PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for allopurinol and oxypurinol and to explore the influence of patient characteristics on allopurinol and oxypurinol pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Data from 92 patients with gout and 12 healthy volunteers were available for analysis. A parent-metabolite model with a two-compartment model for allopurinol and a one-compartment model for oxypurinol was fitted to the data using non-linear mixed effects modelling. RESULTS: Renal function, fat-free mass (FFM) and diuretic use were found to predict differences in the pharmacokinetics of oxypurinol. The population estimates for allopurinol clearance, inter-compartmental clearance, central and peripheral volume were 50, 142 L/h/70 kg FFM, 11.4, 91 L/70 kg FFM, respectively, with a between-subject variability of 33 % (coefficient of variance, CV) for allopurinol clearance. Oxypurinol clearance and volume of distribution were estimated to be 0.78 L/h per 6 L/h creatinine clearance/70 kg FFM and 41 L/70 kg FFM in the final model, with a between-subject variability of 28 and 15 % (CV), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic model provides a means of predicting the allopurinol dose required to achieve target oxypurinol plasma concentrations for patients with different magnitudes of renal function, different body mass and with or without concomitant diuretic use. The model provides a basis for the rational dosing of allopurinol in clinical practice.
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for allopurinol and oxypurinol and to explore the influence of patient characteristics on allopurinol and oxypurinol pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Data from 92 patients with gout and 12 healthy volunteers were available for analysis. A parent-metabolite model with a two-compartment model for allopurinol and a one-compartment model for oxypurinol was fitted to the data using non-linear mixed effects modelling. RESULTS: Renal function, fat-free mass (FFM) and diuretic use were found to predict differences in the pharmacokinetics of oxypurinol. The population estimates for allopurinol clearance, inter-compartmental clearance, central and peripheral volume were 50, 142 L/h/70 kg FFM, 11.4, 91 L/70 kg FFM, respectively, with a between-subject variability of 33 % (coefficient of variance, CV) for allopurinol clearance. Oxypurinol clearance and volume of distribution were estimated to be 0.78 L/h per 6 L/h creatinine clearance/70 kg FFM and 41 L/70 kg FFM in the final model, with a between-subject variability of 28 and 15 % (CV), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic model provides a means of predicting the allopurinol dose required to achieve target oxypurinol plasma concentrations for patients with different magnitudes of renal function, different body mass and with or without concomitant diuretic use. The model provides a basis for the rational dosing of allopurinol in clinical practice.
Authors: Lisa K Stamp; John L O'Donnell; Mei Zhang; Jill James; Christopher Frampton; Murray L Barclay; Peter T Chapman Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2011-02
Authors: G M Peterson; R R Boyle; H W Francis; N W Oliver; J Paterson; R J von Witt; G R Taylor Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1990 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Kelsey M Jordan; J Stewart Cameron; Michael Snaith; Weiya Zhang; Michael Doherty; Jonathan Seckl; Aroon Hingorani; Richard Jaques; George Nuki Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2007-05-23 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: L K Stamp; M L Barclay; J L O'Donnell; M Zhang; J Drake; C Frampton; P T Chapman Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Jade E Hollis-Moffatt; Amanda J Phipps-Green; Brett Chapman; Gregory T Jones; Andre van Rij; Peter J Gow; Andrew A Harrison; John Highton; Peter B Jones; Grant W Montgomery; Lisa K Stamp; Nicola Dalbeth; Tony R Merriman Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Daniel F B Wright; Stephen B Duffull; Tony R Merriman; Nicola Dalbeth; Murray L Barclay; Lisa K Stamp Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Lisa K Stamp; Tony R Merriman; Murray L Barclay; Jasvinder A Singh; Rebecca L Roberts; Daniel F B Wright; Nicola Dalbeth Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Diluk R W Kannangara; Garry G Graham; Daniel F B Wright; Sophie L Stocker; Ian Portek; Kevin D Pile; Murray L Barclay; Kenneth M Williams; Lisa K Stamp; Richard O Day Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-05-28 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Daniel Fb Wright; Matthew P Doogue; Murray L Barclay; Peter T Chapman; Nicholas B Cross; John H Irvine; Lisa K Stamp Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Daniel F B Wright; Nicola Dalbeth; Amanda J Phipps-Green; Tony R Merriman; Murray L Barclay; Jill Drake; Paul Tan; Anne Horne; Lisa K Stamp Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 4.335