Literature DB >> 23471556

Structural features of two novel alluaudite-like arsenates Cd1.16Zn2.34(AsO4)1.5(HAsO4)(H2AsO4)0.5 and Cd0.74Mg2.76(AsO4)1.5(HAsO4)(H2AsO4)0.5.

Jovica Stojanović1, Tamara Dorđević, Ljiljana Karanović.   

Abstract

Two new compounds, Cd1.16Zn2.34(AsO4)1.5(HAsO4)(H2AsO4)0.5 (1) and Cd0.74Mg2.76(AsO4)1.5(HAsO4)(H2AsO4)0.5 (2), have been prepared hydrothermally. Their crystal structures consist of chains of edge-sharing M1O4(OH0.5)2, M1aO4(OH0.5)2, M2O5(OH0.5), and M2aO5(OH0.5) octahedra (M1, M1a = Zn, Cd; M2, M2a = Zn for 1, and M1, M1a = Mg, Cd; M2, M2a = Mg for 2) that are stacked parallel to (1 0 1) and are connected by the [(AsO4)0.5(AsO3(OH))0.5]2.5- and [(AsO4)0.5(AsO2(OH)2)0.5]2- tetrahedra. These chains produce two types of channels parallel to the c-axis. Cd atoms are located in channels 2, while in channels 1 are situated hydrogen atoms of OH groups. The infrared spectra clearly show the presence of broad O-H stretching and bending vibrations centred at 3236, 2392 1575 and 1396 cm-1 in (1), and 3210, 2379 1602 and 1310 cm-1 in (2). The O-H stretching frequency is in good agreement with O⋯O distances. Furthermore, structural characteristics of compounds with similar alluaudite-like structures were discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical synthesis; Crystal structure; Inorganic materials; X-ray diffraction

Year:  2012        PMID: 23471556      PMCID: PMC3587342          DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Alloys Compd        ISSN: 0925-8388            Impact factor:   5.316


Introduction

The minerals of the alluaudite group and their synthetic counterparts show great compositional and structural variability. Up to date, about 90 natural and synthetic phosphate and arsenates, belonging to the alluaudite structure type were recognized [1–39 and references therein]. The natural alluaudites display chemical compositions varying between the two end-members, Na2Mn(Fe2+,Fe3+)(PO4)3 and □NaMnFe23+(PO4)3, where □ is a vacancy [11]. Moore [40] had determined the crystal structure of alluaudite in the monoclinic C2/c space group and yielded the general structural formula X2X1M1M22(PO4)3 (X are large cations, and M are distorted octahedral centres) with four formula units per unit cell. It represents the parental structure-type of the group referred to as ‘alluaudite type’. Later, according to Leroux et al. [8], X1 and X2 have been relabeled to A1 and A2, respectively. In the structure of alluaudites the three-dimensional heteropolyhedral framework formed by PO4 tetrahedra and MO6 octahedra delimits two types of channels running along the c-axis. Channels 1 are slightly smaller and elongated in the b-direction, and channels 2 are slightly bigger and elongated in the a-direction. The large cation A1 is localized in channel 1 running along (½, 0, z), and (0, ½, z) (4b Wyckoff position in C2/c) and A2 lies in channel 2 running along (0, 0, z) and (½, ½, z) (4a Wyckoff position in C2/c). Hatert et al. [11,34] systematized literature data concerning a variety of alluaudite-like compounds and improved the cation site nomenclature. Besides A1 and A2 they recognized three new A2′, A1′, A1″ positions in C2/c space group: A2′ corresponds to (0, y, ¼) with y ≈ 0 in channel 2 (4e Wyckoff position), A1′ is localized on (0, y, ¼) with y ≈ ½ in channel 1 (4e Wyckoff position), and A1″ site occurs on the general (x, y, z) position in channel 1 (8f Wyckoff position). The new general formula of the group proposed by Hatert et al. [11] is [A2A2′][A1A1′A1″2]M1M22[XO4]3 (X = P5+, As5+), where A sites may be either vacant or partially filled, depending on the cation substitution. The small pentovalent cations X and large variable-valence cations M1 and M2 (mainly divalent and trivalent cations) are distributed over two tetrahedral and two octahedral sites, respectively. A further structure variant was found in Cd1.16Zn2.34(AsO4)1.5(HAsO4)(H2AsO4)0.5 (1) and Cd0.74Mg2.76(AsO4)1.5(HAsO4)(H2AsO4)0.5 (2) during an ongoing research on heteropolyhedral framework structures of divalent metal phosphates and arsenates with potentially interesting structural, physical and chemical properties [41-46]. The present contribution reports the hydrothermal synthesis and crystal structures of the two previously unknown compounds. Furthermore, these compounds represent new structure types. During past three decades, 13 protonated phosphates and arsenates adopting alluaudite structure have been reported in the literature [5,7,8,13,17,23,47-50]. Similarly to 1 and 2 in all these structures hydrogen atoms are in A1″ general position situated in channel 1, while monovalent Ag, K, and Na cations are in channels 1 and 2, located in various A positions. Unit-cell parameters of alluaudite-like compounds having protonated arsenate and phosphate groups are given in Table 1.
Table 1

Unit-cell parameters of alluaudite-like compounds having protonated arsenate and phosphate groups.

