Literature DB >> 23469805

A tool to evaluate patients' experiences of nursing care in Australian general practice: development of the Patient Enablement and Satisfaction Survey.

Jane Desborough1, Michelle Banfield1, Rhian Parker1.   

Abstract

Australian health policy initiatives have increasingly supported the employment of nurses in general practice. An understanding of the impact of nursing care on patients in this setting is integral to assuring quality, safety and a patient-centred focus. The aim was to develop a survey to evaluate the satisfaction and enablement of patients who receive nursing care in Australian general practices. The survey was to be simple to administer and analyse, ensuring practicality for use by general practice nurses, doctors and managers. Two validated instruments formed the basis of the Patient Enablement and Satisfaction Survey (PESS). This survey was refined and validated for the Australian setting using focus groups and in-depth interviews with patients, and feedback from general practice nurses. Test-retest and alternate form methods were used to establish the survey's reliability. Feedback resulted in 14 amendments to the original draft survey. Questions that demonstrated a strong positive correlation for the test-retest and alternate form measures were included in the final survey. The PESS is a useful, practical tool for the evaluation of nursing care in Australian general practice, its validity and reliability established through a patient-centred research approach, reflective of the needs of patients accessing nursing services in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23469805     DOI: 10.1071/PY12121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Prim Health        ISSN: 1448-7527            Impact factor:   1.307


  5 in total

1.  A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.

Authors:  Claudia Bull; Joshua Byrnes; Ruvini Hettiarachchi; Martin Downes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  A review of the growth and development of Australian practice nursing: Insights for the dietetic workforce.

Authors:  Alexandra R Davidson; Dianne P Reidlinger
Journal:  Nutr Diet       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Understanding factors affecting 30-day unplanned readmissions for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA): the ACT Transition from Hospital to Home Orthopaedics Survey.

Authors:  Madhur Chhabra; Diana Perriman; Christine Phillips; Anne Parkinson; Nicholas Glasgow; Kirsty Douglas; Darlene Cox; Paul Smith; Jane Desborough
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Preferences, predictions and patient enablement: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Carl J Brusse; Laurann E Yen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  [Questionnaires of person centered care in primary care. A systematic review].

Authors:  José Antonio Pascual López; Trinidad Gil Pérez; Juan Antonio Sánchez Sánchez; Juan Francisco Menárguez Puche
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 1.137

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.