Literature DB >> 23476936

When bugs reveal biodiversity.

Kristine Bohmann1, Ida B Schnell, M Thomas P Gilbert.   

Abstract

One of the fundamental challenges of conservation biology is gathering data on species distribution and abundance. And unless conservationists know where a species is found and in which numbers, it is very difficult to apply effective conservation efforts. In today's age of increasingly powerful monitoring tools, instant communication and online databases, one might be forgiven for thinking that such knowledge is easy to come by. However, of the approximately 5,400 terrestrial mammals on the IUCN Red List, no fewer than 789 (ca. 14%) are listed as 'Data Deficient' (IUCN 2012) – IUCN’s term for 'haven't got a clue'. Until recently, the only way to gather information of numbers and distribution of terrestrial mammals (and many other vertebrates) was through observational-based approaches such as visual records, the presence of tracks or spoor or even identification from bushmeat or hunters' trophies pinned to the walls in local villages. While recent technological developments have considerably improved the efficacy of such approaches, for example, using remote-sensing devices such as audio- or camera-traps or even remote drones (Koh & Wich 2012), there has been a growing realization of the power of molecular methods that identify mammals based on trace evidence. Suitable substrates include the obvious, such as faecal and hair samples (e.g. Vigilant et al. 2009), to the less obvious, including environmental DNA extracted from sediments, soil or water samples (e.g. Taberlet et al. 2012), and as recently demonstrated, the dietary content of blood-sucking invertebrates (Gariepy et al. 2012; Schnell et al. 2012). In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Calvignac-Spencer et al. (2013) present a potentially powerful development in this regard; diet analysis of carrion flies. With their near global distribution, and as most field biologists know, irritatingly high frequency in most terrestrial areas of conservation concern (which directly translates into ease of sampling them), the authors present extremely encouraging results that indicate how carnivorous flies may soon represent a strong weapon in the conservation arsenal.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23476936     DOI: 10.1111/mec.12221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  6 in total

1.  High resistance towards herbivore-induced habitat change in a high Arctic arthropod community.

Authors:  Niels M Schmidt; Jesper B Mosbacher; Bernhard Eitzinger; Eero J Vesterinen; Tomas Roslin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Viral Metagenomics on Blood-Feeding Arthropods as a Tool for Human Disease Surveillance.

Authors:  Annika Brinkmann; Andreas Nitsche; Claudia Kohl
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Towards a more healthy conservation paradigm: integrating disease and molecular ecology to aid biological conservation.

Authors:  Pooja Gupta; V V Robin; Guha Dharmarajan
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Ideating iDNA: Lessons and limitations from leeches in legacy collections.

Authors:  Mark E Siddall; Megan Barkdull; Michael Tessler; Mercer R Brugler; Elizabeth Borda; Evon Hekkala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Beyond Biodiversity: Can Environmental DNA (eDNA) Cut It as a Population Genetics Tool?

Authors:  Clare I M Adams; Michael Knapp; Neil J Gemmell; Gert-Jan Jeunen; Michael Bunce; Miles D Lamare; Helen R Taylor
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Measuring protected-area effectiveness using vertebrate distributions from leech iDNA.

Authors:  Yinqiu Ji; Christopher C M Baker; Viorel D Popescu; Jiaxin Wang; Chunying Wu; Zhengyang Wang; Yuanheng Li; Lin Wang; Chaolang Hua; Zhongxing Yang; Chunyan Yang; Charles C Y Xu; Alex Diana; Qingzhong Wen; Naomi E Pierce; Douglas W Yu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 17.694

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.