Literature DB >> 23474070

The relationship between tumor size and stage in early versus advanced ovarian cancer.

Laura Elise Horvath1, Theresa Werner, Kenneth Boucher, Kimberly Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer has a different prognosis between early (I and II) and advanced stage (III and IV). The mechanism of disease progression is unknown, but patients with advanced disease may have a higher propensity for seeding of the abdominal cavity early in the disease process than those with early stage. Theoretically if this is so, then patients with advanced stage should have smaller sized tumors than patients with early stage.
METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients in the tumor registry in 2003-2006. Patients had epithelial ovarian cancer, other cell types were excluded. Only cases with documentation of surgical and pathologic staging and measured dimensions on pathologic specimen were included. Patient stage and all available dimensions measured on diseased ovaries were recorded. The dimensions for each patient were averaged into a single dimension for that patient, and then these measurements were totaled and averaged.
RESULTS: There were 110 patients analyzed: 85 with advanced disease, 25 with early stage. The average measurement was 4.8 cm in advanced disease, and was 10.7 cm in early stage disease. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients with early stage ovarian cancer have diseased ovaries that are more than twice as large as those found in advanced disease. This finding supports the fact that early versus advanced ovarian cancer are 2 separate disease processes. Early stage grows locally and does not disseminate, and advanced stage disseminates while the tumor is still relatively small. Theoretically there may be a factor that separates these 2 into different diseases, where advanced disease patients have a substance produced by their tumor that allows for early dissemination, and early stage lacks this substance and only grows locally. Basic science research comparing the tissue microarrays of early versus advanced stage disease may be able to identify this difference. If the difference is found, perhaps therapy can be targeted against this difference, and screening tests for advanced ovarian cancer can be improved.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23474070     DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  7 in total

1.  Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  K B Mathieu; D G Bedi; S L Thrower; A Qayyum; R C Bast
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Radiomics of high-grade serous ovarian cancer: association between quantitative CT features, residual tumour and disease progression within 12 months.

Authors:  Stefania Rizzo; Francesca Botta; Sara Raimondi; Daniela Origgi; Valentina Buscarino; Anna Colarieti; Federica Tomao; Giovanni Aletti; Vanna Zanagnolo; Maria Del Grande; Nicoletta Colombo; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Modeling EV Kinetics for Use in Early Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Scott Ferguson; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Adv Biosyst       Date:  2020-05-12

4.  Nomogram for predicting postoperative cancer-specific early death in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer based on the SEER database: a large cohort study.

Authors:  Tingting Zhang; Liancheng Zhu
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Prognostic significance of normal-sized ovary in advanced serous epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  E Sun Paik; Ji Hye Kim; Tae Joong Kim; Jeong Won Lee; Byoung Gie Kim; Duk Soo Bae; Chel Hun Choi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Laser scanning laser diode photoacoustic microscopy system.

Authors:  Mohsen Erfanzadeh; Patrick D Kumavor; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2017-11-13

7.  Improving cancer detection through combinations of cancer and immune biomarkers: a modelling approach.

Authors:  Raluca Eftimie; Esraa Hassanein
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 5.531

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.