Chemical formulaa (Å)b (Å)c (Å)β (°)V (Å3)Reference
AgNi3(PO4)(HPO4)211.865(4)12.117(3)6.467(2)113.82(3)850.6(4)[49]
AgMg3(PO4)(HPO4)211.9126(5)12.1197(6)6.4780(3)113.812(2)855.66(7)[50]
NaCo3(PO4)(HPO4)211.865(2)12.137(2)6.512(1)114.12(1)855.9(2)[5]
AgCo3(PO4)(HPO4)212.035(2)12.235(2)6.541(2)114.14(2)878.9(3)[17]
NaMn3(PO4)(HPO4)212.179(2)12.405(1)6.6602(8)114.616(7)914.7(2)[7]
AgMn3(PO4)(HPO4)212.263(1)12.446(2)6.649(1)114.708(8)921.9(2)[8]
Cd0.74Mg2.76(HAsO4)(H0.5AsO4)211.992(2)12.429(3)6.746(1)112.92(3)926.1(4)This study
NaCo3(AsO4)(HAsO4)212.054(1)12.378(1)6.780(2)113.03(1)931.0(3)[5]
AgCo3(AsO4)(HAsO4)212.159(9)12.438(7)6.782(3)113.2(0)943.0[47]
Na(Zn,Mg)3(AsO4)(HAsO4)212.113(3)12.445(4)6.793(1)112.87(2)943.5(4)[48]
AgZn3(AsO4)(HAsO4)212.169(2)12.495(3)6.755(1)112.8(0)947.1[47]
Cd1.16Zn2.34(AsO4)1.5(HAsO4)(H2AsO4)0.512.250(3)12.491(3)6.816(1)113.62(3)955.6(3)This study
NaMn3(AsO4)(HAsO4)212.299(3)12.735(3)6.893(2)113.587(4)989.5(4)[13]
AgMn3(AsO4)(HAsO4)212.397(2)12.707(2)6.8904(6)113.57(1)994.8(2)[23]
KMn3(AsO4)(HAsO4)212.706(3)12.731(3)6.937(2)113.175(5)1031.6(4)[13]

Experimental

Sample preparation

Single crystals of the title compounds were synthesized hydrothermally from the mixtures of Cd(OH)2 (Alfa Products 89297), 5ZnO·2CO3·4H2O (Alfa Products 308764), 3As2O5·5H2O (99%, Merck) in a molar ratio 1:1:1 for 1 and Cd(OH)2 (Alfa Products 89297), MgO (>97%, Merck 5865), 3As2O5·5H2O (99%, Merck) in a molar ratio 1:2:1 for 2. The initial pH of 1 and 2 were 5 and 6, respectively. The mixture for 1 was transferred into teflon vessel and filled up to approximately 70% of their inner volume with distilled water. The teflon vessels were enclosed in stainless steel autoclaves. The mixture was heated under autogeneous pressure from room temperature to 473 K (for 4 h), held at this temperature 72 h and finally cooled to room temperature 96 h. The mixture for 2 was heated under autogeneous pressure from room temperature to 493 K (for 4 h), held at this temperature 96 h and finally cooled to room temperature 96 h. The resulting products were filtered off, washed thoroughly with distilled water and dried in the air at room temperature. The title compounds crystallized as regular colourless prismatic and lath-like crystals (yield > 50%) up to 100 mm in length (Fig. 1). In both syntheses, the residue represents white powders, which have not been studied.
Fig. 1

Scanning electron micrographs of 1 (left) and 2 (right) crystals.

Chemical analyses

Qualitative chemical analyses were performed using a JEOL JSM-6400 LV scanning electron microscope connected with a LINK energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) unit. The presence of Cd, Zn, As in the 1 and Cd, Mg, As in the 2 was confirmed in studied single-crystals.

Infrared measurements

In order to investigate the hydrous species polarized single-crystal infrared (IR) absorption spectroscopy was performed. The spectra of 1 and 2 were recorded using a Fourier-Transform IR spectrophotometer Bruker Tensor 27 FTIR instrument, equipped with mid-IR glowbar light source and KBr beam splitter, attached to a Hyperion 2000 FTIR microscope with liquid nitrogen-cooled mid-IR, broad-band MCT detector. A total of 128 scans were accumulated between 4000 and 550 cm−1 circular sample aperture 100 μm diameter and ATR 15× objective.

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments

The crystal quality of several single crystals of 1 and 2 were checked with a Nonius Kappa CCD single-crystal four-circle diffractometer (Mo tube, graphite monochromator, CCD detector frame size: 621 × 576 pixels, binned mode), equipped with a 300 μm diameter capillary-optics collimator. Each one sample exhibiting sharp reflection spots was chosen for data collection. Single-crystal X-ray intensity data of 1 were collected on a Bruker-Nonius APEX-II diffractometer with a CCD-area detector, equipped with a graphite monochromator and using Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). A complete sphere of reciprocal space (φ and ω scans) was measured (see Table 2 for details). The intensity data were processed with the Bruker-Nonius programme suite SAINT-Plus and corrected for Lorentz, polarization, background and absorption effects [51]. Single-crystal X-ray intensity data of 2 were collected on Nonius Kappa CCD single-crystal four-circle diffractometer (Mo tube, graphite monochromator, CCD detector frame size: 621 × 576 pixels, binned mode), equipped with a 300 μm diameter capillary-optics collimator. A complete sphere of reciprocal space (φ and ω scans) was measured at room temperature (see Table 2 for details). The intensity data were processed with the Nonius program suite DENZO-SMN [52] and corrected for Lorentz, polarization, and background effects and, by the multi-scan method, for absorption [52,53].
Table 2

Crystallographic data, data collection and refinement details for 1 and 2.

Crystal data
 Chemical formulaCd1.16Zn2.34(AsO4)1.5(HAsO4)(H2AsO4)0.5Cd0.74Mg2.76(AsO4)1.5(HAsO4)(H2AsO4)0.5
 Formula mass (amu)706.36569.26
 Space group (No.)C2 (5)C2 (5)
 α (Å)12.250(3)11.992(2)
 b (Å)12.491(3)12.429(3)
 c (Å)6.816(1)6.7462(13)
 β (°)113.62(3)112.92(3)
 V (Å3)955.6(4)926.1(4)
 Z44
 ρcalc. (g cm−3)4.8804.083
 Crystal dimensions (mm)0.08 × 0.03 × 0.030.08 × 0.03 × 0.03
 μ (cm−1)18.7412.68
 Transmission fractors0.514–0.5700.640–0.684
Data collection
 Crystal-detector distance (mm)3636
 Rotation width (°)22
 Total no. of frames393506
 Collection time per frame (s)300160
 h, k, l ranges−13 ≤ h ≤ 15, −15 ≤ k ≤ 15, −8 ≤ l ≤ 8−14 ≤ h ≤ 14, −15 ≤ k ≤ 15, −8 ≤ l ≤ 8
 No. of data measured55602205
 No. of unique data, including Fo2<019601895
 No. of unique data, with Fo2>2θ(Fo2)17871090
Refinement
 No. of parameters149149
 Number of restraints11
 R(F) for Fo2>2θ(Fo2)0.0210.022
 Rw(Fo2)a0.0410.053
 Extinction coefficient, k b0.0002(1)0.0006(2)
 Goodness of fit1.071.13
 Flack parameter0.50(2)0.58(2)
 (Δρ)max, (Δρ)min (e Å−3)0.75, −1.440.45, −0.68

for 1, and for 2, where .

