Literature DB >> 23473350

Effectiveness of lurasidone in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder switched from other antipsychotics: a randomized, 6-week, open-label study.

Joseph P McEvoy1, Leslie Citrome, David Hernandez, Josephine Cucchiaro, Jay Hsu, Andrei Pikalov, Antony Loebel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of switching patients to lurasidone using 3 different dosing strategies.
METHOD: Adults with DSM-IV-defined schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in a nonacute phase of illness were randomized to 1 of 3 lurasidone dosing regimens for the initial 2 weeks of the study: (1) 40 mg/d for 2 weeks; (2) 40 mg/d for 1 week, increased to 80 mg/d on day 8 for week 2 (up-titration group); and (3) 80 mg/d for 2 weeks. Lurasidone was then flexibly dosed (40-120 mg/d) for the subsequent 4 weeks of the study. The preswitch antipsychotic agent was tapered by day 7 to 50% of the original dose and discontinued by the end of week 2. Subjects were stratified on the basis of whether the primary preswitch antipsychotic medication was classified as "sedating" (olanzapine or quetiapine) or "nonsedating" (all other antipsychotics). The primary outcome measure was time to treatment failure, defined as any occurrence of insufficient clinical response, exacerbation of underlying disease, or discontinuation due to an adverse event. The study was conducted from June 2010 to May 2011.
RESULTS: Of 240 subjects treated in this study, 86 (35.8%) were treated with an antecedent sedating antipsychotic, and 154 (64.2%) were treated with an antecedent nonsedating antipsychotic. Nineteen (7.9%) of the 240 patients experienced treatment failure. No clinically relevant differences were observed when the 3 randomized switch groups were compared. Treatment failure rates were 10/86 (11.6%) versus 9/154 (5.8%) among subjects who had been receiving a preswitch sedating versus nonsedating antipsychotic medication, respectively. Consistent with prior studies of lurasidone, there was no signal for clinically relevant adverse changes in body weight, glucose, insulin, lipids, or prolactin; mean improvements in weight and lipids were observed. Movement disorder rating scales did not demonstrate meaningful changes. The incidence of akathisia as an adverse event was 12.5%; only 1 subject (0.4%) discontinued due to akathisia.
CONCLUSIONS: Switching patients to lurasidone can be successfully accomplished by starting at 40 mg/d for 2 weeks, or 80 mg/d for 2 weeks, or 40 mg/d for 1 week followed by 80 mg/d the second week. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01143077. © Copyright 2013 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23473350     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.12m07992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  23 in total

Review 1.  The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.

Authors:  Alan F Schatzberg; DeBattista Charles
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2018-01-15

Review 2.  Systematic Literature Review of the Methods Used to Compare Newer Second-Generation Agents for the Management of Schizophrenia: A focus on Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Gregory Kruse; Bruce J O Wong; Mei Sheng Duh; Patrick Lefebvre; Marie-Hélène Lafeuille; John M Fastenau
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Medication-Induced Akathisia with Newly Approved Antipsychotics in Patients with a Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Koen Demyttenaere; Johan Detraux; Giorgio Racagni; Kristof Vansteelandt
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Impact of Lurasidone on Metabolic Parameters and Prolactin Levels Based on Differences of Psychiatric Diagnosis, Dosage, and Introducing Methods: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Masaru Nakamura; Takahiko Nagamine
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  A review of the pharmacology, efficacy and tolerability of recently approved and upcoming oral antipsychotics: an evidence-based medicine approach.

Authors:  Leslie Citrome
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.749

6.  Does Switching Antipsychotics Ameliorate Weight Gain in Patients With Severe Mental Illness? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dan Siskind; Erin Gallagher; Karl Winckel; Samantha Hollingworth; Steve Kisely; Joseph Firth; Christoph U Correll; Wade Marteene
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 7.  The clinical utility of lurasidone in schizophrenia: patient considerations.

Authors:  Philip D Harvey
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.570

8.  Weight change during long-term treatment with lurasidone: pooled analysis of studies in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jonathan M Meyer; Yongcai Mao; Andrei Pikalov; Josephine Cucchiaro; Antony Loebel
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.659

9.  Long-Term Assessment of Lurasidone in Schizophrenia: Post Hoc Analysis of a 12-Month, Double Blind, Active-Controlled Trial and 6-Month Open-Label Extension Study.

Authors:  Preeya J Patel; Christian Weidenfeller; Andrew P Jones; Jens Nilsson; Jay Hsu
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2020-10-24

Review 10.  Increasing antipsychotic dose versus switching antipsychotic for non response in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Myrto T Samara; Elisabeth Klupp; Bartosz Helfer; Philipp H Rothe; Johannes Schneider-Thoma; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.