| Literature DB >> 23474658 |
Maristela Peckle1, Marcus S Pires, Tiago M Dos Santos, Erica C R Roier, Claudia B da Silva, Joice A R Vilela, Huarrisson A Santos, Carlos L Massard.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to detect Theileria equi (Laveran 1901) DNA in horses and ticks using real-time PCR and to list the factors associated with infection in animals located in the Seropedica and Petropolis municipalities of the state of Rio de Janeiro. We tested blood samples from 314 horses and samples from 300 ticks, including 191 Amblyomma cajennense, 104 Dermacentor nitens, and 5 Ixodida larvae. Factors inherent to the horse, the ownership, and animal management were obtained from an epidemiological questionnaire and were evaluated in association with the presence of T. equi DNA in the animals. Among the horses in the study, 81 % (n = 253/314) presented T. equi DNA, and the animals of the Seropedica municipality had the highest infection frequency (91 %, n = 128/141, p < 0.001). The factors that had significantly different infection frequencies by chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests (p < 0.2) were included in a logistic regression model using the R programming package. Work and walking activity (odds ratio [OR] = 5.7, CI = 2.3-14.4), reproductive activity (OR = 3.8, CI = 1.3-11.5), and tick infestation (OR = 2.6, CI = 1.1-6.2) were factors that favored the presence of T. equi DNA in the animals (p < 0.05). Among the tick samples, A. cajennense and D. nitens were the identified species. The presence of T. equi DNA was observed in 9.9 % (n = 19/191) of the A. cajennense samples and 3.8 % (n = 4/104) of the D. nitens samples. A multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of A. cajennense on the animals (OR = 4.1, CI = 1.8-9.1) was associated with the presence of T. equi DNA in the horses. In the studied municipalities, activities related to work, walking, and reproduction and the presence of ticks on the horses, particularly an intense infestation of A. cajennense, are factors that lead to infection with T. equi in the horses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23474658 PMCID: PMC3625414 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-013-3360-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitol Res ISSN: 0932-0113 Impact factor: 2.289
Fig. 1Standard curve plotted from serial decimal dilutions of plasmid DNA, containing the Theileria equi 18S rRNA gene (∼1,600 bp). The quantification cycle (C q) value obtained by real-time polymerase chain reaction using Taqman system was plotted as a function of the initial number of plasmid copies
Fig. 2Real-time polymerase chain reaction analytical sensitivity, showing the amplification curves of plasmid DNA, containing the Theileria equi 18S rRNA gene (∼1,600 bp), in serial dilutions (3–30,000 copies)
Bivariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated to Theileria equi infection in horses, by real-time PCR, according to animal characteristics, locality, zootechnical and sanitary management, contact with cattle, animals activity, breeding systems, ticks infestation in Petropolis and Seropedica municipalities, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| Characteristic of the animals and management | Real-time PCR | Bivariate | Multivariate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of animals sampled | Positives (%) |
|
|
| OR | CI 95 % | |
| Gender | |||||||
| Male | 194 | 80.00 | 0.003 | 0.956 | − | − | − |
| Female | 120 | 80.93 | |||||
| Age | |||||||
| ≤2 years | 42 | 78.57 | 0.020 | 0.887 | − | − | − |
| >2 years | 272 | 80.88 | |||||
| Racial definition | |||||||
| Mixed breed | 140 | 83.57 | 0.444 | 0.505 | − | − | − |
| Defined breed | 174 | 78.16 | |||||
| Locality | |||||||
| Petropolis (>400 m) | 173 | 72.25 | 15.870 | 0.000 | –a | ||
| Seropedica (<400 m) | 141 | 90.78 | 0.39 | − | 0.6–3.2 | ||
| Zootechnical and sanitary management | |||||||
| Satisfactory | 150 | 66.67 | 33.803 | 0.000b | − | − | − |
| Unsatisfactory | 164 | 93.29 | |||||
| Contact with cattle | |||||||
| No | 218 | 77.06 | 4.900 | 0.027 | –a | ||
| Yes | 96 | 88.54 | 0.48 | − | 0.2–1.8 | ||
| Activity | |||||||
| Sport/exposition | 118 | 61.02 | 46.200 | 0.000 | –a | ||
| Work/walk | 127 | 92.13 | 0.00 | 5.75 | 2.2–14.4 | ||
| Reproduction | 69 | 92.75 | 0.02 | 3.85 | 1.3–11.5 | ||
| Breeding system | |||||||
| Confined | 19 | 78.95 | − | 0.970c | − | − | − |
| Extensive/semi-extensive | 295 | 78.64 | |||||
| Ticks infestation | |||||||
| No | 153 | 67.97 | 28.713 | 0.000 | –a | ||
| Yes | 161 | 92.55 | 0.03 | 2.63 | 1.1–6.2 | ||
| Animals’ origin | |||||||
| Inside property | 98 | 84.69 | 1.186 | 0.276 | − | − | − |
| Outside property | 216 | 78.70 | |||||
χ value of chi-square test, P p value, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
aCategory reference
bRemoved from the multivariate analysis due to collinearity verified by Spearman test
cFisher’s exact test
Bivariate analysis of factors associated to Theileria equi infection in tick samples, by real-time PCR, according to samples characteristics, as locality, identified species, developmental stage, and tick gender in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| Tick samples characteristics | Real-time PCR | Bivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of animals sampled | Positives (%) |
|
| |
| Altitude | ||||
| <400 m (Seropedica) | 238 | 6.69 | − | 0.28a |
| >400 m (Petropolis) | 62 | 11.29 | ||
| Species | ||||
|
| 191 | 9.95 | 3.96 | 0.07a |
|
| 104 | 3.85 | ||
| Developmental stage | ||||
| Adults | 274 | 8.39 | 2.36 | 0.31 |
| Nymphs | 21 | 0.00 | ||
| Larvae | 5 | 0.00 | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 91 | 15.38 | 11.77 | 0.00 |
| Female | 183 | 4.92 | ||
|
| ||||
| Male | 66 | 18.18 | 7.78 | 0.02 |
| Female | 121 | 5.79 | ||
| Nymphs | 4 | 0.00 | ||
|
| ||||
| Male | 25 | 8.00 | 1.91 | 0.38 |
| Female | 62 | 3.23 | ||
| Nymphs | 17 | 0.00 | ||
χ value of chi-square test, P p value
aFisher’s exact test
Multivariate analysis of Theileria equi positivity in horses by real-time PCR, in relation to the tick species observed on animals in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| Ticks | Real-time PCR | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of animals sampled | Positives (%) |
| OR | CI | |
|
| |||||
| Yes | 150 | 92.7 | 0.00 | 4.10 | (1.8–9.1) |
| No | 164 | 69.5 | –a | − | − |
|
| |||||
| Yes | 100 | 93.0 | 0.18 | − | − |
| No | 214 | 74.8 | –a | − | − |
P p value, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
aCategory reference
Simple logistic regression model to evaluate the Amblyomma cajennense infestation level in comparison with the animals´ positivity for Theileria equi in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
|
| Real-time PCR | Logistic regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of animals sampled | Positives (%) |
| OR | CI | |
| Infestation level | |||||
| Moderate/many | 74 | 90.5 | 0.01 | 2.77 | (1.2–6.4) |
| None/few | 240 | 77.5 | –a | − | − |
P p value, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
aCategory reference