.

Results and discussion

Structure solution

From cell metrics and intensity distribution a close structural relationship with the ‘alluaudite type’ was expected. In the first step the crystal structures of 1 and 2 were refined starting from the atomic coordinates of AgMn3(AsO4)(HAsO4)2 [23] in the parental monoclinic space group C2/c. This attempt yielded positions of all atoms, but R-indices (all data) were very high, R1 = 0.051, wR2 = 0.115, and R1 = 0.064, wR2 = 0.157 for 1 and 2, respectively. The refinement was poor: the second WGHT parameter was very high, many large correlation matrix elements were observed, and some oxygen atoms became ‘non-positive-definite’. Furthermore, there were numerous reflections that violate the systematic absences and they were rejected because of systematic absence violations, indicating that no c-glide (h 0 l with l = 2n) is present and that the symmetry is lower than C2/c. Possible subgroups of C2/c without a c-glide are C2, P2/n, and P21/n. The presence of an n-glide (h 0 l with h + l = 2n) is also contradicted by many reflections, leaving C2 as the only possible space group for these new compounds. Additionally, many reflections disagreed largely with the model and for the most disagreeable reflections was always greater than , the factor K () was very high for the reflections with low intensity indicating twinning. Having all that in mind, a solving of the crystal structure was attempted with a lower space group. Monoclinic symmetry is maintained, however, the true space group was without an inversion centre (C2), and therefore some positions are split into two configurationally similar but crystallographically distinct sites: 4e is split in 2a and 2b sites, while the general position 8f is split in two general positions 4c. Accordingly, the general formula for alluaudites crystallizing in a space group C2 (Z = 4) is [A2A2′0.5A2′a0.5][A1A1′0.5A1′a0.5A1″2]M10.5M1a0.5M2M2a[X1O4]0.5[X1aO4]0.5[X2O4][X2aO4]. The asymmetric unit with the atom-numbering scheme is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2

The asymmetric unit with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are plotted at the 90% probability level. The long Cd—O bonds are shown as thin lines. White ellipsoids represent the asymmetric unit for alluaudite in C2/c space group. The Zn in 1 and Mg in 2 atoms fill two octahedral M2 and M2a sites, while M1 and M1a (M1 = Cd/Zn and Cd/Mg in 1 and 2, respectively) are mixed octahedral sites.

Changing to the correct space group C2 and taking into account racemic twinning significantly improved the refinement. The R values dropped to 0.021 and 0.022 (R1) as well as 0.041 and 0.053 (wR2) for 1 and 2, respectively. It was necessary to introduce restraints for the atoms in the mixed [M1]2 and [M1a]2 sites, which were refined with the same coordinates and displacement parameters for Zn/Cd and Mg/Cd in 1 and 2, respectively. For Cd atoms in channel 2 successive refinements were performed in which the occupancy of each Cd site, [A2′]2 and [A2′a]2, was allowed to vary independently. These refinements showed that the sum of two occupancy factors is very close to 0.5 in both structures. Therefore, in the final run, the occupancy factors for Cd2 and Cd2a was refined with a fixed sum of occupancy factors of 0.5, i.e. restrains Cd2 + Cd2a0.5− were used. Additionally, these Cd atoms were refined with identical anisotropic displacement parameters. All H atoms were found in a difference Fourier map and successfully refined as riding atoms, with restraints on the O—H bond distances of 0.82 (2) Å and Uiso(H) values at 1.2Ueq(O). Hydrogen atoms were found in general positions near to [A1′]2 and [A1′a]2 positions and their occupancy factors were fixed at 0.5 in order to retain charge balance. Both crystal structures were solved using direct methods with the SIR97 [54]. For the crystal structure refinement SHELXL97 [55] program within the WinGX [56] software package was used. The resulting crystallographic parameters for 1 and 2 are shown in Table 2. Fractional atomic coordinates, equivalent isotropic displacement and anisotropic displacement parameters for both compounds are given in Tables 3–6. Selected interatomic distances of both structures are summarized in Table 7. Bond valence sum calculations were obtained using VALIST software [57] and are shown in Table 8. Hydrogen bonding geometry for both compounds is summarized in Table 9. Drawings of structural details were produced using the ATOMS software [58].
Table 7

Selected bond lengths in 1 and 2.

