Literature DB >> 23471370

Oral fluid and plasma 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and metabolite correlation after controlled oral MDMA administration.

Nathalie A Desrosiers1, Allan J Barnes, Rebecca L Hartman, Karl B Scheidweiler, Erin A Kolbrich-Spargo, David A Gorelick, Robert S Goodwin, Marilyn A Huestis.   

Abstract

Oral fluid (OF) offers a noninvasive sample collection for drug testing. However, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) in OF has not been adequately characterized in comparison to plasma. We administered oral low-dose (1.0 mg/kg) and high-dose (1.6 mg/kg) MDMA to 26 participants and collected simultaneous OF and plasma specimens for up to 143 h after dosing. We compared OF/plasma (OF/P) ratios, time of initial detection (t first), maximal concentrations (C max), time of peak concentrations (t max), time of last detection (t last), clearance, and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA)-to-MDMA ratios over time. For OF MDMA and MDA, C max was higher, t last was later, and clearance was slower compared to plasma. For OF MDA only, t first was later compared to plasma. Median (range) OF/P ratios were 5.6 (0.1-52.3) for MDMA and 3.7 (0.7-24.3) for MDA. OF and plasma concentrations were weakly but significantly correlated (MDMA: R(2) = 0.438, MDA: R(2) = 0.197, p < 0.0001). Median OF/P ratios were significantly higher following high dose administration: MDMA low = 5.2 (0.1-40.4), high = 6.0 (0.4-52.3, p < 0.05); MDA low = 3.3 (0.7-17.1), high = 4.1 (0.9-24.3, p < 0.001). There was a large inter-subject variation in OF/P ratios. The MDA/MDMA ratios in plasma were higher than those in OF (p < 0.001), and the MDA/MDMA ratios significantly increased over time in OF and plasma. The MDMA and MDA concentrations were higher in OF than in plasma. OF and plasma concentrations were correlated, but large inter-subject variability precludes the estimation of plasma concentrations from OF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23471370      PMCID: PMC3638040          DOI: 10.1007/s00216-013-6848-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  13 in total

1.  On-site testing of saliva and sweat with Drugwipe and determination of concentrations of drugs of abuse in saliva, plasma and urine of suspected users.

Authors:  N Samyn; C van Haeren
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  MDMA and metabolite disposition in expectorated oral fluid after controlled oral MDMA administration.

Authors:  Allan J Barnes; Karl B Scheidweiler; Erin A Kolbrich-Spargo; David A Gorelick; Robert S Goodwin; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.681

3.  The prevalence of drugs in injured drivers.

Authors:  Olaf H Drummer; Irene Kourtis; Jochen Beyer; Penny Tayler; Martin Boorman; Dimitri Gerostamoulos
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Usefulness of saliva for measurement of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and its metabolites: correlation with plasma drug concentrations and effect of salivary pH.

Authors:  M Navarro; S Pichini; M Farré; J Ortuño; P N Roset; J Segura; R de la Torre
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  The U.S. Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs: current status and future considerations.

Authors:  Donna M Bush
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Negative-ion chemical ionization gas chromatography-mass spectrometry assay for enantioselective measurement of amphetamines in oral fluid: application to a controlled study with MDMA and driving under the influence cases.

Authors:  Frank T Peters; Nele Samyn; Thomas Kraemer; Wim J Riedel; Hans H Maurer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Guidelines for research on drugged driving.

Authors:  J Michael Walsh; Alain G Verstraete; Marilyn A Huestis; Jørg Mørland
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Plasma, oral fluid and sweat wipe ecstasy concentrations in controlled and real life conditions.

Authors:  Nele Samyn; Gert De Boeck; Michelle Wood; Caroline T J Lamers; Dick De Waard; Karel A Brookhuis; Alain G Verstraete; Wim J Riedel
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2002-08-14       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Plasma pharmacokinetics of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine after controlled oral administration to young adults.

Authors:  Erin A Kolbrich; Robert S Goodwin; David A Gorelick; Robert J Hayes; Elliot A Stein; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.681

10.  Two-dimensional gas chromatography/electron-impact mass spectrometry with cryofocusing for simultaneous quantification of MDMA, MDA, HMMA, HMA, and MDEA in human plasma.

Authors:  Erin A Kolbrich; Ross H Lowe; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled cannabis smoking in frequent and occasional smokers.

Authors:  Matthew N Newmeyer; Nathalie A Desrosiers; Dayong Lee; Damodara R Mendu; Allan J Barnes; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.345

2.  3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and metabolites disposition in blood and plasma following controlled oral administration.

Authors:  Rebecca L Hartman; Nathalie A Desrosiers; Allan J Barnes; Keming Yun; Karl B Scheidweiler; Erin A Kolbrich-Spargo; David A Gorelick; Robert S Goodwin; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.142

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.