PURPOSE: Scintigraphy is considered the most accurate technique for the measurement of gastric emptying (GE) but, for patients in the intensive care unit, it is technically demanding, involves radiation and can interfere with care. The (13)C-octanoate breath test ((13)C-OBT) is a simple, non-invasive technique that does not involve radiation exposure. AIM: To evaluate the performance of the (13)C-OBT in the assessment of GE in critically ill patients. METHODS: The GE was assessed in 33 mechanically ventilated patients (23 M; 54.3 ± 3.0 yrs; APACHE II: 22.0 ± 1.1). Following test meal administration (100 ml Ensure(®)), concurrent scintigraphic measurement and breath samples ((13)C-OBT) were collected over 4 h. Scintigraphic meal retention was determined and the gastric emptying coefficient (GEC) and half emptying time [t50(BT)] were calculated for the (13)C-OBT. Delayed GE was defined as meal retention >13 % at 180 min. RESULTS: Delayed GE was identified in 27/33 patients. Meal retention correlated modestly with t50(BT) (r = 0.55-0.66; P < 0.001) and well with GEC (r = -0.63 to -0.74; P < 0.0001). The strength of agreement between the two techniques was highest between GEC and retention at 120 min. The best cut-off GEC for defining delayed GE was 3.25 (AUC = 0.75; 95 % CI = 0.52-0.99; P = 0.05), with 89 % sensitivity and 67 % specificity to detect delayed GE. The GE was delayed in all (23/23) patients with feed intolerance (GRV > 250 ml) on scintigraphy and 91 % (21/23) patients on (13)C-OBT. CONCLUSION: In critical illness, there was a correlation between (13)C-OBT and gastric scintigraphy, with GEC performing as a better and more sensitive marker of detecting delayed GE than t50. However the relatively wide 95 % confidence intervals suggest that (13)C-OBT is more suitable as a technique to assess GE in a group setting for research studies rather than for individual patients in clinical practice.
PURPOSE: Scintigraphy is considered the most accurate technique for the measurement of gastric emptying (GE) but, for patients in the intensive care unit, it is technically demanding, involves radiation and can interfere with care. The (13)C-octanoate breath test ((13)C-OBT) is a simple, non-invasive technique that does not involve radiation exposure. AIM: To evaluate the performance of the (13)C-OBT in the assessment of GE in critically illpatients. METHODS: The GE was assessed in 33 mechanically ventilated patients (23 M; 54.3 ± 3.0 yrs; APACHE II: 22.0 ± 1.1). Following test meal administration (100 ml Ensure(®)), concurrent scintigraphic measurement and breath samples ((13)C-OBT) were collected over 4 h. Scintigraphic meal retention was determined and the gastric emptying coefficient (GEC) and half emptying time [t50(BT)] were calculated for the (13)C-OBT. Delayed GE was defined as meal retention >13 % at 180 min. RESULTS: Delayed GE was identified in 27/33 patients. Meal retention correlated modestly with t50(BT) (r = 0.55-0.66; P < 0.001) and well with GEC (r = -0.63 to -0.74; P < 0.0001). The strength of agreement between the two techniques was highest between GEC and retention at 120 min. The best cut-off GEC for defining delayed GE was 3.25 (AUC = 0.75; 95 % CI = 0.52-0.99; P = 0.05), with 89 % sensitivity and 67 % specificity to detect delayed GE. The GE was delayed in all (23/23) patients with feed intolerance (GRV > 250 ml) on scintigraphy and 91 % (21/23) patients on (13)C-OBT. CONCLUSION: In critical illness, there was a correlation between (13)C-OBT and gastric scintigraphy, with GEC performing as a better and more sensitive marker of detecting delayed GE than t50. However the relatively wide 95 % confidence intervals suggest that (13)C-OBT is more suitable as a technique to assess GE in a group setting for research studies rather than for individual patients in clinical practice.
Authors: Adam M Deane; Antony V Zaknic; Matthew J Summers; Marianne J Chapman; Kylie Lange; Mark A Ritz; Geoff Davidson; Michael Horowitz; Robert J L Fraser Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: D Ziegler; P Schadewaldt; A Pour Mirza; R Piolot; B Schommartz; M Reinhardt; H Vosberg; H Brösicke; F A Gries Journal: Diabetologia Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Matthew Q Bromer; Steve B Kantor; David A Wagner; Linda C Knight; Alan H Maurer; Henry P Parkman Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Gan van Samkar; Wietse J Eshuis; Marike Lemmers; Dirk J Gouma; Roel J Bennink; Markus W Hollmann; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Olivier R C Busch Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Giuseppe Citerio; Jan Bakker; Matteo Bassetti; Dominique Benoit; Maurizio Cecconi; J Randall Curtis; Glenn Hernandez; Margaret Herridge; Samir Jaber; Michael Joannidis; Laurent Papazian; Mark Peters; Pierre Singer; Martin Smith; Marcio Soares; Antoni Torres; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Jean-François Timsit; Elie Azoulay Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Christian Greis; Zohal Rasuly; Rolf A Janosi; Lambros Kordelas; Dietrich W Beelen; Tobias Liebregts Journal: Crit Care Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 9.097