Cd1.16Zn2.34(AsO4)1.5(HAsO4)(H2AsO4)0.5 (1)Cd0.74Mg2.76(AsO4)1.5(HAsO4)(H2AsO4)0.5 (2)
Cd2—O1a(×2)2.94(1)Zn2a—O1a2.115(5)Cd2—O1a(×2)3.37(3)Mg2a—O1a2.099(8)
Cd2—O3a(×2)3.156(8)Zn2a—O22.135(2)Cd2—O3a(×2)2.78(2)Mg2a—O22.111(4)
Cd2—O5(×2)3.132(7)Zn2a—O32.119(2)Cd2—O5(×2)3.40(2)Mg2a—O32.105(4)
Cd2—O6(×2)2.501(2)Zn2a—O52.116(2)Cd2—O6(×2)2.446(2)Mg2a—O52.103(4)
Cd2—O6a(×2)2.403(2)Zn2a—O5a2.135(3)Cd2—O6a(×2)2.366(2)Mg2a—O5a2.110(6)
Average <Cd2—O><2.83>Zn2a—O6a2.050(3)Average <Cd2—O><2.87>Mg2a—O6a2.078(6)
Cd2a—O1(×2)2.963(7)Average <Zn2a—O><2.11>Cd2a—O1(×2)3.178(8)Average <Mg2a—O><2.10>
Cd2a—O3(×2)2.938(3)As1—O1(×2)1.678(5)Cd2a—O3(×2)2.737(4)As1—O1(×2)1.672(7)
Cd2a—O5a(×2)3.286(3)As1—O2(×2)1.706(2)Cd2a—O5a(×2)3.372(3)As1—O2(×2)1.709(2)
Cd2a—O6(×2)2.268(1)Average <As1—O><1.69>Cd2a—O6(×2)2.237(2)Average <As1—O><1.69>
Cd2a—O6a(×2)2.375(1)As1a—O1a(×2)1.669(5)Cd2a—O6a(×2)2.316(2)As1a—O1a(×2)1.682(7)
Average <Cd2a—O><2.77>As1a—O2a(×2)1.694(2)Average <Cd2a—O><2.77>As1a—O2a(×2)1.695(2)
Zn1/Cd1—O1(×2)2.245(6)Average <As1a—O><1.68>Mg1/Cd1—O1(×2)2.169(7)Average <As1a—O><1.69>
Zn1/Cd1—O3a(×2)2.257(2)As2—O31.678(2)Mg1/Cd1—O3a(×2)2.162(3)As2—O31.690(2)
Zn1/Cd1—O4(×2)2.294(2)As2—O41.707(1)Mg1/Cd1—O4(×2)2.177(4)As2—O41.722(2)
Average <M1—O><2.27>As2—O51.673(2)Average <M1—O><2.17>As2—O51.633(2)
Zn1a/Cd1a—O1a(×2)2.216(5)As2—O61.667(3)Mg1a/Cd1a—O1a(×2)2.122(7)As2—O61.705(3)
Zn1a/Cd1a—O3(×2)2.216(2)Average <As2—O><1.68>Mg1a/Cd1a—O3(×2)2.147(3)Average <As2—O><1.69>
Zn1a/Cd1a—O4a(×2)2.173(2)As2a—O3a1.669(2)Mg1a/Cd1a—O4a(×2)2.107(3)As2a—O3a1.665(2)
Average <M1a—O><2.20>As2a—O4a1.736(2)Average <M1a—O><2.13>As2a—O4a1.711(2)
Zn2—O12.142(6)As2a—O5a1.672(2)Mg2—O12.108(8)As2a—O5a1.679(2)
Zn2—O2a2.102(2)As2a—O6a1.681(2)Mg2—O2a2.068(4)As2a—O6a1.643(3)
Zn2—O3a2.070(2)Average <As2a—O><1.69>Mg2—O3a2.056(3)Average <As2a—O><1.67>
Zn2—O52.135(3)Mg2—O52.085(6)
Zn2—O5a2.150(2)Mg2—O5a2.099(3)
Zn2—O62.064(3)Mg2—O62.045(6)
Average <Zn2—O><2.11>Average <Mg2—O><2.08>
Table 8

Results of bond-valence sum ∑ν (valence units) calculations for 1 and 2.

Cd2Cd2aM1M1aM2M2aAs1As1aAs2As2aνij
1O10.045/0.0900.374/0.7480.3061.272/2.5441.997
O1a0.013/0.0260.333/0.6660.3291.303/2.6061.978
O20.3121.179/2.3581.491
O2a0.3411.218/2.4361.559
O30.048/0.0960.333/0.6660.3261.2721.979
O3a0.007/0.0140.362/0.7240.3721.3032.044
O40.329/0.6581.1761.505
O4a0.374/0.7481.0871.461
O50.008/0.0160.3120.3281.2891.937
O5a0.019/0.0380.3000.3121.2931.924
O60.043/0.0850.294/0.5880.3781.3102.025
O6a0.056/0.1110.220/0.4400.3931.2621.931
νij0.2521.2522.1302.0802.0092.0004.9025.0425.0474.945



2O10.029/0.0580.345/0.6900.3261.293/2.5861.993
O1a0.002/0.0040.352/0.7040.3341.258/2.5161.946
O20.3231.170/2.3401.493
O2a0.3631.215/2.4301.578
O30.095/0.1900.329/0.6580.3281.2311.983
O3a0.009/0.0180.352/0.7040.3751.3172.053
O40.338/0.6761.1291.467
O4a0.367/0.7341.1631.530
O50.002/0.0040.3470.3301.4362.115
O5a0.017/0.0340.3340.3141.2691.934
O60.022/0.0440.368/0.7360.3861.1821.958
O6a0.028/0.0560.297/0.5940.3531.3982.076
νij0.1261.6122.0702.0962.1311.9824.9264.9464.9785.147
Table 9

Hydrogen bonding geometry in structures of 1 and 2.

D—H⋯AD—H (Å)H⋯A (Å)DA (Å)D—H⋯A (°)
Cd1.16Zn2.34(AsO4)1.5(HAsO4)(H2AsO4)0.5 (1)
 O2—H2⋯O4a0.821.752.494(4)149.5
 O4—H4⋯O2a0.821.632.447(4)174.2
 O2a—H2a⋯O40.821.722.447(4)147.3
 O4a—H4a⋯O20.821.722.494(4)156.4
Cd0.74Mg2.76(AsO4)1.5(HAsO4)(H2AsO4)0.5 (2)
 O2—H2⋯O4a0.821.742.477(4)148.0
 O4—H4⋯O2a0.821.682.488(4)167.3
 O2a—H2a⋯O40.821.742.488(4)151.6
 O4a—H4a⋯O20.821.702.477(4)158.0

Description of the crystal structures

In 1 and 2 Cd ions partly occupy [A2′]2 and [A2′a]2 sites in channels 2, as well as two mixed octahedral sites [M1]2 and [M1a]2 (M1 = Cd/Zn and Cd/Mg in 1 and 2, respectively). The Zn in 1 and Mg in 2 fill two octahedral [M2]4 and [M2a]4 sites, while the four As atoms exhibit the usual tetrahedral coordination. Two As atoms are in special [X1]2 and [X1a]2, and two are in general [X2]4 and [X2a]4 positions. The core of the structure is curved chain of variously distorted edge-sharing octahedra running in the direction (Fig. 3). The chains contain edge-sharing M2M2aO8(OH0.5)2 octahedral pairs, which further share opposite edges with adjacent M1O4(OH0.5)2 and M1aO4(OH0.5)2 octahedra. Each As, situated in slightly deformed tetrahedron, shares common O atoms and OH groups from octahedral chains and link them in a layers which are normal to the b-axis (Fig. 4). There are two such layers per unit cell. The adjacent half-unit-cell layers are linked sharing common oxygen atoms (O6 and O6a) to form a heteropolyhedral 3D framework which generates two crystallographically distinct types of parallel channels along [0 0 1].
Fig. 3

The infinite octahedral chain of edge-sharing M2M2aO8(OH0.5)2 pairs (grey) linked by M1O4(OH0.5)2 and M1aO4(OH0.5)2 octahedra (hachured dark grey) in the projection nearly parallel to the ab-plane (a-axis is horizontal and b-axis is vertical).

