Literature DB >> 23476347

Poly[[tetra-aquadi-μ4-fumarato-μ2-oxalato-dierbium(III)] tetra-hydrate].

Qing-Feng Yang1, Xiao-Zhong Wang, Ping Xue.   

Abstract

The title compound, {[Er2(C4H2O4)2(C2O4)(H2O)4]·4H2O} n , was synthesized by the reaction of erbium nitrate hexa-hydrate with fumaric acid and oxalic acid under hydro-thermal conditions. The Er(3+) cation (site symmetry ..2) is eight-coordinated by six O atoms from four fumarate anions (site symmetry ..2) and one bidentate oxalate anion (site symmetry 222), and by two water mol-ecules. The complex exhibits a three-dimensional structure consisting of oxalate pillared Er-fumarate layers with channels occupied by coordinating and lattice water mol-ecules. The three-dimensional structure features by Owater-H⋯O hydrogen bonds involving both the coordinating and lattice water mol-ecules.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23476347      PMCID: PMC3588352          DOI: 10.1107/S160053681205026X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For lanthanidemetal complexes containing fumarate ligands, see: Zhang et al. (2006 ▶). For lanthanide-containing structures with metal-organic frameworks and two different flexible carboxyl­ate ligands, see: Zhang et al. (2008 ▶); Zhu et al. (2007 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Er2(C4H2O4)2(C2O4)(H2O)4]·4H2O M = 794.78 Orthorhombic, a = 9.6016 (19) Å b = 15.701 (3) Å c = 26.722 (5) Å V = 4028.5 (14) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 8.38 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.19 × 0.16 × 0.13 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001 ▶) T min = 0.305, T max = 0.402 9284 measured reflections 1162 independent reflections 1088 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.022

