PURPOSE: In this work, we investigate the spatial and temporal fidelity of highly constrained backPRojection (HYPR) processing using a computer-controlled motion phantom. The goal of this experimental set-up was to provide not only well-defined temporal dynamics and spatial characteristics of the motion phantom, but also circumstances that imitate in vivo scenarios. METHODS: The phantom was designed to represent an artery flanked on both sides by vein. Both arterial and venous components have different temporal dynamics but are confluent, which corresponds to a difficult scenario for HYPR. Spatial and temporal fidelity was investigated by measuring signal intensity profiles through the phantom both orthogonal to as well as along the direction of motion. RESULTS: Spatial fidelity profiles measured from the HYPR processed images yielded full-width-at-half-maximum values very similar to those measured in non-HYPR-processed images. Furthermore, there was no significant spreading of the motion phantom leading edge in HYPR processed images. CONCLUSION: Although HYPR processing has certain characteristic artifacts that are discussed, the technique can be used to improve image quality of highly undersampled time frame images with minimal loss of spatial or temporal fidelity.
PURPOSE: In this work, we investigate the spatial and temporal fidelity of highly constrained backPRojection (HYPR) processing using a computer-controlled motion phantom. The goal of this experimental set-up was to provide not only well-defined temporal dynamics and spatial characteristics of the motion phantom, but also circumstances that imitate in vivo scenarios. METHODS: The phantom was designed to represent an artery flanked on both sides by vein. Both arterial and venous components have different temporal dynamics but are confluent, which corresponds to a difficult scenario for HYPR. Spatial and temporal fidelity was investigated by measuring signal intensity profiles through the phantom both orthogonal to as well as along the direction of motion. RESULTS: Spatial fidelity profiles measured from the HYPR processed images yielded full-width-at-half-maximum values very similar to those measured in non-HYPR-processed images. Furthermore, there was no significant spreading of the motion phantom leading edge in HYPR processed images. CONCLUSION: Although HYPR processing has certain characteristic artifacts that are discussed, the technique can be used to improve image quality of highly undersampled time frame images with minimal loss of spatial or temporal fidelity.
Authors: R P Lim; M Shapiro; E Y Wang; M Law; J S Babb; L E Rueff; J S Jacob; S Kim; R H Carson; T P Mulholland; G Laub; E M Hecht Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-09-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Hyun J Jeong; Ty A Cashen; Michael C Hurley; Christopher Eddleman; Christopher Getch; H Hunt Batjer; Timothy J Carroll Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: James H Holmes; Rafael L O'Halloran; Ethan K Brodsky; Thorsten A Bley; Christopher J Francois; Julia V Velikina; Ronald L Sorkness; William W Busse; Sean B Fain Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Petrice M Mostardi; Clifton R Haider; Phillip J Rossman; Eric A Borisch; Stephen J Riederer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Clifton R Haider; Houchun Harry Hu; Norbert G Campeau; John Huston; Stephen J Riederer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Stephen J Riederer; Clifton R Haider; Eric A Borisch; Paul T Weavers; Phillip M Young Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Hee Kwon Song; Lirong Yan; Robert X Smith; Yiqun Xue; Stanislas Rapacchi; Subashini Srinivasan; Daniel B Ennis; Peng Hu; Nader Pouratian; Danny J J Wang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 4.668