Fig. 4

Projection of the structure parallel to the (0 1 0) plane (a-axis is horizontal). The octahedral chains (dark grey and hachured dark grey) running parallel to (1 0 1) planes in one layer with arsenate groups (white hachured light grey tetrahedra) and Cd atoms (sphere). Hydrogen atoms were neglect because of clarity.

The cross-section of the channel 1 is a flattened hexagon with O2, O2a, O4, O4a, O6 and O6a atoms at their vertices. The [A1]4 site in C2 (corresponds to [A1]4 site in C2/c) is in the centre of the hole, while [A1′]2 and [A1′a]2 sites are at centres of upper and lower basal planes (Fig. 5). The channel 2 can be described as a sequence of pairs of antiprisms, sharing common bases, i.e. two O6 and two O6a atoms. In the vertices of antiprisms are in hydrogen bonding not involved oxygen atoms, which form the walls of the channel 2. Almost perfectly in the canter of the common base are situated Cd2 and Cd2a atoms, alternatively along [0 0 1] in [A2′]2 and [A2′a]2 sites, respectively (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

The cross-section of the channels along [0 0 1] (a-axis is horizontal) with Cd and H atoms in channels 2 and 1, respectively. In both channel 1 presented in a figure, the half of hydrogen atoms is arbitrary omitted in order to illustrate their half-occupied positions.

The same structure can by alternatively described as a structure, which hosts two type of layers denoted as I and II, which are parallel to the (1 0 0) plane (Fig. 6). The layer I is composed of the [(As1O4)0.5(As1O2(OH)2)0.5]2− tetrahedra, which act as a bridges connecting adjacent M1O4(OH0.5)2 octahedra via two symmetry equivalents of O1 forming an octahedral–tetrahedral chain along c-axis. In the same way M1aO4(OH0.5)2 octahedra with the [(As1aO4)0.5(As1aO2(OH)2)0.5]2− tetrahedra generate similar chains. They are linked in double chains with very strong hydrogen bonds [A⋯D = 2.447–2.494 Å in 1 and 2.477–2.488 Å in 2] situated in channels 1 and involving all H2, H2a, H4 and H4a atoms. The double chains are further linked by Cd2 and Cd2a atoms located between double chains in channels 2 and linking them in a layer I (Fig. 6a).
Fig. 6

Projection of a single polyhedral layer I (a) and layer II (b) parallel to the (1 0 0) plane (b-axis is vertical). Hachured dark grey octahedra represent the mixed site coordination polyhedra, while dark grey are for M2M2aO8(OH0.5)2 pairs. Tetrahedra represent [(AsO4)0.5(AsO3(OH))0.5]2.5− and [(AsO4)0.5(AsO2(OH)2)0.5]2− groups. The largest circles indicate Cd atoms (light grey for Cd2 and dark grey for Cd2a) in channel 2, the middle are for oxygen, whereas the smallest circles are for hydrogen atoms. Some hydrogen atoms are arbitrary omitted in order to illustrate their statistical distribution.

The adjacent layers I are separated from each other by the layers II, composed of edge-sharing M2M2aO8(OH0.5)2 octahedral pairs linked by [(As2O4)0.5(As2O3(OH))0.5]2.5− and [(As2aO4)0.5(As2aO3(OH))0.5]2.5− tetrahedra. The pairs are oriented parallel to each other along the c-axis, while they have a zigzag arrangement along the b-axis. In these layers each tetrahedra are linked through their vertices to four M2 in the same layer II, two M1 from layer I and two Cd atoms in the channel 2 (Fig. 6b).

Octahedral [M1]2, [M1a]2, [M2]4 and [M2a]4 sites

The 6-coordinated M2+ cations form four distinct octahedra: M1O4(OH0.5)2, M1aO4(OH0.5)2, M2O5(OH0.5) and M2aO5(OH0.5). In both structures the general [M2]4 and [M2a]4 sites are occupied by Zn in 1 and Mg in 2, while special [M1]2 and [M1a]2 are mixed sites occupied by Cd/Zn and Cd/Mg in 1 and 2, respectively. Average M2—O and M2a—O bond lengths are 2.111(3) and 2.112(3) Å in 1 and 2.077(4) and 2.101(5) Å in 2, which are in good agreement with calculated values (2.12 and 2.10 Å, respectively) for the sum of effective ionic radii of the Zn2+ and O2− ions in 1 and Mg2+ and O2− ions in 2 [60]. Average M1—O and M1a—O lengths are a bit longer than M2—O and M2a—O, i.e. 2.265(3) and 2.202(3) Å in 1 and 2.169(4) and 2.125(4) Å in 2, respectively, indicating the incorporation of the larger Cd cation. The occupancy factors for [M1]2 and [M1a]2 sites show the different cation distributions: Cd10.86/Zn10.14, Cd1a0.46/Zn1a0.54 in 1 and Cd10.33/Mg10.67, Cd1a0.16/Mg1a0.84 in 2 (calculated bond lengths are 2.27, 2.20, 2.23, 2.15 Å, respectively).1

