Literature DB >> 23474267

Continuous IV Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) (FabAV) for selected North American rattlesnake bite patients.

Sean P Bush1, Steven A Seifert, Jennifer Oakes, Susan D Smith, Tammy H Phan, Sarah R Pearl, Ellen T Reibling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients bitten by North American rattlesnakes and treated with Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) (FabAV), late hematologic abnormalities-persistent, recurrent, or late, new onset of hypofibrinogenemia, prolonged PT/INR, prolonged PTT, and/or thrombocytopenia beyond 48 h post-envenomation-are common, difficult to manage, and may result in morbidity and mortality are common, difficult to manage, and may result in morbidity and mortality. The optimal management of late hematologic abnormalities, particularly the use of further treatment with antivenom, has not been well defined. The current FabAV treatment regimen is to give antivenom as a bolus dose over a one-hour period. We describe our experience using a continuous intravenous infusion of FabAV for late hematologic effects and/or associated bleeding complications in rattlesnake envenomation.
METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational case series of patients envenomated by North American rattlesnakes at three medical centers managed with a continuous intravenous infusion of FabAV for late hematologic abnormalities and/or associated bleeding complications. Indications, dilution and infusion protocols, and duration of therapy were individualized.
RESULTS: Five cases were identified between July 2010 and September 2011. All patients had profound late hematologic abnormalities and/or were associated with bleeding complications. Several patients had received repeat bolus infusions of FabAV, with or without human blood products, with either inadequate or only transient beneficial response. All patients were then managed with a continuous intravenous infusion of FabAV and all appeared to respond to the continuous intravenous infusion of FabAV, titrated to effect, with cessation of progression and, in most cases, improvement in hematologic abnormalities. Rates of infusion varied from 2 to 4 vials per 24 h (mean = 3.1 ± 0.4 vials/day). The termination of FabAV infusion was between day 6 and day 14 from the time of envenomation (mean = 10 ± 3 days), after which hematologic values were normalized or were normalizing in all patients and continued to do so. DISCUSSION: The use of FabAV as a continuous intravenous infusion, particularly after the acute phase of envenomation has passed, provides a continuous source of circulating antibodies to neutralize venom components reaching circulation from tissue stores and allows natural replenishment of hematologic factors such as platelets and/or fibrinogen. This method is an efficient use of FabAV, avoiding the wasteful excess of a bolus dose, may be more effective, eliminating the potential for destruction of hematologic factors when protective antivenom levels are lost between bolus FabAV doses, and appears to be safe. Further assessments of the stability and sterility of the product during infusion are needed. The need to continue hospitalization is the major drawback, but continued observation and inpatient care may be needed for other indications (e.g. bleeding) in this subset of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A continuous intravenous infusion of FabAV between 2 and 4 vials per day, titrated to effect, and continued for 6-14 days post-envenomation appeared to be associated with reversal of late hematologic effects of rattlesnake envenomation and, when combined with indicated human blood products, control of significant bleeding. Continuous intravenous infusion of FabAV may be safer, more efficacious, and more cost-effective than observation without FabAV treatment or as-needed bolus dosing in selected patients with late hematologic abnormalities.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23474267     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicon        ISSN: 0041-0101            Impact factor:   3.033


  5 in total

1.  Recurrent coagulopathy after rattlesnake bite requiring continuous intravenous dosing of antivenom.

Authors:  Charles W Hwang; F Eike Flach
Journal:  Case Rep Emerg Med       Date:  2015-01-12

2.  Comparison of F(ab')2 versus Fab antivenom for pit viper envenomation: a prospective, blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sean P Bush; Anne-Michelle Ruha; Steven A Seifert; David L Morgan; Brandon J Lewis; Thomas C Arnold; Richard F Clark; William J Meggs; Eric A Toschlog; Stephen W Borron; Gary R Figge; Dawn R Sollee; Farshad M Shirazi; Robert Wolk; Ives de Chazal; Dan Quan; Walter García-Ubbelohde; Alejandro Alagón; Richard D Gerkin; Leslie V Boyer
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 4.467

3.  Effectiveness of repeated antivenom therapy for snakebite-related systemic complications.

Authors:  Kyung Hoon Park; Hyungoo Shin; Hyunggoo Kang; Changsun Kim; Hyuk Joong Choi; Kyunghun Yoo; Jaehoon Oh; Tae Ho Lim
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Neotropical Rattlesnake (Crotalus simus) Venom Pharmacokinetics in Lymph and Blood Using an Ovine Model.

Authors:  Edgar Neri-Castro; Melisa Bénard-Valle; Dayanira Paniagua; Leslie V Boyer; Lourival D Possani; Fernando López-Casillas; Alejandro Olvera; Camilo Romero; Fernando Zamudio; Alejandro Alagón
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 5.  Snakebite: When the Human Touch Becomes a Bad Touch.

Authors:  Bryan G Fry
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 4.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.