J-H Klingler1, R Sircar, M H Deininger, C Scheiwe, E Kogias, U Hubbe.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous vesselplasty in pathological vertebral fractures of the thoracolumbar spine in selected tumor patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven pathological vertebral fractures in nine patients were treated with vesselplasty (Vessel-X®, MAXXSPINE). Nine of eleven vertebras (81.8 %) had major posterior wall deficiency (> 30 %). Clinical and radiological (CT) measures were obtained before and 3 months after the procedure.
RESULTS: The mean VAS improved significantly from preoperative to postoperative (6.9 ± 2.2 to 3.7 ± 2.3; p < 0.05), as did the ODI (59.7 %± 19.2 % to 40.3 %± 24.0 %; p < 0.05). The physical component summary of the SF-36 was significantly improved by the operation (19.2 ± 8.0 to 31.0 ± 16.5; p < 0.05). Symptomatic cement leakage or other operation-associated complications were not observed. Three patients were primarily treated with concomitant minimally invasive stabilization via fixateur interne. One patient had to undergo minimally invasive stabilization via fixateur interne 4 months after vesselplasty due to further collapse of the treated vertebral body.
CONCLUSION: From these preliminary results, vesselplasty appears to be a treatment option worth considering in pathological vertebral fractures, even in the case of posterior wall deficiency. Selected tumor patients might benefit from vesselplasty as a minimally invasive procedure for stabilization of the fractured vertebra, pain control, and improvement in body function and quality of life. Long-term prospective studies with a larger sample size are required to validate these results. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous vesselplasty in pathological vertebral fractures of the thoracolumbar spine in selected tumor patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven pathological vertebral fractures in nine patients were treated with vesselplasty (Vessel-X®, MAXXSPINE). Nine of eleven vertebras (81.8 %) had major posterior wall deficiency (> 30 %). Clinical and radiological (CT) measures were obtained before and 3 months after the procedure.
RESULTS: The mean VAS improved significantly from preoperative to postoperative (6.9 ± 2.2 to 3.7 ± 2.3; p < 0.05), as did the ODI (59.7 %± 19.2 % to 40.3 %± 24.0 %; p < 0.05). The physical component summary of the SF-36 was significantly improved by the operation (19.2 ± 8.0 to 31.0 ± 16.5; p < 0.05). Symptomatic cement leakage or other operation-associated complications were not observed. Three patients were primarily treated with concomitant minimally invasive stabilization via fixateur interne. One patient had to undergo minimally invasive stabilization via fixateur interne 4 months after vesselplasty due to further collapse of the treated vertebral body.
CONCLUSION: From these preliminary results, vesselplasty appears to be a treatment option worth considering in pathological vertebral fractures, even in the case of posterior wall deficiency. Selected tumor patients might benefit from vesselplasty as a minimally invasive procedure for stabilization of the fractured vertebra, pain control, and improvement in body function and quality of life. Long-term prospective studies with a larger sample size are required to validate these results. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities:
Mesh：
Substances：
Year: 2013
PMID： 23471680 DOI： 10.1055/s-0032-1330443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rofo ISSN： 1438-9010