Martin Myers; Paul Padfield; Paolo Palatini; Gianfranco Parati; Thomas Pickering; Josep Redon; Jan Staessen; George Stergiou; Paolo Verdecchia
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure in men and women aged 17 to 80 years: the Allied Irish Bank Study.

Authors:  E O'Brien; J Murphy; A Tyndall; N Atkins; F Mee; G McCarthy; J Staessen; J Cox; K O'Malley
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Reproducibility of masked hypertension in adults with untreated borderline office blood pressure: comparison of ambulatory and home monitoring.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Alan L Hinderliter; Abhijit V Kshirsagar; Jason Fine; Rosalie Dominik
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Diurnal blood pressure pattern and risk of congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Erik Ingelsson; Kristina Björklund-Bodegård; Lars Lind; Johan Arnlöv; Johan Sundström
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Determinants of masked hypertension in the general population: the Finn-Home study.

Authors:  Marjo-Riitta A Hänninen; Teemu J Niiranen; Pauli J Puukka; Aino K Mattila; Antti M Jula
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Ambulatory blood pressure: normality and comparison with other measurements. Hypertension Working Group.

Authors:  C Schettini; M Bianchi; F Nieto; E Sandoya; H Senra
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Antihypertensive treatment based on blood pressure measurement at home or in the physician's office: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan A Staessen; Elly Den Hond; Hilde Celis; Robert Fagard; Louis Keary; Guy Vandenhoven; Eoin T O'Brien
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Benefits of tight blood pressure control in diabetic patients with hypertension: importance of early and sustained implementation of effective treatment strategies.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Grzegorz Bilo; Juan E Ochoa
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  54 in total

1.  Clinicopathologic features of breast cancer patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in southwest of China.

Authors:  Rui-Jue Wang; Lin-Jie Lu; Liang-Bin Jin; Hong-Yuan Li; Guo-Sheng Ren; Kai-Nan Wu; Sheng-Chun Liu; Ling-Quan Kong
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Waiting a few extra minutes before measuring blood pressure has potentially important clinical and research ramifications.

Authors:  S B Nikolic; W P Abhayaratna; R Leano; M Stowasser; J E Sharman
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Ambulatory blood pressure and arterial stiffness in individuals with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Raija Lithovius; Daniel Gordin; Carol Forsblom; Markku Saraheimo; Valma Harjutsalo; Per-Henrik Groop
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring phenotypes among individuals with and without diabetes taking antihypertensive medication: the Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  S G Bromfield; D Shimbo; A G Bertoni; M Sims; A P Carson; P Muntner
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 5.  Hypertension with diabetes mellitus: significance from an epidemiological perspective for Japanese.

Authors:  Yukako Tatsumi; Takayoshi Ohkubo
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.872

6.  Prognostic Value of Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension.

Authors:  Sante D Pierdomenico; Anna M Pierdomenico; Francesca Coccina; Denis L Clement; Marc L De Buyzere; Dirk A De Bacquer; Iddo Z Ben-Dov; Wanpen Vongpatanasin; José R Banegas; Luis M Ruilope; Lutgarde Thijs; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Out-of-Clinic Sympathetic Activity Is Increased in Patients With Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension.

Authors:  Mohammed Siddiqui; Eric K Judd; Byron C Jaeger; Hemal Bhatt; Tanja Dudenbostel; Bin Zhang; Lloyd J Edwards; Suzanne Oparil; David A Calhoun
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 8.  Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Have all risk factors the same strength?

Authors:  Iciar Martín-Timón; Cristina Sevillano-Collantes; Amparo Segura-Galindo; Francisco Javier Del Cañizo-Gómez
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2014-08-15

Review 9.  The complexity of masked hypertension: diagnostic and management challenges.

Authors:  Stanley S Franklin; Nathan D Wong
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 10.  Unmasking masked hypertension: prevalence, clinical implications, diagnosis, correlates and future directions.

Authors:  J Peacock; K M Diaz; A J Viera; J E Schwartz; D Shimbo
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.