Literature DB >> 23477697

Sound speeds vision through preparation, not integration.

Sander A Los1, Erik Van der Burg.   

Abstract

In manual choice reaction time (RT) tasks, people respond faster to a visual target stimulus when it is accompanied by a task-irrelevant tone than when it is presented alone. This intersensory facilitation effect is often attributed to multisensory integration, but here we show it to be a reflection of temporal preparation. According to this view, the more rapidly processed tone serves as a warning signal (S1), which initiates preparation for the more sluggish visual target (S2). To test this view, we varied the delay between S1 and S2 in conjunction with the modality of S1 (auditory or visual). For brief delays, responses to S2 were faster when S1 was auditory than when it was visual. Crucially, however, this intersensory facilitation effect disappeared after correction for the difference in S1-detection time, equating the effective preparation period. This shows that sound speeds response to a visual target only through preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23477697     DOI: 10.1037/a0032183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  15 in total

1.  Corticospinal modulation induced by sounds depends on action preparedness.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; James R Tresilian; Aymar de Rugy; Simranjit Sidhu; Stephan Riek
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Rapid recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; David Alais; John Cass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Rhythmicity and cross-modal temporal cues facilitate detection.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Charles E Schroeder; David Poeppel; Nienke van Atteveldt; Elana Zion-Golumbic
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Nonspecific competition underlies transient attention.

Authors:  Anna Wilschut; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-09-04

5.  Skill dependent audiovisual integration in the fusiform induces repetition suppression.

Authors:  Chris McNorgan; James R Booth
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 6.  The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Vincenzo Romei; Nienke van Atteveldt; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Micah M Murray; Pawel J Matusz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Rapid, generalized adaptation to asynchronous audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Patrick T Goodbourn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Exploring the effectiveness of auditory, visual, and audio-visual sensory cues in a multiple object tracking environment.

Authors:  Julia Föcker; Polly Atkins; Foivos-Christos Vantzos; Maximilian Wilhelm; Thomas Schenk; Hauke S Meyerhoff
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.157

9.  Role of audiovisual synchrony in driving head orienting responses.

Authors:  Cristy Ho; Rob Gray; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Audiovisual temporal recalibration occurs independently at two different time scales.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; David Alais; John Cass
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.