Literature DB >> 23473061

Comparative study between single-incision and three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Bong-Hyeon Kye1, Junhyun Lee, Wook Kim, Dongjae Kim, Dosang Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is a new procedure used to treat a variety of diseases requiring surgical intervention. The aim of this prospective comparative study is to compare the technical feasibility and safety of single-incision and three-port laparoscopic appendectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Between February 2009 and April 2010, 102 patients with appendicitis were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: single-incision or three-port laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients with perforated appendicitis were not excluded. We analyzed the patients' clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in preoperative patient demographics between the two groups with respect to body mass index (22.03±4.07 kg/m(2) in the single-incision group versus 21.97±3.49 kg/m(2) in the three-port group, P=.930). The pain score on the visual analog scale on postoperative Day 1 was significantly lower in the single-incision group than in the three-port group (3.22±1.22 versus 3.90±1.46, P=.012). Additionally, recovery time to daily life was significantly shorter in the single-incision group than in the three-port group (3.22±1.04 versus 3.94±1.43 days, P=.005). In patients with perforated appendicitis, the single-incision procedure took approximately 10 minutes less than the three-port procedure (44.11±7.75 versus 54.14±32.21 minutes, P=.449), and the postoperative hospital stay (P=.033) and recovery time to daily life (P=.001) were significantly shorter in the single-incision group.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is a feasible and safe procedure, even in patients with perforated appendicitis, and this procedure is even less invasive than three-port laparoscopic surgical techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23473061     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2012.0284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  19 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing single incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Michael Clerveus; Antonio Morandeira-Rivas; Carlos Moreno-Sanz; Maria Luz Herrero-Bogajo; Joaquin Salvelio Picazo-Yeste; Gloria Tadeo-Ruiz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Single port laparoscopy in gastroenterology and hepatology: a fine step forward.

Authors:  Christof Mittermair; Jan Schirnhofer; Eberhard Brunner; Katharina Pimpl; Christian Obrist; Michael Weiss; Helmut G Weiss
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chaorong Xue; Bingqiang Lin; Zhengyuan Huang; Zhi Chen
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in 688 patients: a retrospective comparative analysis.

Authors:  Hung-Hua Liang; Chin-Sheng Hung; Weu Wang; Ka-Wai Tam; Chun-Chao Chang; Hui-Hsiung Liu; Ko-Li Yen; Po-Li Wei
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  The use of expanding ports in laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery may cause more pain: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Jannie Dressler; Lars N Jorgensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jie Hua; Jian Gong; Bin Xu; Tingsong Yang; Zhenshun Song
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Incidence of incisional hernias following single-incision versus traditional laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M B Connell; R Selvam; S V Patel
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 8.  Interventions to optimize recovery after laparoscopic appendectomy: a scoping review.

Authors:  James K Hamill; Jamie-Lee Rahiri; Gamage Gunaratna; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Gasless transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy as a safe and cost-effective alternative surgical procedure for mild acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Koji Munakata; Mamoru Uemura; Junzo Shimizu; Masakazu Miyake; Taishi Hata; Kimimasa Ikeda; Keizo Dono; Masashi Kitada; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Postoperative pain relief using wound infiltration with 0.5% bupivacaine in single-incision laparoscopic surgery for an appendectomy.

Authors:  So Ra Ahn; Dong Baek Kang; Cheol Lee; Won Cheol Park; Jeong Kyun Lee
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2013-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.