Literature DB >> 23470117

Adherence to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and length of stay after colonic resection.

H Cakir1, M F M van Stijn, A M F Lopes Cardozo, B L A M Langenhorst, W H Schreurs, T J van der Ploeg, W A Bemelman, A P J Houdijk.   

Abstract

AIM: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme is a multimodal approach to improve peri-operative care in colon surgery. The aim of this study was to report on the adherence to and outcomes of ERAS in the first years after implementation.
METHOD: Data of patients undergoing elective colon resections for malignancy in 2006 until 2010 were compared with patients receiving conventional care in 2005. Retrospective analysis was performed including length of stay (LOS), protocol adherence and complications. The predictive values of ERAS items and baseline characteristics on LOS and complications were analysed using univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Length of stay (LOS) was significantly shorter in 2006 and 2007 (P ≤ 0.009 and P ≤ 0.004) but not in 2008 and 2009. The mean adherence rate to the ERAS items was 84.1% in 2006 and 2007 and 72.4% in 2008 and 2009 (P < 0.001). In 2005, 2008 and 2009 LOS was significantly shorter for laparoscopically operated patients than for patients with open resections (P < 0.002, P < 0.001 and P < 0.004 respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that age, laparoscopic surgery, removal of nasogastric tube before extubation, mobilization within 24 h after surgery, starting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs at day 1 and removal of thoracic epidural analgesia at day 2 were independent predictors of LOS.
CONCLUSION: Strict adherence to the ERAS protocol was associated with reduced LOS and improved outcome in elective colon surgery for malignancy. These benefits were lost when protocol adherence was lower. Embedding the ERAS protocol into an organization and repetitive education are vital to sustain its beneficial effects on LOS and outcome. Colorectal Disease
© 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enhanced recovery; colon cancer; colon surgery; laparoscopic

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23470117     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  23 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  David E Messenger; Nathan J Curtis; Adam Jones; Emma L Jones; Neil J Smart; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within enhanced recovery after surgery programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Cheng-Le Zhuang; Dong-Dong Huang; Fan-Feng Chen; Chong-Jun Zhou; Bei-Shi Zheng; Bi-Cheng Chen; Xian Shen; Zhen Yu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Tips, Tricks, and Technique for Laparoscopic Colectomy.

Authors:  Alexandra Briggs; Joel Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-04

4.  Enhanced recovery implementation in colorectal surgery-temporary or persistent improvement?

Authors:  David Martin; Didier Roulin; Valérie Addor; Catherine Blanc; Nicolas Demartines; Martin Hübner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Right and Left Colectomy: Comparison of Functional Recovery.

Authors:  Anne Kummer; Juliette Slieker; Fabian Grass; Dieter Hahnloser; Nicolas Demartines; Martin Hübner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Association of an Enhanced Recovery Pilot With Length of Stay in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Julia R Berian; Kristen A Ban; Jason B Liu; Christine L Sullivan; Clifford Y Ko; Julie K M Thacker; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  The influence of preoperative nutritional status on the outcomes of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme for colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  V Lohsiriwat
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Cost impact analysis of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program implementation in Alberta colon cancer patients.

Authors:  G Nelson; L N Kiyang; A Chuck; N X Thanh; L M Gramlich
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Active and passive compliance in an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  Christopher C Thorn; Ian White; Jennie Burch; George Malietzis; Robin Kennedy; John T Jenkins
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Enhanced Recovery Program for Colorectal Surgery: a Focus on Elderly Patients Over 75 Years Old.

Authors:  Maria Carmen Lirosi; Flavio Tirelli; Alberto Biondi; Maria Cristina Mele; Cristina Larotonda; Laura Lorenzon; Domenico D'Ugo; Antonio Gasbarrini; Roberto Persiani
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.