Tetrahedral [X1]2, [X1a]2, [X2]4 and [X2a]4 sites and hydrogen bonding

The four crystallographically non-equivalent [(As1O4)0.5(As1O2(OH)2)0.5]2−, [(As1aO4)0.5(As1aO2(OH)2)0.5]2−, [(As2O4)0.5(As2O3(OH))0.5]2.5− and [(As2aO4)0.5(As2aO3(OH))0.5]2.5− tetrahedra are all protonated. Two O2 and two O2a atoms, of the [(As1O4)0.5(As1O2(OH)2)0.5]2− and [(As1aO4)0.5(As1aO2(OH)2)0.5]2− groups are bonded to atoms H2 and H2a, while the O4 and O4a, of the [(As2O4)0.5(As2O3(OH))0.5]2.5− and [(As2aO4)0.5(As2aO3(OH))0.5]2.5− groups, are bonded to atoms H4 and H4a, respectively (Fig. 5). All H atoms are located on half-occupied general positions somewhat off the [A1′]2 and [A1′a]2 sites, so that only half of the sites are occupied by OH and another half are occupied by O. Accordingly, OH groups are statistically distributed among four positions within the channel 1 and are involved in a similarly strong hydrogen bonds. Due to the symmetry requirements [(As1O4)0.5(As1O2(OH)2)0.5]2− and [(As1aO4)0.5(As1aO2(OH)2)0.5]2− tetrahedra are doubly protonated (two symmetry equivalents of O2 and O2a, respectively) and act as hydrogen bond donors to the oxygens O4a and O4 in one half, and as single hydrogen bond acceptors from another OH groups (O4H4 and O4aH4a, respectively) in the second half of unit cells. Similarly, the already mentioned OH groups (O4H4 and O4aH4a) act as hydrogen bond donors toward the oxygens O2a and O2, in one half, and as single hydrogen bond acceptors from O2aH2a and O2H2, respectively, in the second half time (Fig. 5). Expectedly, the As—OH bond distances are slightly elongated in comparison to the other As—O bonds in tetrahedra (see Table 7).

Ten-coordinated [A2′]2 and [A2′a]2 sites

Both Cd2 and Cd2a atoms have ten O ligands, four at shorter and six at longer distance in both structures (Table 7). The Cd2O10 and Cd2aO10 polyhedra are interconnected in chains running in the c-direction, where every Cd2O10 polyhedron shares two opposite edges with neighbouring Cd2aO10 polyhedra. The symmetry of the both Cd sites and their coordination polyhedra are 2, which place the two Cd atoms on neighbouring two-fold axes. Two nearest Cd atoms (Cd2 and Cd2a) are bridged by two O atoms (O6 and O6a) at maximum distances of 2.5 Å. With these closest O atoms (two symmetry-equivalents of O6 and two of O6a), Cd2 and Cd2a lie in an almost perfectly planar plane normal to the b-axis which is the central part of the chain (Figs. 4 and 5). The Cd2⋯Cd2a distance along the chain extension is 3.4550(3) Å in 1 and 3.3744(5) Å in 2, which is longer than the sum of the Van der Waals radii [3.16 Å for 2 × rCd] [61]. Assuming O atoms at longer distances the CdO10 coordination polyhedra can be described as containing two adjacent parts: a distorted trigonal prism (housing the four shortest and two longer bonds) and a highly irregular square antiprism sharing its square base (with two symmetry-equivalents of O6 and two of O6a in vertices) with one lateral face of the trigonal prism. The CdO10 polyhedra are characterized by average Cd2—O and Cd2a—O bond lengths of 2.827(6) Å for Cd20.21□0.79 and 2.766(3) Å for Cd2a0.79□0.21 in 1 and 2.872(3) Å for Cd20.10□0.90 and 2.768(8) Å for Cd2a0.90□0.10 in 2, respectively.

Bond valence calculations

The bond valence values for cadmium atoms situated in channel 2 are lower than 1.8 v.u., indicating that these sites are significantly underbonded, partly due to incomplete occupation of these sites, and structure disorder. The bond valence sums for the oxygen atoms, which are not involved in hydrogen bonding, have values in very good agreement to assumed and range from 1.92 to 2.04 v.u. in 1 and 1.93 to 2.12 v.u. in 2. Oppositely, values for those oxygen atoms involved in hydrogen bonding range from 1.46 to 1.56 v.u. in 1 and 1.47–1.58 v.u. in 2. Having in mind the fact that O2, O2a, O4, and O4a are alternately hydrogen bonding donors and acceptors to one another, bond valence values for both compounds are very well balanced. Bond valence sum calculations for both 1 and 2 alluaudites are shown in Table 8.

FT-IR analysis results

In order to investigate the hydroxyl group content of the title compounds polarized single-crystal FT-IR spectra of 1 and 2 were recorded. The presence of hydrogen bonding can be detected by infrared spectroscopy in the domains of the OH− stretching modes. Due to the strong absorption bands under 1000 cm−1 could not be analysed (there was not enough sample for the KBr micro-pallet method). However, the distinct frequency ranges for 1 and 2 may be assigned as follows: the spectral region between 3500 and 1000 cm−1 shows a peculiar increase in “background absorption” (Figs. 7a and b), which is a typical feature of compounds with very short, i.e., very strong hydrogen bonds (e.g., Sr5(As2O7)2(AsO3OH) [62]; Sr4Cu3(AsO4)2(AsO3OH)4 3H2O [42] and references therein), which is the case with both 1 and 2. Because of the broad band shape, As—O tetrahedral stretching vibrations and lattice modes are superimposed in the low-energy region of the spectrum. The infrared spectrum clearly shows the presence of broad O—H stretching and bending vibrations centred around 3236, 2300/1310 cm−1 and 3210, 2390/1390 cm−1 for 1 and 2 respectively [63]. According to the d–ν correlation for hydrogen bonds this wavenumbers are in very good agreement with the refined H⋯O bond lengths [64]. Bands around 3200 cm−1 agree well with H⋯O bond lengths around 1.73 Å, and bands around 2300 cm−1 are in good agreement with H⋯O bond lengths around 1.62 Å.
Fig. 7

Polarized single-crystal FT–IR spectra of 1 (a) and 2 (b). O—H stretching bands can be observed in one of polarized spectra (when polarization beam was parallel to the elongation of the crystal), whereas they are of low intensity in the other polarization direction (perpendicular to the elongation of the crystal).

