Literature DB >> 23474434

Mixed-methods evaluation in complex programmes: the National Reading Plan in Portugal.

António Firmino da Costa1, Elsa Pegado, Patrícia Ávila, Ana Rita Coelho.   

Abstract

This article highlights the evaluation strategies of a complex programme, which were essentially based on a pluralist, integrating approach founded on the use of mixed methods. The programme under analysis is the National Reading Plan (NRP), a public policy initiative that aims to increase literacy levels and reading habits among the Portuguese population. It was evaluated throughout its first phase, which lasted five years (2006-2011), using an evaluation model that made it possible to continuously and systematically monitor and analyse the way in which this programme was developed and implemented. A number of different quantitative and qualitative methodological operations gathered information from a broad range of sources and social actors, covering the vast set of projects promoted by the NRP. We particularly look at the contributions made by mixing methods to the evaluation of the programme's impacts, and point out its potentials when it comes to evaluating wide-ranging, long and complex programmes.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23474434     DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Program Plann        ISSN: 0149-7189


  3 in total

1.  Multiple and mixed methods in formative evaluation: Is more better? Reflections from a South African study.

Authors:  Willem Odendaal; Salla Atkins; Simon Lewin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Mixed-methods library evaluation integrating the patron, library, and external perspectives: The case of Namibia regional libraries.

Authors:  Moonjung Yim; Michelle Fellows; Chris Coward
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2020-01-27

3.  Methodological pluralism for better evaluations of complex interventions: lessons from evaluating an innovation platform in Australia.

Authors:  J Bailie; F Cunningham; S Abimbola; A Laycock; R Bainbridge; R Bailie; K Conte; M Passey; D Peiris
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-01-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.