Literature DB >> 23477625

Nonemergency PCI at hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery.

Alice K Jacobs1, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Joseph M Massaro, Donald E Cutlip, Joseph P Carrozza, Anthony D Marks, Nancy Murphy, Iyah K Romm, Madeleine Biondolillo, Laura Mauri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency surgery has become a rare event after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether having cardiac-surgery services available on-site is essential for ensuring the best possible outcomes during and after PCI remains uncertain.
METHODS: We enrolled patients with indications for nonemergency PCI who presented at hospitals in Massachusetts without on-site cardiac surgery and randomly assigned these patients, in a 3:1 ratio, to undergo PCI at that hospital or at a partner hospital that had cardiac surgery services available. A total of 10 hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery and 7 with on-site cardiac surgery participated. The coprimary end points were the rates of major adverse cardiac events--a composite of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, or stroke--at 30 days (safety end point) and at 12 months (effectiveness end point). The primary end points were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle and were tested with the use of multiplicative noninferiority margins of 1.5 (for safety) and 1.3 (for effectiveness).
RESULTS: A total of 3691 patients were randomly assigned to undergo PCI at a hospital without on-site cardiac surgery (2774 patients) or at a hospital with on-site cardiac surgery (917 patients). The rates of major adverse cardiac events were 9.5% in hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery and 9.4% in hospitals with on-site cardiac surgery at 30 days (relative risk, 1.00; 95% one-sided upper confidence limit, 1.22; P<0.001 for noninferiority) and 17.3% and 17.8%, respectively, at 12 months (relative risk, 0.98; 95% one-sided upper confidence limit, 1.13; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The rates of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke (the components of the primary end point) did not differ significantly between the groups at either time point.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonemergency PCI procedures performed at hospitals in Massachusetts without on-site surgical services were noninferior to procedures performed at hospitals with on-site surgical services with respect to the 30-day and 1-year rates of clinical events. (Funded by the participating hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery; MASS COM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01116882.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23477625     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  13 in total

1.  Interventional cardiology. Nonprimary PCI at centres without onsite surgical backup.

Authors:  Hiroki Shiomi; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Austrian National CathLab Registry (ANCALAR): cardiac catheterization, coronary angiography (CA), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Austria during the year 2011 (Registry Data with Audit including 2012).

Authors:  Volker Mühlberger; Conrad Kobel; Lalit Kaltenbach; Otmar Pachinger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 3.  Use of Mortality as an Endpoint in Noninferiority Trials May Lead to Ethically Problematic Conclusions.

Authors:  Andrew M Hersh; Robert J Walter; Scott K Abberegg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Interventional cardiology. PCI without surgical backup--evidence-based, but wise?

Authors:  Thomas M Maddox; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Relationship Between Procedural Volume and Outcomes.

Authors:  Apurva O Badheka; Sidakpal S Panaich; Shilpkumar Arora; Nilay Patel; Nileshkumar J Patel; Chirag Savani; Abhishek Deshmukh; Mauricio G Cohen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease - A Single Hospital Experience without On-Site Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Hsiao-Yang Cheng; Kuang-Te Wang; Wen-Hsiung Lin; Jui-Peng Tsai; Yung-Tzi Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 7.  The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research.

Authors:  Panteha Hayati Rezvan; Katherine J Lee; Julie A Simpson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 8.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in the UK: recommendations for good practice 2015.

Authors:  Adrian P Banning; Andreas Baumbach; Dan Blackman; Nick Curzen; Sen Devadathan; Douglas Fraser; Peter Ludman; Micheal Norell; Dougie Muir; James Nolan; Simon Redwood
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Predicting emergency coronary artery bypass graft following PCI: application of a computational model to refer patients to hospitals with and without onsite surgical backup.

Authors:  Zeeshan Syed; Mauro Moscucci; David Share; Hitinder S Gurm
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-12-01

10.  Percutaneous coronary intervention without surgery on-site is here to stay.

Authors:  R J de Winter
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.