Conclusion

This research has confirmed that synthesis of divalent cation arsenates with cadmium by low-temperature hydrothermal method can yield novel structure types with interesting crystal-chemical properties, such as short hydrogen bond lengths, where oxygen atoms are alternately hydrogen bonding donors and acceptors to each other. Very probably the twinning and incorporation of Cd/Zn in 1 and Cd/Mg in 2 results in the change of symmetry from C2/c to C2, which is a subgroup of the space group C2/c. This transition to the subgroup C2 reduced symmetry, thus causing a splitting of general position 8f into two positions of multiplicity of 4 and one special 4e into two with multiplicities of 2 allowing a distortion of the structure. In 1 and 2 structures, Cd ions partly occupy both [A2′]2 + [A2′a]2 disordered sites in channels running along c-axis, while Zn in 1 and Mg in 2 fill two non-mixed octahedral [M2]4 + [M2a]4 sites, and together with Cd ions form two mixed octahedral sites [M1]2 + [M1a]2. Moreover, the lattice volume increases with the increase of concentration of the largest cation, Cd2+. This research showed that metal-arsenates are not fully crystallographically defined. Additional investigation of this system would lead to full knowledge, which topologies are likely to form under which conditions (e.g., temperature, pressure, ratios of ionic radii, pH, …). Moreover, facts obtained in this study might be useful to the phosphates, vanadates and silicates with analogous structure. Furthermore, permanent research of arsenic containing compounds should be carried out because of potentially appealing features of these compounds and since arsenic is recognized to be one of the most lethal chemical elements for our environment. Therefore, this is the main reason why arsenates are not examined in a satisfactory manner and thus, their crystal-chemical characteristics are frequently indefinite. Authors of this study have hope that this is just an introduction to a thorough research which will be the subject of our future work.
Table 3

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters for 1. Ueq according to Fischer and Tillmanns [59]. For the H atoms Uiso is shown.

AtomxyzUiso/Ueq (Å2)Occ. (<1)
Cd2½0.4731(8)½0.0390(3)0.214(2)
Cd2a½0.5186(2)00.0390(3)0.787(2)
Zn1/Cd100.2811(1)½0.0130(3)0.144(9)/0.856(9)
Zn1a/Cd1a00.7139(1)00.0115(4)0.545(9)/0.455(9)
Zn20.2110(1)0.1612(1)0.3756(1)0.0145(3)
Zn2a0.2029(1)0.8441(1)−0.1358(2)0.0117(2)
As100.3074(1)00.0112(3)
As1a00.6917(1)½0.0072(3)
As20.2838(1)0.3900(1)0.6388(1)0.0093(2)
As2a0.2790(1)0.6141(1)0.1305(1)0.0097(2)
O10.0370(5)0.2292(5)0.2173(8)0.015(1)
O1a0.0366(5)0.7655(5)−0.2787(7)0.011(1)
O20.1136(1)0.3891(2)0.0098(2)0.010(1)
H20.09310.45180.00690.013
O2a0.1114(1)0.6084(2)−0.4895(2)0.017(1)
H2a0.09230.5463−0.47970.020
O30.3483(1)0.3271(2)0.8751(2)0.013(1)
O3a0.3354(1)0.6778(2)0.3654(2)0.015(1)
O40.1380(1)0.4164(2)0.5861(2)0.013(1)
H40.12510.48060.56280.015
O4a0.1308(1)0.5860(2)0.0752(2)0.019(1)
H4a0.12250.52140.085190.023
O50.2877(1)0.3176(2)0.4353(2)0.010(1)
O5a0.2839(1)0.6896(2)−0.0683(2)0.014(1)
O60.3543(1)0.5068(2)0.6657(2)0.017(1)
O6a0.3530(1)0.4993(2)0.1423(2)0.020(1)
Table 4

Anisotropic displacement parameters for 1 with estimated standard deviation in parentheses. The anisotropic displacement parameters are defined as: .

AtomU11U22U33U23U13U12
Cd2/Cd2a0.0109(4)0.0911(9)0.0120(4)00.0015(3)0
Zn1/Cd10.0114(5)0.0164(6)0.0127(5)00.0062(4)0
Zn1a/Cd1a0.0091(6)0.0145(7)0.0120(6)00.0055(4)0
Zn20.0193(5)0.0127(5)0.0148(5)0.0015(5)0.0103(4)0.0031(5)
Zn2a0.0152(5)0.0093(5)0.0134(5)−0.0026(4)0.0086(4)−0.0013(4)
As10.0129(6)0.0135(7)0.0058(6)00.0022(5)0
As1a0.0098(6)0.0037(7)0.0071(6)00.0022(5)0
As20.0126(4)0.0069(4)0.0085(4)−0.0005(3)0.0042(4)0.0008(3)
As2a0.0133(4)0.0092(5)0.0076(4)−0.0018(4)0.0051(4)−0.0021(4)
O10.013(3)0.021(4)0.009(3)0.003(3)0.001(2)−0.001(5)
O1a0.013(2)0.015(3)0.008(2)−0.007(2)0.005(2)−0.003(3)
O20.012(3)0.003(3)0.020(3)0.004(2)0.009(2)0.001(2)
O2a0.013(3)0.016(3)0.017(3)0.001(3)−0.001(2)0.017(1)
O30.011(3)0.009(3)0.003(2)0.005(2)0.007(2)0.013(1)
O3a0.023(3)0.014(3)0.009(3)−0.002(2)0.008(2)−0.002(2)
O40.013(3)0.007(3)0.020(3)0.002(3)0.007(2)0.002(2)
O4a0.012(3)0.019(3)0.028(3)0.001(3)0.010(2)−0.001(3)
O50.013(3)0.010(3)0.008(3)−0.002(2)0.005(2)0.001(2)
O5a0.012(3)0.020(3)0.008(2)−0.000(2)−0.003(2)−0.000(3)
O60.013(2)0.008(3)0.024(2)0.008(2)0.001(2)−0.001(2)
O6a0.016(2)0.018(3)0.025(2)−0.006(3)0.007(2)0.020(1)
Table 5

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters for 2. Ueq according to Fischer and Tillmanns [63]. For the H atoms Uiso is shown.

