BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is most commonly associated with TAR-DNA binding protein (TDP-43) or tau pathology at autopsy, but there are no in vivo biomarkers reliably discriminating between sporadic cases. As disease-modifying treatments emerge, it is critical to accurately identify underlying pathology in living patients so that they can be entered into appropriate etiology-directed clinical trials. Patients with tau inclusions (FTLD-TAU) appear to have relatively greater white matter (WM) disease at autopsy than those patients with TDP-43 (FTLD-TDP). In this paper, we investigate the ability of white matter (WM) imaging to help discriminate between FTLD-TAU and FTLD-TDP during life using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). METHODS: Patients with autopsy-confirmed disease or a genetic mutation consistent with FTLD-TDP or FTLD-TAU underwent multimodal T1 volumetric MRI and diffusion weighted imaging scans. We quantified cortical thickness in GM and fractional anisotropy (FA) in WM. We performed Eigenanatomy, a statistically robust dimensionality reduction algorithm, and used leave-one-out cross-validation to predict underlying pathology. Neuropathological assessment of GM and WM disease burden was performed in the autopsy-cases to confirm our findings of an ante-mortem GM and WM dissociation in the neuroimaging cohort. RESULTS: ROC curve analyses evaluated classification accuracy in individual patients and revealed 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity for WM analyses. FTLD-TAU had significantly more WM degeneration and inclusion severity at autopsy relative to FTLD-TDP. CONCLUSIONS: These neuroimaging and neuropathological investigations provide converging evidence for greater WM burden associated with FTLD-TAU, and emphasise the role of WM neuroimaging for in vivo discrimination between FTLD-TAU and FTLD-TDP.
BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is most commonly associated with TAR-DNA binding protein (TDP-43) or tau pathology at autopsy, but there are no in vivo biomarkers reliably discriminating between sporadic cases. As disease-modifying treatments emerge, it is critical to accurately identify underlying pathology in living patients so that they can be entered into appropriate etiology-directed clinical trials. Patients with tau inclusions (FTLD-TAU) appear to have relatively greater white matter (WM) disease at autopsy than those patients with TDP-43 (FTLD-TDP). In this paper, we investigate the ability of white matter (WM) imaging to help discriminate between FTLD-TAU and FTLD-TDP during life using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). METHODS:Patients with autopsy-confirmed disease or a genetic mutation consistent with FTLD-TDP or FTLD-TAU underwent multimodal T1 volumetric MRI and diffusion weighted imaging scans. We quantified cortical thickness in GM and fractional anisotropy (FA) in WM. We performed Eigenanatomy, a statistically robust dimensionality reduction algorithm, and used leave-one-out cross-validation to predict underlying pathology. Neuropathological assessment of GM and WM disease burden was performed in the autopsy-cases to confirm our findings of an ante-mortem GM and WM dissociation in the neuroimaging cohort. RESULTS: ROC curve analyses evaluated classification accuracy in individual patients and revealed 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity for WM analyses. FTLD-TAU had significantly more WM degeneration and inclusion severity at autopsy relative to FTLD-TDP. CONCLUSIONS: These neuroimaging and neuropathological investigations provide converging evidence for greater WM burden associated with FTLD-TAU, and emphasise the role of WM neuroimaging for in vivo discrimination between FTLD-TAU and FTLD-TDP.
Authors: W T Hu; A Chen-Plotkin; M Grossman; S E Arnold; C M Clark; L M Shaw; L McCluskey; L Elman; H I Hurtig; A Siderowf; V M-Y Lee; H Soares; J Q Trojanowski Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J L Whitwell; C R Jack; J E Parisi; M L Senjem; D S Knopman; B F Boeve; R Rademakers; M Baker; R C Petersen; D W Dickson; K A Josephs Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jennifer L Whitwell; Clifford R Jack; Joseph E Parisi; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Ronald C Petersen; Dennis W Dickson; Keith A Josephs Journal: J Mol Neurosci Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 3.444
Authors: Ian R A Mackenzie; Manuela Neumann; Atik Baborie; Deepak M Sampathu; Daniel Du Plessis; Evelyn Jaros; Robert H Perry; John Q Trojanowski; David M A Mann; Virginia M Y Lee Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Jonathan D Rohrer; Tammaryn Lashley; Jonathan M Schott; Jane E Warren; Simon Mead; Adrian M Isaacs; Jonathan Beck; John Hardy; Rohan de Silva; Elizabeth Warrington; Claire Troakes; Safa Al-Sarraj; Andrew King; Barbara Borroni; Matthew J Clarkson; Sebastien Ourselin; Janice L Holton; Nick C Fox; Tamas Revesz; Martin N Rossor; Jason D Warren Journal: Brain Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Jennifer L Whitwell; Stephen D Weigand; Bradley F Boeve; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez; Nicola J Rutherford; Matthew Baker; David S Knopman; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson; Ronald C Petersen; Rosa Rademakers; Clifford R Jack; Keith A Josephs Journal: Brain Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Keith A Josephs; John R Hodges; Julie S Snowden; Ian R Mackenzie; Manuela Neumann; David M Mann; Dennis W Dickson Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Corey T McMillan; Brian B Avants; Philip Cook; Lyle Ungar; John Q Trojanowski; Murray Grossman Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Corey T McMillan; Jon B Toledo; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Elisabeth M Wood; Eunran Suh; David J Irwin; John Powers; Christopher Olm; Lauren Elman; Leo McCluskey; Gerard D Schellenberg; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Murray Grossman Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Naruhiko Sahara; Pablo D Perez; Wen-Lang Lin; Dennis W Dickson; Yan Ren; Huadong Zeng; Jada Lewis; Marcelo Febo Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Francesca Caso; Maria Luisa Mandelli; Maya Henry; Benno Gesierich; Brianne M Bettcher; Jennifer Ogar; Massimo Filippi; Giancarlo Comi; Giuseppe Magnani; Manu Sidhu; John Q Trojanowski; Eric J Huang; Lea T Grinberg; Bruce L Miller; Nina Dronkers; William W Seeley; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: David J Irwin; Corey T McMillan; EunRan Suh; John Powers; Katya Rascovsky; Elisabeth M Wood; Jon B Toledo; Steven E Arnold; Virginia M-Y Lee; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; John Q Trojanowski; Murray Grossman Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 9.910