Literature DB >> 23473222

Epidemiological profiling of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-positive dogs arriving at a veterinary teaching hospital.

Armando E Hoet1, Joany van Balen, Rocio C Nava-Hoet, Shane Bateman, Andrew Hillier, Jonathan Dyce, Thomas E Wittum.   

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as an important zoonotic and nosocomial pathogen in veterinary settings. Even though human risk factors for MRSA infection and colonization are well known, this information in animals is lacking. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with MRSA carrier dogs on their arrival at a veterinary teaching hospital. A total of 435 dogs were enrolled in the MRSA active surveillance program at The Ohio State University-Veterinary Medical Center over a 1-year period. Dogs were screened for MRSA on arrival, regardless of health status, sex, breed, or age. In addition, an epidemiological survey and medical history were obtained for each dog to identify potential risk factors up to 1 year prior to the appointment. Of 435 dogs included in the study, 25 (5.7%) were MRSA positive, with 86.5% of the isolates classified staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) type II and USA100. Four of the 25 MRSA carrier dogs were healthy, 20 had health issues unrelated to MRSA, and 1 had an active MRSA infection. MRSA was detected in the nares (72%, 18/25), skin lesions (24%, 6/25), and the perianal area (16%, 4/25). Except for previous surgery <90 days (odds ratio [OR]=4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-17.6; p value 0.01), none of the variables related to the previous medical history, dog's management, home environment, and other potential exposures were associated with the MRSA carrier status. However, the profession of the owner was significantly associated, and dogs owned by veterinary students were 20.5 times (95% CI 4.5-93.6; p value≤0.01) more likely to be MRSA positive than dogs owned by clients with different occupations. MRSA-positive dogs were dispersed in different categories, preventing the creation of an epidemiological profile that would allow their early recognition upon arrival to a veterinary hospital. However, the association between veterinary students with MRSA-positive dogs is a concern that deserves further evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23473222     DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2012.1089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis        ISSN: 1530-3667            Impact factor:   2.133


  8 in total

1.  Presence, distribution, and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a small animal teaching hospital: a year-long active surveillance targeting dogs and their environment.

Authors:  Joany van Balen; Christina Kelley; Rocio C Nava-Hoet; Shane Bateman; Andrew Hillier; Jonathan Dyce; Thomas E Wittum; Armando E Hoet
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 2.133

2.  Molecular epidemiological analysis to assess the influence of pet-ownership in the biodiversity of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA in dog- and non-dog-owning healthy households.

Authors:  J C VAN Balen; T Landers; E Nutt; A Dent; A E Hoet
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  High Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus at the Largest Veterinary Teaching Hospital in Costa Rica.

Authors:  Irene Rojas; Elías Barquero-Calvo; Joany C van Balen; Norman Rojas; Lohendy Muñoz-Vargas; Armando E Hoet
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.133

4.  Zoonotic multidrug-resistant microorganisms among small companion animals in Germany.

Authors:  Ursula Kaspar; Alexa von Lützau; Andreas Schlattmann; Uwe Roesler; Robin Köck; Karsten Becker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Hospital-associated infections in small animal practice.

Authors:  Jason W Stull; J Scott Weese
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 2.093

6.  Comparative genomics of MRSA strains from human and canine origins reveals similar virulence gene repertoire.

Authors:  Bruno Penna; Marcella B Silva; André E R Soares; Ana T R Vasconcelos; Mariana S Ramundo; Fabienne A Ferreira; Maria C Silva-Carvalho; Viviane S de Sousa; Renata F Rabello; Paula T Bandeira; Viviane S de Souza; Paul J Planet; Olney Vieira-da-Motta; Ana M N Botelho; Agnes M S Figueiredo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance among Staphylococcus isolated from pets living with a patient diagnosed with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  Cusi Ferradas; Caitlin Cotter; Jonathan H Shahbazian; Sally Ann Iverson; Patrick Baron; Ana M Misic; Amy M Brazil; Shelley C Rankin; Irving Nachamkin; Jacqueline M Ferguson; Roger D Peng; Warren B Bilker; Ebbing Lautenbach; Daniel O Morris; Andrés G Lescano; Meghan F Davis
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.954

Review 8.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Occurrence of ESKAPE Bacteria Group in Dogs, and the Related Zoonotic Risk in Animal-Assisted Therapy, and in Animal-Assisted Activity in the Health Context.

Authors:  Antonio Santaniello; Mario Sansone; Alessandro Fioretti; Lucia Francesca Menna
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.