| Literature DB >> 23469110 |
Molly M Lamb1, Melissa D Simpson, Jennifer Seifert, Fraser W Scott, Marian Rewers, Jill M Norris.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infant dietary exposures have been linked to type 1 diabetes (T1D) development. IgG4 antibody responses to food antigens are associated with food intolerances but have not been explored prospectively in the period preceding T1D.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23469110 PMCID: PMC3585253 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Selection of the analysis cohorts.
Analysis of dietary antibodies as predictors of IA development in the case-cohort; Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY).
| Developed IA | Did not develop IA | All Visits | Transglutaminase Negative Children | |
|
| ||||
| Dietary Antibodies | Mean mg/L (SD) (n = 120visits in 77 subjects) | Mean mg/L (SD) (n = 1146visits in 183 subjects) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
| β-lactoglobulin | 15.0 (29.7) | 10.9 (18.2) | 1.15 (0.89, 1.48) | 1.19 (0.91, 1.56) |
| Gluten | 5.5 (15.8) | 4.3 (10.6) | 1.12 (0.85, 1.47) | 1.08 (0.78, 1.50) |
| Ovalbumin | 6.1 (17.2) | 5.0 (10.3) | 1.06 (0.84, 1.35) | 0.99 (0.72, 1.37) |
|
| ||||
| Mean rank (SD) | Mean rank (SD) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | |
| Quartile Rank | 7.4 (2.9) | 7.5 (2.7) | 0.97 (0.86, 1.09) | 0.98 (0.87, 1.11) |
|
| ||||
| Dietary Antibody | Mean mg/L (SD) (n = 49 subjects) | Mean mg/L (SD) (n = 105subjects) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
| β-lactoglobulin | 13.3 (25.9) | 10.2 (20.0) | 1.01 (0.98, 1.04) | 1.01 (0.98, 1.04) |
| Gluten | 0.9 (4.6) | 0.5 (1.2) | 1.13 (0.69, 1.83) | 1.13 (0.69, 1.83) |
| Ovalbumin | 1.3 (3.1) | 2.5 (8.9) | 0.93 (0.84, 1.04) | 0.93 (0.84, 1.04) |
Models exclude the 32 subjects that developed transglutaminase antibodies.
Cox proportional hazards models, using dietary antibodies as a time-varying covariate, were adjusted for HLA, family history of T1DM, and ethnicity. Hazard Ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated for the risk of IA for a standard deviation difference in dietary antibody.
Quartile rank of dietary antibodies is a composite measure of antigenic response, in which concentrations of each dietary antibody were divided into quartiles, ranked 1(‘low’) through 4 (‘high’), and summed for each clinic visit. The lowest value was 3 if all three antibodies were in the lowest quartile at that visit and the highest value was 12 if all three antibodies were in the top quartile.
Sample size is reduced as not all children had IgG4 measured <2 years of age.
Cox proportional hazards models, using mean dietary antibody concentration at <2 years of age as a fixed covariate, were adjusted for HLA, T1D family history, and ethnicity.
Analysis of dietary antibodies at first autoantibody positive visit and progression to T1D; Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY).
| Autoantibody Positive Children Who DevelopedT1D (n = 22 subjects) | Autoantibody Positive Children Who Did Not Develop T1D (n = 55 subjects) | All Visits | Transglutaminase Negative Children | |
|
| ||||
| Dietary Antibody | Mean mg/L (SD) | Mean mg/L (SD) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
| β-lactoglobulin | 12.00 (24.4) | 15.6 (30.0) | 0.90 (0.55, 1.47) | 1.00 (0.62, 1.61) |
| Gluten | 7.0 (16.8) | 4.7 (11.6) | 1.45 (0.89, 2.39) | 1.56 (0.90, 2.71) |
| Ovalbumin | 94.7 (6.2) | 3.9 (5.3) | 1.39 (1.00, 1.92) | 1.41 (0.99, 2.00) |
|
| ||||
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | |
| Quartile Rank | 7.8 (2.8) | 7.5 (2.8) | 1.10 (0.92, 1.30) | 1.08 (0.89, 1.31) |
|
| ||||
| Mean mg/L (SD)(n = 11 subjects) | Mean mg/L (SD)(n = 38 subjects) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | |
| β-lactoglobulin | 4.2 (6.0) | 14.4 (25.6) | 0.98 (0.92, 1.04) | 0.96 (0.88, 1.05) |
| Gluten | 0.1 (0.1) | 1.0 (3.5) | 0.10 (0.001, 15.6) | 0.07 (0.00, 17.3) |
| Ovalbumin | 0.5 (0.9) | 1.3 (2.9) | 0.77 (0.43, 1.37) | 0.66 (0.33, 1.32) |
Models exclude the 13 children that were positive for transglutaminase antibodies.
Cox proportional hazards models of antibodies at the first IA positive visit were adjusted for age at first IA positive visit, HLA, family history of T1D, and ethnicity. Hazard Ratios and 95% CI were estimated for the risk of T1D for a standard deviation difference in dietary antibody.
Quartile rank of dietary antibodies is a composite measure of antigenic response, in which concentrations of each dietary antibody were divided into quartiles, ranked 1(‘low’) through 4 (‘high’), and summed for each clinic visit. The lowest value was 3 if all three antibodies were in the lowest quartile at that visit and the highest value was 12 if all three antibodies were in the top quartile.
Sample size is reduced as not all children had IgG4 measured at <2 years of age.
Cox proportional hazards models, using mean dietary antibody concentration at <2 years of age as a fixed covariate, were adjusted for age at first IA positive visit, HLA, family history of T1D, and ethnicity.
p = 0.05.