OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the exercise self-efficacy scale (ESES) in persons with spinal cord injury. This is the first independent study of ESES psychometric properties, and the first report on ESES test-retest reliability. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: A total of 53 Dutch persons with spinal cord injury. METHODS: Subjects completed the Dutch ESES twice, with 2 weeks between (ESES_1 and ESES_2). Subjects also completed the General self-efficacy scale (GSE), and a questionnaire regarding demographic characteristics and lesion characteristics. Psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the ESES were assessed and compared with those of the original English-language version. RESULTS: The Dutch ESES was found to have good internal consistency (Cronbach's α for ESES_1 = 0.90, ESES_2 = 0.88). Test-retest reliability was adequate (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.70-0.89). For validity, a moderate, statistically significant correlation was found between ESES and the GSE (Spearman's ρ ESES_1 = 0.52, ESES_2 = 0.66, p < 0.01). Furthermore, the psychometric properties of the Dutch ESES were found to be similar to those of the original English version. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the use of the ESES as a reliable and valid measure of exercise self-efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the exercise self-efficacy scale (ESES) in persons with spinal cord injury. This is the first independent study of ESES psychometric properties, and the first report on ESES test-retest reliability. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: A total of 53 Dutch persons with spinal cord injury. METHODS: Subjects completed the Dutch ESES twice, with 2 weeks between (ESES_1 and ESES_2). Subjects also completed the General self-efficacy scale (GSE), and a questionnaire regarding demographic characteristics and lesion characteristics. Psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the ESES were assessed and compared with those of the original English-language version. RESULTS: The Dutch ESES was found to have good internal consistency (Cronbach's α for ESES_1 = 0.90, ESES_2 = 0.88). Test-retest reliability was adequate (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.70-0.89). For validity, a moderate, statistically significant correlation was found between ESES and the GSE (Spearman's ρ ESES_1 = 0.52, ESES_2 = 0.66, p < 0.01). Furthermore, the psychometric properties of the Dutch ESES were found to be similar to those of the original English version. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the use of the ESES as a reliable and valid measure of exercise self-efficacy.
Authors: Maremka Zwinkels; Olaf Verschuren; Kristel Lankhorst; Karin van der Ende-Kastelijn; Janke de Groot; Frank Backx; Anne Visser-Meily; Tim Takken Journal: BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Date: 2015-10-06
Authors: Kristel Lankhorst; Karin van der Ende-Kastelijn; Janke de Groot; Maremka Zwinkels; Olaf Verschuren; Frank Backx; Anne Visser-Meily; Tim Takken Journal: Springerplus Date: 2015-12-22
Authors: Carla F J Nooijen; Marcel W M Post; Annemie L Spooren; Linda J Valent; Rogier Broeksteeg; Tebbe A Sluis; Henk J Stam; Rita J G van den Berg-Emons Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Ingrid Kouwijzer; Linda J M Valent; Marcel W M Post; Lise M Wilders; Anneke Grootoonk; Lucas H V van der Woude; Sonja de Groot Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 3.412