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.018 wR(F 2) = 0.045 S = 1.11 1162 reflections 74 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.51 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.04 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Click here for additional data file. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681205026X/hg5272sup1.cif Click here for additional data file. Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681205026X/hg5272Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Er2(C4H2O4)2(C2O4)(H2O)4]·4H2ODx = 2.621 Mg m3
Mr = 794.78Melting point: not measured K
Orthorhombic, FdddMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -F 2uv 2vwCell parameters from 9875 reflections
a = 9.6016 (19) Åθ = 3.0–27.5°
b = 15.701 (3) ŵ = 8.38 mm1
c = 26.722 (5) ÅT = 293 K
V = 4028.5 (14) Å3Block, pink
Z = 80.19 × 0.16 × 0.13 mm
F(000) = 3008
Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer1162 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1088 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.022
Detector resolution: 9.00cm pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.0°
ω scansh = −12→12
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)k = −20→20
Tmin = 0.305, Tmax = 0.402l = −34→31
9284 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.018Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.045H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0186P)2 + 60.2587P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1162 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.003
74 parametersΔρmax = 0.51 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −1.04 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.9358 (4)0.1660 (2)0.52974 (13)0.0167 (6)
C21.0906 (4)0.1604 (3)0.53278 (16)0.0268 (8)
H21.14070.21100.53480.032*
C30.62500.0756 (3)0.62500.0150 (8)
Er10.62500.12500.508677 (7)0.01528 (8)
O10.8868 (3)0.23742 (16)0.51740 (10)0.0237 (5)
O20.8597 (3)0.10210 (16)0.53731 (11)0.0239 (5)
O30.6164 (3)0.04009 (15)0.58332 (9)0.0190 (5)
O40.4757 (3)0.12267 (15)0.43533 (9)0.0256 (5)
H4A0.39850.14470.44400.031*
H4B0.45950.07060.42880.031*
O50.5533 (3)0.20049 (15)0.34370 (9)0.0859 (16)
H5A0.52980.17690.37110.103*
H5B0.56610.25340.34850.129*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0141 (15)0.0186 (16)0.0173 (16)0.0032 (13)−0.0010 (13)0.0001 (13)
C20.0159 (17)0.0232 (18)0.041 (2)−0.0021 (14)0.0015 (15)−0.0025 (17)
C30.0133 (19)0.013 (2)0.019 (2)0.000−0.0012 (19)0.000
Er10.01765 (12)0.01422 (11)0.01396 (11)0.00560 (8)0.0000.000
O10.0239 (13)0.0200 (12)0.0270 (13)0.0067 (10)0.0003 (11)0.0045 (10)
O20.0168 (12)0.0205 (12)0.0344 (14)0.0009 (10)0.0001 (11)0.0027 (11)
O30.0269 (13)0.0139 (11)0.0161 (11)−0.0003 (10)−0.0015 (10)−0.0010 (9)
O40.0296 (13)0.0215 (12)0.0256 (13)−0.0017 (11)−0.0040 (11)0.0002 (11)
O50.099 (4)0.076 (3)0.082 (3)−0.011 (3)0.012 (3)0.037 (3)
C1—O21.258 (4)Er1—O32.401 (2)
C1—O11.260 (4)Er1—O22.407 (3)
C1—C21.491 (5)Er1—O2iii2.407 (3)
C2—C2i1.294 (8)Er1—O42.428 (2)
C2—H20.9300Er1—O4iii2.428 (2)
C3—O31.249 (3)O1—Er1iv2.273 (3)
C3—O3ii1.249 (3)O4—H4A0.8500
C3—C3iii1.550 (9)O4—H4B0.8499
Er1—O1iv2.273 (3)O5—H5A0.8500
Er1—O1v2.273 (3)O5—H5B0.8500
Er1—O3iii2.401 (2)
O2—C1—O1122.4 (3)O3—Er1—O2iii77.67 (9)
O2—C1—C2121.5 (3)O2—Er1—O2iii142.93 (13)
O1—C1—C2116.0 (3)O1iv—Er1—O474.78 (9)
C2i—C2—C1124.0 (5)O1v—Er1—O476.55 (9)
C2i—C2—H2118.0O3iii—Er1—O4134.38 (9)
C1—C2—H2118.0O3—Er1—O4129.93 (8)
O3—C3—O3ii126.9 (4)O2—Er1—O4143.80 (9)
O3—C3—C3iii116.6 (2)O2iii—Er1—O472.91 (9)
O3ii—C3—C3iii116.6 (2)O1iv—Er1—O4iii76.55 (9)
O1iv—Er1—O1v144.28 (13)O1v—Er1—O4iii74.78 (9)
O1iv—Er1—O3iii74.25 (9)O3iii—Er1—O4iii129.93 (8)
O1v—Er1—O3iii141.35 (9)O3—Er1—O4iii134.38 (9)
O1iv—Er1—O3141.35 (9)O2—Er1—O4iii72.91 (9)
O1v—Er1—O374.25 (9)O2iii—Er1—O4iii143.80 (9)
O3iii—Er1—O367.62 (11)O4—Er1—O4iii72.38 (12)
O1iv—Er1—O2106.62 (9)C1—O1—Er1iv160.8 (3)
O1v—Er1—O284.78 (9)C1—O2—Er1111.9 (2)
O3iii—Er1—O277.67 (9)C3—O3—Er1119.4 (2)
O3—Er1—O271.66 (9)Er1—O4—H4A106.7
O1iv—Er1—O2iii84.78 (9)Er1—O4—H4B106.7
O1v—Er1—O2iii106.62 (9)H4A—O4—H4B106.7
O3iii—Er1—O2iii71.66 (9)H5A—O5—H5B109.5
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O4—H4A···O5vi0.852.353.045 (5)139
O4—H4B···O3vii0.851.912.750 (3)168
O5—H5A···O40.851.992.836180
O5—H5B···O2viii0.852.362.938 (4)125
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O4—H4A⋯O5i 0.852.353.045 (5)139
O4—H4B⋯O3ii 0.851.912.750 (3)168
O5—H5A⋯O40.851.992.836180
O5—H5B⋯O2iii 0.852.362.938 (4)125

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Two 3D porous lanthanide-fumarate-oxalate frameworks exhibiting framework dynamics and luminescent change upon reversible de- and rehydration.

Authors:  Wen-Hua Zhu; Zhe-Ming Wang; Song Gao
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2007-02-19       Impact factor: 5.165

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.