Fiona Crichton1, George Dodd2, Gian Schmid2, Greg Gamble3, Keith J Petrie1. 1. Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland. 2. Acoustic Research Centre, University of Auckland. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Auckland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The development of new wind farms in many parts of the world has been thwarted by public concern that subaudible sound (infrasound) generated by wind turbines causes adverse health effects. Although the scientific evidence does not support a direct pathophysiological link between infrasound and health complaints, there is a body of lay information suggesting a link between infrasound exposure and health effects. This study tested the potential for such information to create symptom expectations, thereby providing a possible pathway for symptom reporting. METHOD: A sham-controlled double-blind provocation study, in which participants were exposed to 10 min of infrasound and 10 min of sham infrasound, was conducted. Fifty-four participants were randomized to high- or low-expectancy groups and presented audiovisual information, integrating material from the Internet, designed to invoke either high or low expectations that exposure to infrasound causes specified symptoms. RESULTS: High-expectancy participants reported significant increases, from preexposure assessment, in the number and intensity of symptoms experienced during exposure to both infrasound and sham infrasound. There were no symptomatic changes in the low-expectancy group. CONCLUSIONS:Healthy volunteers, when given information about the expected physiological effect of infrasound, reported symptoms that aligned with that information, during exposure to both infrasound and sham infrasound. Symptom expectations were created by viewing information readily available on the Internet, indicating the potential for symptom expectations to be created outside of the laboratory, in real world settings. Results suggest psychological expectations could explain the link between wind turbine exposure and health complaints.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The development of new wind farms in many parts of the world has been thwarted by public concern that subaudible sound (infrasound) generated by wind turbines causes adverse health effects. Although the scientific evidence does not support a direct pathophysiological link between infrasound and health complaints, there is a body of lay information suggesting a link between infrasound exposure and health effects. This study tested the potential for such information to create symptom expectations, thereby providing a possible pathway for symptom reporting. METHOD: A sham-controlled double-blind provocation study, in which participants were exposed to 10 min of infrasound and 10 min of sham infrasound, was conducted. Fifty-four participants were randomized to high- or low-expectancy groups and presented audiovisual information, integrating material from the Internet, designed to invoke either high or low expectations that exposure to infrasound causes specified symptoms. RESULTS: High-expectancy participants reported significant increases, from preexposure assessment, in the number and intensity of symptoms experienced during exposure to both infrasound and sham infrasound. There were no symptomatic changes in the low-expectancy group. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy volunteers, when given information about the expected physiological effect of infrasound, reported symptoms that aligned with that information, during exposure to both infrasound and sham infrasound. Symptom expectations were created by viewing information readily available on the Internet, indicating the potential for symptom expectations to be created outside of the laboratory, in real world settings. Results suggest psychological expectations could explain the link between wind turbine exposure and health complaints.
Authors: Jarry T Porsius; Liesbeth Claassen; Tjabe Smid; Fred Woudenberg; Danielle R M Timmermans Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Loren D Knopper; Christopher A Ollson; Lindsay C McCallum; Melissa L Whitfield Aslund; Robert G Berger; Kathleen Souweine; Mary McDaniel Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2014-06-19
Authors: Lindsay C McCallum; Melissa L Whitfield Aslund; Loren D Knopper; Glenn M Ferguson; Christopher A Ollson Journal: Environ Health Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Robert G Berger; Payam Ashtiani; Christopher A Ollson; Melissa Whitfield Aslund; Lindsay C McCallum; Geoff Leventhall; Loren D Knopper Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2015-02-24