Literature DB >> 23474339

Effectiveness of low impact development practices in two urbanized watersheds: retrofitting with rain barrel/cistern and porous pavement.

Laurent M Ahiablame1, Bernard A Engel, Indrajeet Chaubey.   

Abstract

The impacts of urbanization on hydrology and water quality can be minimized with the use of low impact development (LID) practices in urban areas. This study assessed the performance of rain barrel/cistern and porous pavement as retrofitting technologies in two urbanized watersheds of 70 and 40 km(2) near Indianapolis, Indiana. Six scenarios consisting of the watershed existing condition, 25% and 50% implementation of rain barrel/cistern and porous pavement, and 25% rain barrel/cistern combined with 25% porous pavement were evaluated using a proposed LID modeling framework and the Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment (L-THIA)-LID model. The model was calibrated for annual runoff from 1991 to 2000, and validated from 2001 to 2010 for the two watersheds. For the calibration period, R(2) and NSE values were greater than 0.60 and 0.50 for annual runoff and streamflow. Baseflow was not calibrated in this study. During the validation period, R(2) and NSE values were greater than 0.50 for runoff and streamflow, and 0.30 for baseflow in the two watersheds. The various application levels of barrel/cistern and porous pavement resulted in 2-12% reduction in runoff and pollutant loads for the two watersheds. Baseflow loads slightly increased with increase in baseflow by more than 1%. However, reduction in runoff led to reduction in total streamflow and associated pollutant loads by 1-9% in the watersheds. The results also indicate that the application of 50% rain barrel/cistern, 50% porous pavement and 25% rain barrel/cistern combined with 25% porous pavement are good retrofitting options in these watersheds. The L-THIA-LID model can be used to inform management and decision-making for implementation of LID practices at the watershed scale.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23474339     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  6 in total

1.  Retrofitting LID Practices into Existing Neighborhoods: Is It Worth It?

Authors:  Timothy J Wright; Yaoze Liu; Natalie J Carroll; Laurent M Ahiablame; Bernard A Engel
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Performance of a kerb side inlet to irrigate street trees and to improve road runoff water quality: a comparison of four media types.

Authors:  Harsha Sapdhare; Baden Myers; Simon Beecham; Chris Brien
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Green infrastructure and its catchment-scale effects: an emerging science.

Authors:  Heather E Golden; Nahal Hoghooghi
Journal:  WIREs Water       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 6.139

4.  First flush of non-point source pollution and hydrological effects of LID in a Guangzhou community.

Authors:  Jiajun Zeng; Guoru Huang; Haiwan Luo; Yepeng Mai; Haichun Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Cumulative Effects of Low Impact Development on Watershed Hydrology in a Mixed Land-Cover System.

Authors:  Nahal Hoghooghi; Heather E Golden; Brian P Bledsoe; Bradley L Barnhart; Allen F Brookes; Kevin S Djang; Jonathan J Halama; Robert B McKane; Christopher T Nietch; Paul P Pettus
Journal:  Water (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.103

6.  Measuring performance of low impact development practices for the surface runoff management.

Authors:  Wenyu Yang; Kurt Brüggemann; Kiwanuka David Seguya; Ehtesham Ahmed; Thomas Kaeseberg; Heng Dai; Pei Hua; Jin Zhang; Peter Krebs
Journal:  Environ Sci Ecotechnol       Date:  2020-01-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.