| Literature DB >> 23469039 |
Hatice Betül Erer1, Tolga Sinan Güvenç, Ahu Sarbay Kemik, Hale Yaka Yılmaz, Şeref Kul, Servet Altay, Nurten Sayar, Yüksel Kaya, Mehmet Eren.
Abstract
Ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction is a morphologic and functional anomaly of myocardium characterized by prominent trabeculae accompanied by deep recessus. Dilated cardiomyopathy with left ventricular failure is observed in these patients, while the cause or pathophysiologic nature of this complication is not known. Anti-troponin antibodies are formed against circulating cardiac troponins after an acute coronary event or conditions associated with chronic myocyte necrosis, such as dilated cardiomyopathy. In present study, we aimed to investigate cardiac troponins and anti troponin autoantibodies in ventricular noncompaction/hypertrabeculation patients with/without reduced ejection fraction. A total of 50 patients with ventricular noncompaction and 23 healthy volunteers were included in this study. Noncompaction/hypertrabeculation was diagnosed with two-dimensional echocardiography using appropriate criteria. Depending on ejection fraction, patients were grouped into noncompaction with preserved EF (LVEF >50%, n = 24) and noncompaction with reduced EF (LVEF <35%, n = 26) groups. Troponin I, troponin T, anti-troponin I IgM and anti-troponin T IgM were measured with sandwich immunoassay method using a commercially available kit. Patients with noncompaction had significantly higher troponin I (28.98±9.21 ng/ml in NCNE group and 28.11±10.42 ng/ml in NCLE group), troponin T (22.17±6.97 pg/ml in NCNE group and 22.78±7.76 pg/ml in NCLE group) and antitroponin I IgM (1.92±0.43 µg/ml in NCNE group and 1.79±0.36 µg/ml in NCLE group) levels compared to control group, while antitroponin T IgM and IgG were only elevated in patients with noncompaction and reduced EF (15.81±6.52 µg/ml for IgM and 16.46±6.25 µg/ml for IgG). Elevated cardiac troponins and anti-troponin I autoantibodies were observed in patients with noncompaction preceding the decline in systolic function and could indicate ongoing myocardial damage in these patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23469039 PMCID: PMC3585198 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057648
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic appearance from parasternal short-axis view of a patient with isolated left ventricular noncompaction.
Demographic and clinical variables regarding to study groups.
| Parameter | Normal Controls (n = 23) | Noncompaction with Normal EF (n = 24) | Noncompaction with Reduced EF (n = 26) | P Value |
|
| ||||
|
| 34±10.0 | 36±16.8 | 37±16.2 | NS |
|
| 44% | 42% | 80% | NS |
|
| 17% | 37% | 19% | NS |
|
| 4% | 4% | 15% | NS |
|
| 22% | 13% | 19% | NS |
|
| 0% | 17% | 12% | NS |
|
| ||||
|
| 3.8% | |||
|
| (−) | (−) | 19.2% | (−) |
|
| 53.8% | |||
|
| 23.1% | |||
|
| 0% | 21% | 23% |
|
|
| 76.61±6.81 | 72.29±14.44 | 81.42±15.21 |
|
|
| 121.83±11.86 | 126.88±11.33 | 115.46±12.76 |
|
|
| 73.52±8.13 | 76.33±8.24 | 68.96±8.78 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| 13% | 42% | 92% |
|
|
| 10% | 17% | 8% | NS |
|
| 4% | 54% | 92% |
|
|
| 0% | 8% | 27% |
|
|
| 0% | 0% | 46% |
|
|
| 0% | 4% | 88% |
|
|
| 9% | 25% | 88% |
|
|
| 0% | 8% | 12% | NS |
|
| 0% | 0% | 4% | NS |
Data is given ± SD for scalar variables. ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker. Provided p value refers to significance level for comparisons between all groups.
Significantly higher compared to lowest values.
Significantly higher compared to all groups.
Echocardiographic and laboratory variables regarding to study groups.
| Parameter | Normal Controls(n = 23) | Noncompaction withNormal EF (n = 24) | Noncompaction withReduced EF (n = 26) | P value |
|
| ||||
|
| 97.35±26.75 | 140.99±53.05 | 170.25±40.86 |
|
|
| 27.45±7.46 | 71.58±46.49 | 121.45±32.01 |
|
|
| 61.83±3.28 | 56.88±6.05 | 28.08±7.08 |
|
|
| 1.37±0.20 | 1.36±0.39 | 1.37±0.91 | NS |
|
| 5.78±1.49 | 6.43±1.28 | 10.8±6.35 |
|
|
| 0.45±0.06 | 0.39±0.21 | 0.73±0.14 |
|
|
| (−) | 2.44±0.62 | 4.05±1.13 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| 9.74±1.97 | 28.98±9.21 | 28.11±10.42 |
|
|
| 13.42±4.19 | 22.17±6.97 | 22.78±7.76 |
|
|
| 0.80±0.23 | 1.92±0.43 | 1.79±0.36 |
|
|
| 12.00±2.32 | 12.33±5.68 | 15.81±6.52 |
|
|
| 11.91±2.33 | 12.34±5.80 | 16.46±6.25 |
|
Data is given ± SD for scalar variables. LVEDD, Left ventricular end diastolic volume; LVESD, Left ventricular end systolic volume; LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction; E/A, ratio of mitral early flow to atrial flow; E/Em, ratio of mitral early flow to early diastolic movement of mitral annulus; NC/HT, hypertrabeculation/noncompaction. Provided p value refers to significance level for comparisons between all groups.
Significantly higher compared to lowest values.
Significantly higher compared to all groups.
Figure 2Boxplot diagrams showing troponin I, anti-troponin I IgM, troponin T and antitroponin T IgM levels in study groups.
Troponin I (A), antitroponin I IgM (B) and troponin T (C) measurements were elevated in both NC/HT groups compared to controls, while antitroponin T IgM (D) levels were only elevated in subgroup of patients with reduced ejection fraction.
Figure 3Scatter plot diagrams showing relationship between ejection fraction and antitroponin I IgM, antitroponin T IgM and antitroponin T IgG in noncompaction patients.
Correlations for antitroponin I IgM (A), antitroponin T IgM (B) and antitroponin T IgG (C) did not reach statistical significance and had low correlation coefficients. Note that antitroponin T IgM levels were similar to antitroponin T IgG levels (in panels B and C).