AIM: To evaluate tumor response in patients with hypovascular liver metastases from the most common primary sites treated with chemoembolization. MATERIALS & METHODS: Chemoembolization was performed in 190 patients (five groups) who had hypovascular liver metastases from the colon (n = 66), breast (n = 40), uveal malignant melanoma (n = 20), pancreas (n = 48) and stomach (n = 16). Surgical resection of primary sites had been performed for all included patients. Tumor response, survival statistics from the first chemoembolization using Kaplan-Meier method and progression rate of embolized lesions were evaluated by analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test. RESULTS: Multiple comparison between the groups showed no statistical significant difference in local tumor response (H: 9.23; p > 0.05). Survival indices of the patients, including survival rate, progression-free survival rate, median survival time and time to progression, demonstrated significant difference between the groups during the follow-up period (H: 9.7; p = 0.045). The progression rate of treated liver metastases from colon, breast, uvea, pancreas and stomach were 16.6, 17.5, 30.0, 25.0 and 32.0%, respectively (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Hypovascular liver metastases treated with chemoembolization may demonstrate equal local response, but are significantly different in rate of progression and survival.
AIM: To evaluate tumor response in patients with hypovascular liver metastases from the most common primary sites treated with chemoembolization. MATERIALS & METHODS: Chemoembolization was performed in 190 patients (five groups) who had hypovascular liver metastases from the colon (n = 66), breast (n = 40), uveal malignant melanoma (n = 20), pancreas (n = 48) and stomach (n = 16). Surgical resection of primary sites had been performed for all included patients. Tumor response, survival statistics from the first chemoembolization using Kaplan-Meier method and progression rate of embolized lesions were evaluated by analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test. RESULTS: Multiple comparison between the groups showed no statistical significant difference in local tumor response (H: 9.23; p > 0.05). Survival indices of the patients, including survival rate, progression-free survival rate, median survival time and time to progression, demonstrated significant difference between the groups during the follow-up period (H: 9.7; p = 0.045). The progression rate of treated liver metastases from colon, breast, uvea, pancreas and stomach were 16.6, 17.5, 30.0, 25.0 and 32.0%, respectively (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION:Hypovascular liver metastases treated with chemoembolization may demonstrate equal local response, but are significantly different in rate of progression and survival.