| Literature DB >> 23476671 |
El Hadji Amadou Niang1, Aissatou Touré, El Hadji Malick Ngom, Lassana Konaté, Ousmane Faye, Mawlouth Diallo, Ibrahima Dia.
Abstract
Malaria transmission pattern was studied in 3 villages (Toubanding, Daga Ndoup, and Keur Samba Guèye) situated within an area selected for clinical trials. The study was conducted in the rainy season from July to December 2011. The main objective of this work was to gather baseline data on malaria transmission intensity and other entomological parameters before the advent of clinical trials. Mosquitoes were collected by Human-Landing Collections (HLCs) and by pyrethrum spray catches (PSCs). Five anopheline species were collected, namely, An. arabiensis, An. gambiae, An. funestus, An. pharoensis, and An. rufipes, giving a heterogeneous distribution within the study area. The populations dynamics of the vectors varied temporarily in each village depending on the pattern of the rainy season. Transmission intensity estimated by the entomological inoculation rate (EIR) was measured in each of the three villages with the variations linked to the microecological differences between the villages. Measurements were calculated for August, September, and October and were found to vary between 4 and 30 infected bites per person over the study period with a peak intensity observed in September. These results indicate that epidemiological field trials on malaria could be conducted in this area on the basis of the differences observed with transmission intensity, micro-ecological variations, and the objectives of the trials.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23476671 PMCID: PMC3576792 DOI: 10.1155/2013/907375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Trop Med ISSN: 1687-9686
Figure 1Map of the study area showing the three study villages.
Number of anopheline species collected by HLC and PSC in Daga Ndoup, Keur Samba Guèye, and Toubanding from July to December 2011.
| Mosquito species | Daga Ndoup | Keur Samba Guèye | Toubanding | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLC | PSC | HLC | PSC | HLC | PSC | Total | ||||
| In | Out | In | In | Out | In | In | Out | In | ||
|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 45 | 54 | 122 |
|
| 22 | 36 | 403 | 45 | 50 | 118 | 115 | 125 | 170 | 1084 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Total | 22 | 37 | 405 | 49 | 50 | 119 | 138 | 172 | 224 | 1216 |
Figure 2Temporal dynamics of An. gambiae, An. funestus, and An. pharoensis in Toubanding, Keur Samba Guèye and Daga Ndoup villages from July to December 2011.
Proportions of An. gambiae and An. funestus fed on each vertebrate host in Daga Ndoup, Keur Samba Guèye, and Toubanding among resting mosquitoes.
| Species | Villages | Number | Vertebrate hosts (%) | Mixed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| identified | Human | Bovine | Ovine | Equine | |||
| Daga Ndoup | 212 | 62.6 | 27.2 | 0 | 10.3 | 8 | |
|
| Keur Samba Guèye | 72 | 65.2 | 31.8 | 0 | 3 | 8.3 |
| Toubanding | 101 | 48.3 | 42.5 | 1.1 | 8 | 13.9 | |
|
| |||||||
| Daga Ndoup | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| Keur Samba Guèye | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Toubanding | 27 | 24 | 72 | 0 | 4 | 7.4 | |
[ ]: 95% confidence interval.
Parity rates of An. gambiae and An. funestus in Daga Ndoup, Keur Samba Guèye, and Toubanding during the six surveys.
| Species | Villages | Dissected | Parous | PR [95% CI] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daga Ndoup | 39 | 15 | 38.5 [24.9–54.1] | |
|
| Keur Samba Guèye | 51 | 36 | 70.6 [57–81.3] |
| Toubanding | 156 | 83 | 53.2 [45.4–60.9] | |
|
| ||||
| Daga Ndoup | — | — | — | |
|
| Keur Samba Guèye | — | — | — |
| Toubanding | 50 | 39 | 78 [64.8–87.2] | |
PR: parity rate in percentage.
[ ]: 95% confidence interval.
Mean infection rate calculated by ELISA for P. falciparum for An. gambiae, An. funestus, and An. pharoensis in Daga Ndoup, Keur Samba Guèye, and Toubanding.
| Villages | Species | HBR (b/p/n) | CSPR (%) | EIR (Ib/p/n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.02 | 0 | 0 | |
| Daga Ndoup |
| 1.21 | 1.72 (0.3–9.13) | 0.02 (0.004–0.11) |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| ||||
|
| 0.06 | 0 | 0 | |
| Keur Samba Guèye |
| 1.98 | 1.05 (0.19–5.72) | 0.02 (0.004–0.11) |
|
| 0.02 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| ||||
|
| 1.29 | 3.23 (0.89–11.03) | 0.04 (0.01–0.14) | |
| Toubanding |
| 5 | 2.50 (1.15–5.35) | 0.13 (0.006–0.27) |
|
| 0.17 | 0 | 0 | |
HBR: human-biting rate.
CSPR: circumsporozoite rate.
EIR: entomological inoculation rate.
Ib/p/n: infective bites per person per night.
( ): 95% confidence interval.