Emerson Y Chen1, William M Lee, Linda S Hynan, Amit G Singal. 1. *Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health and Hospital System Departments of †Clinical Sciences ‡Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Abstract
GOALS: To describe current hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment practices in the United States and identify physician characteristics associated with the use of first generation direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). BACKGROUND: HCV treatment practice patterns have not been assessed after the introduction of DAA, which are now considered standard of care for most HCV genotype 1 patients. STUDY: We sampled nationally representative physicians treating HCV patients with DAAs through a web-based survey. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify physician characteristics associated with the use of DAAs in 4 clinical vignettes (early stage fibrosis, prior null response, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection, and post-liver transplantation). RESULTS: Of 1658 deliverable emails, 337 (20.3%) clinicians responded. Fifty percent of providers recommended DAA therapy for treatment-naive patients with early stage fibrosis, whereas 49% of providers would await new therapies. For prior null responders with significant fibrosis, 74% would attempt retreatment using DAAs and 26% would await new therapies. Off-label use of DAAs was recommended by 69% of providers for patients with HIV infection and 48% of providers for post-liver transplant patients. Academic affiliation was significantly associated with higher rates of off-label use in both HIV and post-liver transplant patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite more potent and less toxic therapies on the horizon, many physicians recommended DAAs in treatment-naive patients with early stage fibrosis. Providers also frequently recommended DAAs for off-label uses, such as treating post-liver transplant patients and those coinfected with HIV.
GOALS: To describe current hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment practices in the United States and identify physician characteristics associated with the use of first generation direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). BACKGROUND:HCV treatment practice patterns have not been assessed after the introduction of DAA, which are now considered standard of care for most HCV genotype 1 patients. STUDY: We sampled nationally representative physicians treating HCVpatients with DAAs through a web-based survey. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify physician characteristics associated with the use of DAAs in 4 clinical vignettes (early stage fibrosis, prior null response, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection, and post-liver transplantation). RESULTS: Of 1658 deliverable emails, 337 (20.3%) clinicians responded. Fifty percent of providers recommended DAA therapy for treatment-naive patients with early stage fibrosis, whereas 49% of providers would await new therapies. For prior null responders with significant fibrosis, 74% would attempt retreatment using DAAs and 26% would await new therapies. Off-label use of DAAs was recommended by 69% of providers for patients with HIV infection and 48% of providers for post-liver transplant patients. Academic affiliation was significantly associated with higher rates of off-label use in both HIV and post-liver transplant patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite more potent and less toxic therapies on the horizon, many physicians recommended DAAs in treatment-naive patients with early stage fibrosis. Providers also frequently recommended DAAs for off-label uses, such as treating post-liver transplant patients and those coinfected with HIV.
Authors: Ira M Jacobson; John G McHutchison; Geoffrey Dusheiko; Adrian M Di Bisceglie; K Rajender Reddy; Natalie H Bzowej; Patrick Marcellin; Andrew J Muir; Peter Ferenci; Robert Flisiak; Jacob George; Mario Rizzetto; Daniel Shouval; Ricard Sola; Ruben A Terg; Eric M Yoshida; Nathalie Adda; Leif Bengtsson; Abdul J Sankoh; Tara L Kieffer; Shelley George; Robert S Kauffman; Stefan Zeuzem Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gregory L Armstrong; Annemarie Wasley; Edgar P Simard; Geraldine M McQuillan; Wendi L Kuhnert; Miriam J Alter Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-05-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: M P Manns; J G McHutchison; S C Gordon; V K Rustgi; M Shiffman; R Reindollar; Z D Goodman; K Koury; M Ling; J K Albrecht Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-09-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael W Fried; Mitchell L Shiffman; K Rajender Reddy; Coleman Smith; George Marinos; Fernando L Gonçales; Dieter Häussinger; Moises Diago; Giampiero Carosi; Daniel Dhumeaux; Antonio Craxi; Amy Lin; Joseph Hoffman; Jian Yu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-09-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Francesca J Torriani; Maribel Rodriguez-Torres; Jürgen K Rockstroh; Eduardo Lissen; Juan Gonzalez-García; Adriano Lazzarin; Giampiero Carosi; Joseph Sasadeusz; Christine Katlama; Julio Montaner; Hoel Sette; Sharon Passe; Jean De Pamphilis; Frank Duff; Uschi Marion Schrenk; Douglas T Dieterich Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-07-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nevin Yilmaz; Mitchell L Shiffman; R Todd Stravitz; Richard K Sterling; Velimir A Luketic; Arun J Sanyal; A Scott Mills; Melissa J Contos; Adrian Coterell; Daniel Maluf; Marc P Posner; Robert A Fisher Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: M G Bowring; L M Kucirka; A B Massie; X Luo; A Cameron; M Sulkowski; K Rakestraw; A Gurakar; I Kuo; D L Segev; C M Durand Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Shahid Habib; Edward Meister; Sana Habib; Traci Murakami; Courtney Walker; Abbas Rana; Obaid S Shaikh Journal: Gastroenterology Res Date: 2015-10-21