Literature DB >> 23475940

Predicting the ICECAP-O capability index from the WOMAC osteoarthritis index: is mapping onto capability from condition-specific health status questionnaires feasible?

Paul M Mitchell1, Tracy E Roberts1, Pelham M Barton1, Beth S Pollard2, Joanna Coast1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in the application of the capability approach in health economic analysis. The aim of the research reported here is to assess the feasibility of mapping from a condition-specific questionnaire (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities [WOMAC] Osteoarthritis Index) to a capability well-being questionnaire (ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people [ICECAP-O]).
METHODS: . One hundred five osteoarthritis patients requiring joint replacement completed the 5 attributes on the ICECAP-O (attachment, security, role, enjoyment, and control) and the 3 WOMAC categories (pain, stiffness, and physical function). The prediction data set consisted of baseline scores, whereas follow-up data were used to validate the predictions. The mapping algorithms used ordinary least squares and multinomial logistic regression models to predict the relationship between WOMAC scores, categories, or items and ICECAP-O scores or the 5 ICECAP-O attributes.
RESULTS: . ICECAP-O scores predicted from WOMAC category scores produced the lowest mapping error statistics (mean absolute error = 0.0832; mean squared error = 0.0142) as well as highest goodness of fit (R(2) = 0.3976). Prediction of ICECAP-O attributes from WOMAC category scores was possible for the majority of capability dimensions. The "control" attribute and physical function WOMAC category exhibited the strongest relationship (R(2) = 0.2143). The "attachment" attribute proved difficult to predict from any WOMAC category, which is in line with intuition given this attribute captures psychological well-being rather than pain, stiffness, or physical function.
CONCLUSION: . This is the first study to investigate the predictive ability of a condition-specific measure of health onto capability. The results presented here suggest it is feasible to map from condition-specific measures to an overall capability index, although WOMAC cannot predict individual capability in its entirety. Although the results here are encouraging for those interested in using ICECAP-O, given the small validation sample size applied, further research will be required to verify these findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICECAP-O; WOMAC; joint replacement; mapping; patient-reported outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23475940     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X12475092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  7 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of integrated care in frail elderly using the ICECAP-O and EQ-5D: does choice of instrument matter?

Authors:  Peter Makai; Willemijn Looman; Eddy Adang; René Melis; Elly Stolk; Isabelle Fabbricotti
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-04-24

2.  Quality of life of nursing home residents with dementia: validation of the German version of the ICECAP-O.

Authors:  Peter Makai; Franziska Beckebans; Job van Exel; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Applications of the Capability Approach in the Health Field: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Paul Mark Mitchell; Tracy E Roberts; Pelham M Barton; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Soc Indic Res       Date:  2016-05-10

4.  Predicting health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L) and capability wellbeing (ICECAP-A) in the context of opiate dependence using routine clinical outcome measures: CORE-OM, LDQ and TOP.

Authors:  Jasmine Peak; Ilias Goranitis; Ed Day; Alex Copello; Nick Freemantle; Emma Frew
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 5.  Capability instruments in economic evaluations of health-related interventions: a comparative review of the literature.

Authors:  Timea Mariann Helter; Joanna Coast; Agata Łaszewska; Tanja Stamm; Judit Simon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Modelling the relationship between the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index and EQ-5D.

Authors:  Allan Wailoo; Monica Hernandez Alava; Antonio Escobar Martinez
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Mapping to Quality of Life and Capability Measures in Cataract Surgery Patients: From Cat-PROM5 to EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and ICECAP-O Using Mixture Modelling.

Authors:  Padraig Dixon; William Hollingworth; John Sparrow
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2020-04-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.