AtomxyzUiso/Ueq (Å2)Occ. (<1)
Cd2½0.509(2)½0.360(4)0.096(2)
Cd2a½0.5053(2)00.360(4)0.904(2)
Mg1/Cd100.2806(3)½0.018(1)0.674(5)/0.326(5)
Mg1a/Cd1a00.7152(3)00.015(1)0.841(6)/0.159(5)
Mg20.2078(3)0.1657(4)0.3708(5)0.008(1)
Mg2a0.2006(3)0.8460(4)−0.1419(6)0.010(1)
As100.3131(1)00.0125(2)
As1a00.6911(1)−½0.0115(5)
As20.28247(9)0.38891(9)0.6400(2)0.0121(4)
As2a0.2806(1)0.61845(9)0.1327(2)0.0147(4)
O10.0353(6)0.2360(6)0.219(1)0.013(2)
O1a0.0351(6)0.7636(7)−0.273(1)0.015(2)
O20.1169(1)0.3966(3)0.0186(2)0.014(2)
H20.094400.459400.010400.017
O2a0.1164(1)0.6087(3)−0.4805(2)0.019(2)
H2a0.096500.54600−0.475400.023
O30.3529(1)0.3284(3)0.8811(2)0.014(2)
O3a0.3397(2)0.6815(3)0.3688(2)0.015(2)
O40.1315(2)0.4111(3)0.5842(2)0.017(2)
H40.116800.475600.565000.021
O4a0.1317(2)0.5934(3)0.0819(2)0.017(2)
H4a0.121400.528400.087600.020
O50.2873(2)0.3176(3)0.4402(2)0.019(2)
O5a0.2869(2)0.6947(3)−0.0682(2)0.011(2)
O60.3533(2)0.5104(3)0.6701(2)0.015(1)
O6a0.3531(2)0.5051(3)0.1432(2)0.017(1)
Table 6

Anisotropic displacement parameters for 2 with estimated standard deviation in parentheses. The anisotropic displacement parameters are defined as: .

AtomU11U22U33U23U13U12
Cd2/Cd2a0.0178(6)0.072(2)0.0163(6)00.0041(5)0
Mg1/Cd10.019(2)0.021(2)0.011(2)00.003(1)0
Mg1a/Cd1a0.019(2)0.015(3)0.014(2)00.011(2)0
Mg20.012(2)0.008(3)0.005(2)0.001(2)0.005(2)0.001(2)
Mg2a0.012(2)0.009(3)0.007(2)0.002(2)0.003(2)0.004(2)
As10.016(1)0.013(1)0.0063(9)00.0011(8)0
As1a0.016(1)0.010(1)0.0080(9)00.0047(7)0
As20.0181(7)0.0088(8)0.0084(7)−0.0009(5)0.0040(5)0.0000(5)
As2a0.0200(7)0.0168(9)0.0083(7)−0.0016(5)0.0066(5)−0.0012(5)
O10.014(3)0.017(5)0.009(4)0.000(3)0.006(3)0.000(3)
O1a0.017(3)0.013(4)0.016(4)−0.006(4)0.007(3)0.002(4)
O20.016(4)0.010(4)0.014(4)0.006(4)0.004(3)0.007(4)
O2a0.023(4)0.012(5)0.026(4)0.005(4)0.014(3)0.007(4)
O30.020(4)0.019(5)0.005(4)0.004(3)0.008(3)0.003(3)
O3a0.024(4)0.010(5)0.005(3)−0.003(3)0.000(3)−0.004(3)
O40.012(4)0.017(5)0.021(4)0.007(4)0.005(3)0.010(4)
O4a0.022(4)0.013(4)0.017(3)0.001(4)0.010(3)0.007(4)
O50.019(4)0.025(4)0.006(4)−0.005(4)−0.001(3)0.000(4)
O5a0.021(4)0.004(4)0.007(4)−0.003(3)0.004(3)−0.001(4)
O60.016(3)0.012(4)0.010(3)0.002(3)−0.003(2)0.009(4)
O6a0.021(3)0.016(4)0.020(3)0.002(4)0.012(3)0.014(4)
  11 in total

1.  Multiparametric scaling of diffraction intensities.

Authors:  Zbyszek Otwinowski; Dominika Borek; Wladyslaw Majewski; Wladek Minor
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Na(1.50)Mn(2.48)Al(0.85)(PO4)3, a new synthetic alluaudite-type compound.

Authors:  Frédéric Hatert
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2005-12-10       Impact factor: 1.172

3.  [Zn3(PO4)2(H2O)(0.8)(NH3)(1.2)].

Authors:  Jovica Stojanović; Tamara Dordević; Ljiljana Karanović
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  AgNi3(PO4)(HPO4)2: an alluaudite-like structure.

Authors:  Ridha Ben Smail; Tahar Jouini
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  AgCo3PO4(HPO4)2.

Authors:  Abderrahmen Guesmi; Ahmed Driss
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2001-12-22       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  Cd2Cu(PO4)2.

Authors:  Jovica Stojanović; Tamara Dordvić; Ljiljana Karanović
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 1.172

7.  The alluaudite-like arsenate NaCaMg(3)(AsO(4))(3).

Authors:  Anissa Haj Abdallah; Amor Haddad
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-05-21

8.  Na(1.72)Mn(3.2)8(AsO(4))(3).

Authors:  Brahim Ayed; Mohamed Krifa; Amor Haddad
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 1.172

9.  Sr, Ba and Cd arsenates with the apatite-type structure.

Authors:  Tamara Dordević; Sabina Sutović; Jovica Stojanović; Ljiljana Karanović
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 1.172

10.  Silver trimagnesium phosphate bis-(hydrogenphosphate), AgMg(3)(PO(4))(HPO(4))(2), with an alluaudite-like structure.

Authors:  Abderrazzak Assani; Mohamed Saadi; Mohammed Zriouil; Lahcen El Ammari
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-12-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.